Canon PowerShot SX50 HS Camera Review

I made the decision to switch cameras; previously, I had been using a Panasonic FZ38. Most of the photographs I take are of the ocean, nature, and various forms of life that happen to fit inside the frame or frames of the FZ38.

After using the FujiFilm FinePix S4300, I decided to switch to this gadget since the difference between the two is really noticeable, and I am over the moon thrilled with this equipment. Has some pros: Absolutely, there are a great deal of them! 12 megapixels with such a matrix is a huge plus, given that a camera with 14 megapixels is already difficult to meet, mostly 16-20 megapixels, fast and accurate focusing, excellent hybrid stabilizer, excellent zoom, many functions and modes, a lot of…

The photos will generally turn out better than those of rivals with a similar range of EGF when shot in good light, but the best quality can only be attained from RAW by mastering the straightforward proprietary Digital Photo Professional utility. With its advantages: a comfortable grip and key layout, a swivel screen with good viewing angles, speed, a strong and quiet zoom (50x), a superior optical stabilizer, support for the RAW format, macro shooting at a distance of 0 cm, a large battery, a

Ultrazoom Sony 32 x 16 MP, 1980-50 Moreover, And the next level is a mirror with a bunch of lenses, mirrorless cameras with large matrices heat up when shooting video.

Got pros: there are so many advantages that you can’ say that don’ my friends have DSLRs, Has some cons: unless you need an adapter for the filter and for a hood for a protective shield from the sun .

there are preset and manual shooting settings, usually don't like the auto mode), with a zoom on a tripod, excellent pictures of the moon! then it won’t hurt to buy filters)) Has pros: Relatively small size, large zoom, manual aperture and shutter speed settings, fits comfortably in the hand, good flash (power can be adjusted), low price with very good device parameters Cons: not very convenient lens cap, there is not enough matrix size (but then the price tag would be much higher))))))))))

Has pros: in the best traditions of PowerShot, an excellent stabilizer, zoom, video, of course, 120 and 240 fps modes. Cons: Noisy lens when zooming (became especially noisy after a few days of use) IS - it was much quieter there.

Its pros: Zoom, weight, size, photo quality, flash, settings, noise reduction. Some cons: Marky screen, and the rest is my nitpicking) I didn’t figure out how to shoot a video with sound)))

A good device for an advanced, In small viewing formats, especially after processing in photo editors, mode, But since almost no one looks at pictures in this size, you need very strong hands, and even better a tripod. Its pros: Powerful zoom, swivel screen, viewfinder, RAW format, convenient menu. Got cons: Inconvenient lens cap, short strap, flash should be raised by hand, not by pressing a button (although this may be for the better)

I bought it purely for myself, the video and photo quality is also on top! ) I can’t say that it’s completely perfect, I do not know, I think it is inappropriate to write it here.

it has all the current nanotechnologies, With its pros: there are so many advantages that you can’ say that don’ my friends have DSLRs, Got cons: unless you need an adapter for the filter and for a hood for a protective shield from the sun .

For technical photography and SA, the device is excellent (taking into account the limitations of operation declared by the manufacturer), it will probably last a long time, Sample photo here album "Canon sx 50".

because of the weak zoom (compared to Sony), or rather, it is very powerful - the moon turned out just lovely! , I was able to exchange for a 1100 with such an approximation, one can only dream of.

Good for family photography, you have to use a flash or catch good shots without it, Shooting in RAW gives you more creative options, Sample photos: page=1 page=1 page=0 page=0 page=0

In general, a device with such a set of functions (the presence of RAW, the ability to install a remote control, lens hoods, filters, an additional flash, etc. ) can easily claim the title of a semi-professional camera, the totality of this set can be worth the money that it asks for the device is a manufacturer, but the quality of the photos, with insufficient illumination in places, frustrates with its noise, even the more budgetary canon cameras sometimes shoot better, and of course, as they

I have been using Canon cameras for 8 years and have never regretted I chose the ultrazoom from x45 there were 2 competitors at the finish line, SX50 and HX300 from Sony I went to the store, where I tested each model for a couple of hours! eventually, Advantages of Sony over Canon: - lightning fast focus - the lens is slightly lighter (unfortunately, this does not affect the improvement of the picture quality) - looks more serious cons of sony: - very noisy at all ISO (send hello 20…

This camera is for those who have already felt a taste for photography and "grew" After three months of accurately photographing lunar craters (I swore to myself not to repeat the mistakes of others, but the album “moon” on my computer weighs 8 GB), I came to my senses, but not for long, species of birds live in my house (24 GB album) holidays, especially beautiful sunsets, shy animals and intractable children, In short, if you are ready to learn and experiment, Ru/users/gnbwf-cnhfec/

For a year I was looking for an ultrazoom for my "photo growth" Nikon P 510/520, Fuji HS 30/50 EXR, Fuji SL 1000, Sony HX 200/300, Panasonic FZ 200 and all others for 25 it was not possible to buy, HS on sale, after looking at the technical data, it remains to wait for user reviews, good video with soft and quiet zoom, quick start, convenient settings ring, simplicity and consistency of settings, charging and discharging the battery without surprises: the indicator at the end allows you to work

1 I took it for the zoom, 2 distance 10 m, 8/17/2022 Moon (zoom 50 - 200): v=vi0bnZdyn-c Pigeons (slowdown 1/10): 3. 16202202222 -)

The difference in price is almost 9 more, then you could buy a Canon 1100 take it only because of a) laziness to remove / install lenses, buy them, this camera serves as my mother's main camera))) My summary after 7 months of use: 1) In general, the camera is quite "dark" If you take after the camera for 3000, Video in full ash di is good, and the battery lasts for about 20 then by 10 3) By the way, the zoom is really cool, 4) albeit not a Brand, but a mirror is the quality of the picture, m