Review on Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM UD Lens: High-Quality Standard Zoom for Canon DSLR Cameras by Agata Kamia-Jabo ᠌

Glass was used in its place to represent the whale (18-55). The primary use for it is as a lens for everyday life, as well as travel and architecture. I required a wide-angle lens (10-22 was dismissed as very specific). I will say it one more: you need to have a crystal clear understanding of the purposes for which you are taking this glass or that drink. Yes, portraits taken on it are not the same as those taken on ice, but there are workarounds for capturing serious portraits and subjects (I personally have 50 1.4). Yes, you won't be able to chase after planes and birds while you're with him, but there are televisions for that. It is true that it is not quick, but! At least for me, the primary utility of this glass with its focal lengths is for taking photographs of travel during the daytime. And a hole of 2.8 is completely unnecessary for this purpose (this is if someone has a desire to overpay the top ten for 17-55). In order to take photographs at night, tripods were developed. Just so you know, the angle is fine for photography indoors and is even sufficient. dark? As a result of this, there have been breakouts for quite some time now. It is illogical to believe that by the light of a chandelier in your home you would be able to shoot children who will never stop whispering. This location and version 2.8 will not save. Considering the cost, the question itself is important in and of itself. I called two approved dealers before making my purchase. Several people truthfully stated that they possessed broken whale glass (7D) and demanded 24 dollars for it, despite the fact that they did not have an official Canon guarantee (but did have a guarantee from their repair center). The second merely stated, in reference to the infamous assurance provided by their support center, that they desired 26. After determining that it is possible to make a financial gain in this scenario, the glass was not purchased from the authorities for the price of 19.5 dollars because there is technically nothing to lose. This pricing strikes me as being appropriate. concerning the assembly, nothing is loose, nothing is hanging off, and there is no rattling. heavy, in general, particularly for those who did not hold Soviet optics in their hands and switched from whale glass)), but the lens is worth it for me personally.