Photo camera Nikon D7100 Kit AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G VR, black Review

Although the camera is not the first freshness, but given the exchange rate, it will probably still be in demand. In fact, this camera is in no way inferior to its older brothers in terms of functionality, only that the crop. If one day the moment of buying a new camera comes, then, I am writing at the time of 2022, I would take the d850. For now, I'm satisfied with this)

Good camera overall. I used it at banquets with 4 flashes on racks in a circle and it's a thrill. Excellent ISO color did not raise more than 400. The main trouble of the camera is in low ISO values ​​​​(more precisely, the loss of detail on them)

In general, a wonderful model. But stuffing 24 pixels into it was a mistake - it makes noise not like a child. In this sense, the D7000 is preferable. But there is no FullHD video in it. Its pros: Looks solid. Fast and accurate focusing. A bunch of settings for all occasions. Ability to shoot using the remote control. Full HD video. Some cons: Personally, I see obvious noise already at ISO 400. This is not good at all.

A good and very successful model, in terms of functionality and quality, it slightly falls short of pro technology, and even overtakes some. I advise everyone ! Has some pros: The value for money is excellent! The ideal travel camera. The focus is excellent (not counting the focus during video shooting). Also, a large number of settings can not but rejoice. Its cons: Among the shortcomings, one can single out video recording, focus work and therefore the quality is lame.

Filmed on nikon d7100 for 3 years. Ambiguous opinion. Like it in landscape photography. I didn’t like it in terms of portrait shooting, the colors are not for everyone. In fact, each photo had to be picked in the converter. I ended up switching to canon.

If you get away from particulars, the main advantage of this camera is the machine gun. Those. whocomnsiders himselfcomol and is able to almost instantly adjust the camera (taking into account the optics on it at the moment! ), Based on the plot and shootingcomnditions (NOT studio shooting is implied), that ofcomurse does not need an automatic machine. But in real life, things are a little morecomplicated than the studios, and the brains of the automaton in this cell arecomrrect! Therefore, her

The first DSLR I bought, the impression is not the best. It's heavy and not easy to carry with you when traveling. The quality of the pictures is not very good, I think that a good phone or without a SLR camera will make this camera in terms of picture quality. To take a good picture on this camera you need to try. I have a micro 40 mm Nikkor lens, of course, not the most successful combination because the lens itself is quite sharp and the camera does not have a low-pass filter. In principle,

Of course, I would like a better picture for such money . The contraption requires the best optics, the best accessories. I didn’t notice much difference in quality with cameras from the 5th family. There is more convenient control of the camera. The pictures are too big. And the noise is a lot of noise. You pay that kind of money for the impressive size of a full-frame camera and ease of use!

A very successful camera, I can’t say anything about shooting video, since I shoot video very rarely. and it suits me personally. Has some pros Very light and comfortable in the hand, the picture and high detail and sharpness are beyond praise, but the camera loves expensive optics. But you can also make masterpieces with the inexpensive Nikon 50mm f / 1.8D AF Nikkor. With its cons. Auto focus sometimes smears, but I didn’t notice any obvious shortcomings, and the small clipboard and rate of…

In general, a nice camera, however it can be a little bit difficult to use. Only appropriate for use in indoor photography when using the flash that is built into the camera. The light sensitivity of the matrix is only slightly above average. Some pros: This camera, a very high-quality model with exceptional resolution, has been mine for the past three years. 1. The dynamic range is significantly wider than the one found on models from the 3000x and 5000x series, respectively. 2. A photograph…

In general, the impressions from the camera are the most positive. All buttons are at hand, everything is convenient. The picture pleases with colors and clarity. I use sigma 30mm f1.4 art lenses and a sigma 70-30 apo dg telephoto lens. And I don’t know troubles). The telephoto, by the way, opened up better on this camera than on 3100. Although I thought it would be worse because of the demanding matrix.

In general, a good camera, but a bit of a task. Suitable for indoor photography only with on-camera flash. The light sensitivity of the matrix is ​​rather weak. Some pros: I have owned this camera for 3 years, a very good model with excellent resolution. 1. The dynamic range is comparatively deeper than on the counterparts of the 3000x and 5000x series. 2. High resolution picture. 3. Convenient control 4. Additional display 5. Fits comfortably in the hand, high screen resolution. 6. 2 memory…

An excellent camera that is perfect for both an amateur and a professional on a budget. It is clear that Nikon decided not to cut sales of the reportage d300s and made a small buffer for the d7100, but this feature is managed by fast memory cards. In its class, the camera offers a tasty ratio of price / performance / quality / modernity. Due to the modern matrix without an AA filter and ergonomics, it will be relevant for more than one year, and an adequate autofocus system (similar to the d700

When versed, I did three tests over the course of two weeks. Because the option is so straightforward, I did not bother to open the instructions. If someone tells you that an activity is not appropriate for beginners, you should not believe them. You can figure it out. despite the fact that this is my very first digital SLR camera. In the years prior to that, in the late 1980s, I made use of Zenith. Before making a decision, I do a lot of research and study a lot of information. As a result, I…

The camera is very good too. Convenient to use. Not heavy. Alas, the breakdown upset me very much, especially since now the camera is very necessary, I wanted to practice in nature until it froze . my camera broke 2 days after the purchase. It seems like the exposure meter is covered. I handed it over to the store, I have been waiting for an answer for 8 days . They are fed breakfast, in general, it's a shame

I think the camera is very successful. There is an opinion that lenses will not reveal 24 megapixels, in practice it turned out that this is not the case. Both 18-105 VR and 70-300 VR give a very sharp picture. Probably the fixes will give an even more delicious result, we'll see :) Among the convenient features, one can note the almost complete customization of the camera for oneself, the presence of HDR, tenacious autofocus, a working auto-ISO and various other small "buns". Jpeg comes out of

The camera as a whole leaves a pleasant impression. She was very comfortable to use. The pleasant clatter of the shutter caressed the ear. But: 1. This is the first camera that failed 2. The main screen does not work 3. Pictures turned out to be corrupted The foreign trip was ruined. I brought few photos. They got corrupted. Droplets of oil from the shutter fell on the matrix. Now the camera is in the service center.

An excellent device, it’s very good with a whale lens, I thought it would be worse, with fixes it’s just super, the output picture almost does not require processing at 90%, 24 megapixels is a bit too much, of course, although if you cut the picture (crop) that’s it. A very good grip, the quality of the materials is on top, a lot of goodies (I liked the auto white balance with the preservation of warm shades, excellent for portraits). I worked before him, with many D3100, D5100, D5200 cameras…

The camera is cool, I liked it, the auto focus is good, but the most interesting thing is not faster than in the OM5 Olympus))) it's a joke, but it's not for nothing that the Olympus costs so much)))! In general, a good camera, for the video I put four. If you made a video in the camera, then make it as in the same Olympus or Sonya Nex! Has some pros It's a good camera! Good shots, but the whale 18-105 does not reveal a 24 MP matrix! But enough to get started! The viewfinder and display are…

In general and in general, the device is similar to the FF in terms of functionality, only the matrix is ​​​​smaller. Ideal for landscape painters. It is convenient to change all settings on the go with external buttons and wheels. This model makes sense to take if you want to do photography. If you need a "kebab" version of a camera for vacations, followed by shooting on a car, don't spend extra money, buy a good compact hyperzoom. The quality of vacation photos will be exactly the same, and…