Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ada Dymarska  photo
1 Level
155 Review
0 Karma

Review on Photo camera Nikon D7100 Kit AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G VR, black by Ada Dymarska

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The goods are normal, money is not wasted!

A camera that is fairly suitable for use in the house. But if we are talking about shooting at home, then there is no reason to carry a 7100 when you can use the same D7000 or 5000 series camera. After getting over my fear, I started investing in AF-C lenses (with built-in motors). To sum it all up, I spent 4.5 thousand dollars for a 50mm 1.8 AF-S lens for me, and that's all! I have not yet been successful in acquiring any of the other glasses. So I'm looking at manuals. Cropping is easier with 24 megapixels, however the enormous file size is a drawback of having such a high resolution. The size of the file is 30 megabytes. Using this camera made it quite clear that my cherished Tamron 18-270 f3.5-5.6 lens is no longer a good fit for me. He does not have a very sharp mind. In addition, I feel bad for having to purchase lenses that cost roughly the same amount as this camera, which is somewhere around 40,000 dollars. The question is as follows. Why spend your money on a camera that has to have expensive lenses if you're not going to utilize it for professional purposes? Due to the fact that its maximum working ISO ranges from 400 to 500 units, it will constantly demand additional light. If you add more, then the overall picture will get substantially worse. In most cases, I limit myself to shooting at an ISO between 100 and 200. Because these lenses are too weak for this camera, and then it makes no sense to buy it for such large ones (for me) money, I don't see much point in purchasing a 7100 with a whale lens that is at least 18-55, at least 18-105, and the like, costing up to fifteen thousand dollars, because this camera is too powerful for these lenses, and then it would make no sense to purchase it. I use this device day and night whenever I get the chance, however I've noticed that it has some shortcomings when it comes to processing photographs shot in low-light conditions. The color and lighting of the images taken with my older D40, which had 6 megapixels and was purchased in 2022, were identical. The only thing that was lost was the potential of framing it. Because the D7100 has 24 megapixels, you can easily crop (enlarge) a third of the frame to make it a full-size picture, and almost no one will even notice because there are so many pixels. This camera is appropriate for an affluent individual to use for photographing in general mode, but I found myself staring at the older BUS D300 and D700.

Pros
  • A decent piece of machinery for the price. Comfortable grip Convenient size Ergonomics\sScreen
Cons
  • Small buffer. Taking pictures of anything other than kebabs and 2022 salad is impossible, especially if you are using slow memory cards; after one or two Blurry frames, the gadget will think for a full five seconds. But, if you were to film a youngster jumping on an inflatable cow, the apparatus would not be able to keep up. It is not recommended to use an ISO value higher than 500. It's a touchy subject for me. When I first bought the camera, I generally dreamed of shooting at ISO 1600 (as someone wrote in the reviews), but 800 already ruins everything for me. I would like to work at ISO 1000 or higher. I was hoping for more in exchange for the noise. I really wish there was a second button for the shutter on the side of the camera.

Similar reviews