A camera that is fairly suitable for use in the house. But if we are talking about shooting at home, then there is no reason to carry a 7100 when you can use the same D7000 or 5000 series camera. After getting over my fear, I started investing in AF-C lenses (with built-in motors). To sum it all up, I spent 4.5 thousand dollars for a 50mm 1.8 AF-S lens for me, and that's all! I have not yet been successful in acquiring any of the other glasses. So I'm looking at manuals. Cropping is easier with

Worked for Nikon for almost 10 years. First there was the D50, then the wonderful D300, and then this device, after which I say goodbye to Nikon. The camera can take good photos, especially landscapes. But, there are a lot of shortcomings. The buffer is clogged immediately, the series, consider it not. At ISO 1600 grain comes out, you can only work in emergency cases. White balance needs to be constantly corrected, especially indoors. Skin tones are creepy, gray-yellow. For whom the camera is…

Pretty good camera for home photography. But if we are talking about home shooting, then what's the point of taking a 7100 if you can take the same D7000 or 5000 series. I stopped being afraid of buying AF-C lenses (with built-in motors). Well, I bought myself a 50mm 1.8 AF-S for 4.5 thousand, and that's it! All other glasses are still unattainable for me. So I'm looking at manuals. 24 megapixels is good for cropping, but a large file size is also a disadvantage. The file weighs 30 mb. On this

I bought a nikon d3000 to replace it, after I suffered on trips with noise, autofocus glitches and an insufficient number of all kinds of settings. d7000 made me happy. But one problem emerged. When shooting at fixed in RAW, the picture is very sharp, even hurts the eye, as soon as you switch to high quality JPEG, the image becomes soapy. I tried all the picture control modes - increased both sharpness and contrast. All this helped very little, the sharpness is still not the same. Now I shoot…

I've been using it since New Years. I bought a kit with an 18-140 lens. for a long time choosing between the option from 16-85, but in the end I decided to choose the cheaper option. Although the wide angle is useful for narrow streets in Europe and landscapes. I am very pleased with the camera, it keeps a moving object in focus perfectly, really working ISO 800, everything above needs to be corrected in the editor. The only negative is the small size of the camera buffer, only 6-7 frames…

My husband gave me a camera! I am very excited! Before that there was a Samsung, the difference is indescribable! Pictures and videos are clear, accurate, bright. The device itself is light, the menu is convenient in it. I carry a camera everywhere and always, because I have small children, every moment, every breath of my babies is important! The workmanship is excellent! He fell many times and at least he needed such a strong, high-quality camera with small children! All in all satisfied!…

While versed, did 3t. test shots for 2 weeks. I did not open the instructions, the menu is very clear. So if they say. that this is not for beginners, do not believe. You can figure it out. Although this is my first digital SLR. Before that, I used Zenith. in the late 80s. IMHO: I read a lot of information before choosing. Therefore, I share who wants to buy a solid toy. who takes pictures, then this is Nikon 7100 ! Do not buy either 3. or 5 series. so that later you don’t bother with selling…

An excellent device, but only whose brain can move at least one step away from the "auto" mode, although in this mode everything is super both day and night (except for video), I installed 2 x 64 GB flash drives, with one micro SD through the adapter and both are class 10, everything flies, the declared lower operating temperature range is up to 0, I lowered it to -7 within an hour, I did not reveal any malfunctions during operation, in general I am satisfied and advise everyone. Fortunately…

I bought a whale from 18-140. The lens is completely satisfied. Universal kit for home and nature. But in the future, I still want to buy a TV set. Its pros: Convenience. The quality of the exposure, you don’t have to sit in Lightroom for a long time and edit photos, unlike Canon. Body ergonomics. Some cons: A little unusual control, because for 20 years I have been using Canon photographic equipment. But I got used to it and everything is fine.

In general, I am satisfied with the device. There are nuances, but given that the camera belongs to a semi-professional series, it requires good knowledge of the mat. part of photography. The whale lens obviously cannot give out all the technicality of the matrix, but it is quite suitable for mastering the device. Got pros: Semi-professional. Lots of manual tweaks. All important settings are available without entering the menu. A good stock of ISO (working up to 1600 units). A large number of…

Long accustomed to this model. Bought with an 18-140 lens. I did not notice any outstanding features - the camera is like a camera. Well, except that it focuses perfectly, well, that’s why it’s a DSLR. After 350 shots, spots in the viewfinder. Then the spots were also found in the photo. They didn’t accept it under warranty, only paid cleaning: matrix 1800r, viewfinder 8500r. I only cleaned the matrix, I didn’t clean the viewfinder for that kind of money, so I’m shooting with a stain.

who is in doubt, take it, don’t take it, I’m shouting to you! there’s nothing to think about, run to order, just check before buying for an official guarantee and back-front focus, anything can happen. Its pros: "you take a thing in your hands" well, it’s true, but seriously, the device is worthy, I honestly didn’t expect this, that it’s not a masterpiece)). The focus is like Velcro, tenacious and accurate! hits 10 out of 10, already disgusting))) whale 18-105mm. good, and quite sharp, in…

The device, on the whole, meets my expectations, and I have no complaints. There are subtleties involved, but considering that the camera is part of a semi-professional series, you should have a solid understanding of the technical aspects of photography. Even while the whale lens is not designed to reveal every intricate detail of the matrix, it is nevertheless an excellent tool for learning how to operate the gadget. Got pros: Semi-professional. Plenty of manual adjustments were made. You do…

The disappointment is complete. And the saddest thing is that on the previous Nikon D90, the focus flew past into the back focus, but there was not even an internal correction there. I thought it was bad luck, an accident. I got a new D7100. And what do I see? Front focus, and serious. I suffered for a week or two, took it to repair. The verdict - it is necessary to change the "autofocus" - I don't know what they mean by this and align the device. It looks like Nikon, how a serious brand is…