Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Kenta Omura photo
1 Level
89 Review
28 Karma

Review on Sony WIC400/L Wireless Behind-Neck In-Ear Headphones, Blue by Kenta Omura

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The purchase did not bring joy, the product is bad.

Battery capacity 240mAh, at full volume for about 9.5-10 hours Having bought them, I thought that, like other more or less decent headphones, it takes time to “play out”, I was wrong, a week later, in my case it’s a 30 + 30 minute drive to work at medium volume and 9 hours of lying in a box paired with a phone at full volume , had no effect. It's a pity, I expected more from Sony. From Sony, my wife has wired headphones, their price is 650, they play better. At the moment I have wireless Philips SHB5850, wired Sennheiser CX 200, Sennheiser CX 1.00, Panasonic RP-HJE125E-A (this is what I have to compare with) EVERYTHING, except for Panasonics (but their price is 8 frames below), play better than Sony WI-C400 I also use a headset, they seem to hear me normally (there were no special complaints) I think that I wasted my money in vain, since I personally don’t like the sound from these headphones.

img 1 attached to Sony WIC400/L Wireless Behind-Neck In-Ear Headphones, Blue review by Kenta Omura



Pros
  • Capacious battery Convenient management Ability to check battery charge Vibration during a call
Cons
  • A disgusting sound for its price, the middle and top are too pronounced, while the bottoms are extremely lacking. From time to time there is champing and squelching in the sound. In the cold season, "sausages" prevent you from fastening the collar to the end, and with a scarf, they generally begin to choke.

Comments (2)

Please, sign in to write a comment
December 20, 2022
In general, a cool copy is cool, the wires are strong, the sound is good, the collar does not press))
December 20, 2022
It's a pity that they have a problem with the iPhone. The sound is really great for the price.

Similar reviews