Review on Thetford Dry closet Thetford Porta Potti 565 P liquid by Stanisaw Lipowski ᠌

Name: Thetford Dry closet Thetford Porta Potti 565 P liquid
Item: Thetford Dry closet Thetford Porta Potti 565 P liquid
Rating: 5

June 20, 2023

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Completely satisfied with the purchase.

Powder-closet (a bowl of grass) cannot be compared with this top of engineering, with this work of art, which will become a real friend to you both in the country, without requiring you to solve the issue of sewage, and in the garage, where no one can do it will allow, and on self-isolation, if no one can contact you for 2 weeks, and even remotely, if you can’t move away from your workplace, but you can use it instead of an office chair.
These and thousands of other uses you can think of yourself

Updated 3 years ago

Rating has not been changed

To capture the essence of my experience, I have included some photos with my review.
﻿

Pros

Toilet bowl design (unlike other purely cubic models), comfortable height from the floor to the seat, large capacity of the tanks, allowing you to use the device alone for up to 14 days (provided that you use it only "in a big way"), convenient: a toilet seat, tank fill indicators, a filling and draining system, as well as a pump. The pump allows you to control the descent: pulling it out to its full length, you can quickly and completely lower it down - the jet will wash the entire area in a circle, with the exception of the back wall; with a smooth short press, only the back wall will be washed; when gently pressed to the end, the entire area is evenly washed. By varying the speed of lowering the pump and the length, you can easily direct the flow to the right place, which, firstly, contributes to the economy of consumption, and secondly, it often allows you to do without a brush, which is nice. The structure is sealed. The handles for moving the sections are ergonomic, the grip is correct, you can move even a completely filled device to some distance without consequences for your reputation. But it is recommended to transfer one section at a time - it's easier and even more convenient.

Cons

The reverse side of the large capacity of the waste accumulator is the mass of the resulting structure, which significantly complicates the process of emptying it, since it must be carried in the hand from the installation site of the device to the drain point, and even if you don’t figure out how to drain it without holding the structure on weight, a certain number of seconds you have to keep it static, maybe in an uncomfortable position, while it eases. There was nothing to weigh, so I will give the general values: by default, a solution of 100 ml is poured down. liquid per 3 liters of water, about 15 liters of flushing solution with waste are poured into it. Therefore, for those who cannot carry weights, we can recommend either emptying more often, not allowing them to be completely filled (but then you will have to fill in the solution more often, i. E. the liquid consumption will be higher), or come up with something to bring the section: a garden cart, an unnecessary nursery a stroller, a transport board on wheels, a body from a trolley bag, a children's bike, a car trunk, in the end (if you can get there by car). I believe that a rental electric scooter would be the best solution (engine power, latitude of the delivery (not a typo) place, beautiful lighting, but it is unlikely that you will not turn it off when crossing the border of the city, so the option is not suitable for anyone yet.