Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Agata Wielgosz ᠌ photo
1 Level
153 Review
0 Karma

Review on ⌚ Optimized COROS Keychain Watch Charger by Agata Wielgosz ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I will never repeat this purchase.

I compared it to AW, a chest strap, a heart rate monitor, and GPS apps on a smartphone, and each time the Koros data proved to be considerably different. During street training, it was especially annoying since warnings were continuously activated—and not because the ranges had been set wrongly, but rather because of erratic false heart-rate or speed indicators. unique music application. In fact, this is a poorly designed web interface that displays numbers incorrectly without offering the user any analytical data. Data analytics with AW appears to be the Library of Congress in comparison to a newspaper in a remote closet against this backdrop. To establish a connection, you must tap your feet while shaking a tambourine, toggle the GPS or network, then prod the application's clock icon. The application won't function if you can't connect to the network. Web interface, that is. Choosing at least one watch face that would be attractive, useful, and convenient might be difficult given the apparent plethora of options available. Such dials simply don't exist. Data on sleep is purely arbitrary. They might display 13 after just 5 hours of sleep, 3 after 9 hours, and so on. The LED operates considerably more frequently than the predetermined interval of "1 time in 10 minutes" at night, and the green light shines so brilliantly from under the cover that it wakes me up frequently. On AW, this has never occurred. Coros has yet another joint. The "toothbrush" test fails because the steps are tallied randomly by hand vibrations; even in a dream, even if I don't have sleepwalking, they can count 300-500 steps. So what's the final word? These are the conclusions: - This is a fitness bracelet rather than a sports watch, thus precise readings cannot be acquired. You can use it as a watch, but the $20 Casio will still be preferred because it's less expensive and has no display. Very little optimism exists that the software will ever be substantially "completed." I can't speak for the other models made by this company, but I have a feeling that marketing there too took precedence over all other factors.

Pros
  • extended battery life - high light readability of the display - lungs
Cons
  • - ineffective indicators (heart rate, sleep, speed) - awkward application - dials - A subpar display Comment: Coros, which advertises itself as Garmin-2 and is widely pushed, has a very distinct product line and a very clear positioning. This is what got my attention. I believed that you could get a better watch than a Garmin or an Apple Watch for 200 Baku. As they looked at the box, they already had a vague desire to "love you"; the word "Premium" is always concerning, but it becomes even more so when it refers to subpar plastic "watches". And that is what happened. When I looked at the "watches" themselves, I didn't find any premium. What do we have, then? We have a fitness bracelet that is comparable to Chinese consumer products like Amazfit. It has a tiny proprietary firmware that weighs about 3.5 MB, a unique display, a long battery life (due to the same minimal OS and cheap display), and heart rate, sleep, and GPS data that is collected from the ceiling. The designers of this fitness bracelet were also aware of these drawbacks because they included features for GPS readings from a smartphone and heart rate readings via a chest strap. Then, since the smartphone can analyze GPS data and data from the chest strap, why do I need this phony watch as an intermediary? This fitness wristband failed after more than six months of tries to at least acquire some accurate results from it.

Comments (1)

Please, sign in to write a comment
April 07, 2023
Different pros: Excellent tracking and good measurement accuracy. Has some cons Original straps not found