Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Wiktor Niedzicki ᠌ photo
1 Level
343 Review
0 Karma

Review on MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 195/65 R15 95T winter by Wiktor Niedzicki ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disgusting, I don't recommend it to anyone!

michelin x-ice north 4 is tires for 5000km, then the spikes sway and there is no sense from them. That michelin x-ice north 3 was because the spikes broke, that michelin x-ice north 4 was . Here was a michelin x-ice north 2, just super rubber, the only negative is the weak sidewall, and everything suited me that way. They stood on my logan, I just ped on the right. I remember the snow fell well, and as always, no one cleaned it, so all the cars trudge, and I drive confidently 60 km, then I didn’t understand what was the matter, then I realized when the Nordman 5 bought and almost killed himself on it. Therefore, it is difficult for me to understand Michelin's policy. Why do you need to litter normal tires ? You can simply increase the thickness of the cord, well, you can still plant the spikes stronger, and that's all. So they managed to mess everything up, It seems that they have got nits at their enterprise and they do it on purpose. The company’s car also had the same tires, it traveled 7000 km, there were no loss of spikes, but you can safely swing them all with your finger in different directions. In general, it is not clear to me why pollute your reputation. But I personally will never buy Michelin again and I will advise my friends not to buy, because there was a divorce with michelin x-ice north 3, all the spikes broke, for 2 thousand, and here it’s , but it’s not cheap. Now release any "super model", I won't believe you and I won't take it!

Pros
  • the first 5000 km was super rubber.
Cons
  • the spikes are just not what they are, there are a lot of them, but they are small, and even with not much snow they stop working. But the most important thing is that their normal work ends after 5000-7000 km. Also, the cord could be made stiffer.