Analogues used: Fujifilm X-S1 and X-10 lenses in macro mode; Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Di MACRO 1:1 Nikon F; Helios 44-3 with macro rings. It can be used as a long portrait lens, but the depth of field at an open aperture is somewhat large. As a macro lens, unexpectedly good, the criticism is mainly about the packaging. It is desirable to work on a verycomvered hole of 1/10 or less - after all, the M4 / 3 system is inferior to systems with smaller matrices: the percentage of defective depth of field is greater than that of the Fujifilm X-S1 lens and less than that of the Tamron SP AF 90mm f / 2.8 Di MACRO 1 :1 Nikon F. Icompared it in manual focus mode (I have an E-M10) through adapters with a Helios 44-3 lens with macro rings - the latter has a lot of fuss, the result is worse. Focal lengths are close orcomparable, relative apertures are nearby. But, the Olympus ED 60 mm f/2.8 distorts less, it is easier to focus, although there is not much difference in speed with manual focusing, but the image quality is better even in RAW. Since a similar panas is more expensive, I recommend it for olives. ? page=4 ? page=4 ? page=4 ? page=0
📷 Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G Lens with Auto Focus: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras
76 Review
Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Lens - Fixed Black (6310B002) for US Cameras
76 Review