Review on Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens - Optimized for Canon EOS SLR Cameras by Jagvir Singh ᠌

Justifies its price by 150%. Worth the money, even when they sold for 18,000-20,000. Now it’s really possible to find a new one for 13,000. (secondhand and even cheaper). As a feature, it is worth noting the dimensions: in the 300 mm position it becomes indecently long. The girls, out of habit, somehow mysteriously squint when it extends. The store compared with 55-250. At 70-300, the picture is nicer, as is the design, but to get acquainted with the range, it’s better to take 55-250 anyway - cheap and cheerful. For a semi-professional and for a long time, 70-300 is better. After buying 18-200, I began to use it very rarely, because. for most of my plots, 200 mm is enough, but it’s a pity to sell it for now. Recommendation for beginners. When shooting at the longest end, pay attention to what you are shooting through. For example, when you get out of the car in winter, move a little to the side, do not shoot through the warm air coming out of the passenger compartment. It seems like a trifle, but at a large approximation it will result in bands of sharpness and blur across the entire field of the frame - then you will look for problems in the lens.