Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kiril Panajotov ᠌ photo
1 Level
256 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 6/128 GB RU, Dual nano SIM, mint by Kiril Panajotov ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A reliable product for all occasions, the quality is at the level.

I need a smartphone with a screen and the best camera possible because I frequently capture photos and movies of my family. I choose Samsung flagships the majority of the time because of this. S5, S7, S9, and S10 (now with his wife) were present. I carefully examined phones made by other companies, but in terms of camera quality, they fell short of the Samsung S-series (particularly in terms of color reproduction). This time, the budget was $35–$40,000, and the S9+ or S20fe cameras, which are very fine but quite old, fit inside that range. I made the decision to try the last one for 39,000 after reading the reviews. Point by point then: 1) A camera. And this time, there is no letdown! We specifically compared it to my wife's S10 + and found that the larger primary sensor's image quality (1.8 microns vs. 1.4 pixels) is noticeably superior (pictures were uploaded to a computer and seen on a high-quality monitor). I was very happy with the nighttime photography because it really shows the benefit. We find it significant because it accurately portrays hues and analyzes children's features better. Additionally enjoyable is video, which has superb stabilization and considerably improved sound recording. 2. Display. Disappointed. Although AMOLED, the colors are faded and brightened after S10 +. Even the comparison to the previous S7 is negative. A50 scale. 3. SoC. I used to be dubious of criticism of Exynos CPUs because, as the owner of Exynos flagships, I never had any issues playing the best games at high settings (other than the casing getting warm). This time, though, things turned out to be considerably worse: according to a benchmark, the phone's GPU frequency lowers by 2.5 times when the battery temperature reaches 40 degrees. The screen may also be dimmed to 50% brightness! And after just 4 minutes of play, the device reaches these exact 40 degrees! Why are there games if a simple installation of an application might occasionally cause the screen to dim? I have no idea why, in addition to throttling, the brightness should be reduced as this interferes with even routine use. Naturally, the smartphone is not ideal for demanding games (I repeat, there were no issues with Samsung's prior flagship models).

Pros
  • 1. In terms of value for money, cameras are without a doubt the greatest (more on this in the comments). I decided on this gadget since it has cameras. 2. Processor performance in routine tasks: at flagship level, the speed of the user interface, browser, gallery, and banking applications. just up until the point where heavy gaming and resource-intensive chores are involved. [More information in the comments]. 3. Stereo speakers deliver clear high frequencies and a lot of volume. Low frequencies, at a level that's typical. 4. I'm delighted they kept wireless charging and waterproof protection. 5. The body feels sturdy despite being plastic.
Cons
  • 1. Screen (more explanation in comment) 2. Horrible CPU throttling (additional information is provided in the comments) 3. Average operating time: In my case, with 90% screen brightness and 60 Hz scanning, I get 5 hours of screen time (I don't play games much, but I capture a lot of photos and movies). 4. Recognizing that they would result in an even bigger reduction in operation time and CPU throttling, 120hz did not even try. 5. When picking up the identical S10+, the case's design and tactile qualities don't elicit the same sense of awe that you often do.