To provide a brief summary, I do not know how outdated the device needs to be or how far it needs to be from the current state of technology for me to be content with this tablet. I have an old Xiaomi MiPad 1 that I purchased back when it was on sale for around 13,000 yuan. It is still functional and brings in an honest income; of course, it has some drawbacks, but it is relatively inexpensive. I don’t know why they ask for 65k here, if I take my experience from the purchase, I would only use such a device if I got it as a gift or got it for ~ 40k. 6/128 memory in a gadget that costs 65k is not reliable, given that there is a version of 8/256 available in Europe, a screen for a triple, sound as well, no wireless charging, IP68, no noteworthy autonomy, bad equipment, and in general, I have no idea where this price tag comes from. On paper, without taking into account the fact that the tablet does not have a jack and without taking into account any of the other technical limitations that were known in advance, the tablet appeared to be very good. Separate greetings to the department in charge of quality control at Samsung. A smattering of damaged pixels was found in a tablet that cost 65,000 dollars, which is something I have not even seen on cellphones that cost a couple of thousand dialers.
Smartphone Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G 8/256 GB Global, Dual nano SIM, Laser black
102 Review
Sevrok iPad 6th Generation Screen Protector: Tempered Glass, Bubble-Free, Anti-Scratch (Compatible with iPad 5th Gen, iPad Pro 9.7, iPad Air 2, iPad Air)
11 Review
📱 Protect Your Apple iPad Air 2 with (4 Pack) Supershieldz High Definition Clear Screen Protector (PET)
12 Review
Smartphone HUAWEI Mate 20 Pro 6/128 GB, Dual nano SIM, black
89 Review