Shoot Like a Pro: Canon EOS Rebel T6 DSLR Camera Kit with 18-55mm Lens (Black) Review

Before that, I used soap, namely SAMSUNG ST-70. Therefore, I chose a SLR from scratch. I had no idea what is iso, crop factor, matrix, aperture, and so on. Went through all Nikon and Canon. Settled on this model. I bought it, took a couple of pictures, and for the next 2 weeks I didn’t let go of the camera. The camera is not professional level - perfect for beginners. I still use it, at the moment it has no competitors in this price category. TAKE YOU WON'T REGRET!

I won’t say that I am a professional photographer, but I understand something about it. I can say that this is one of the best "family" cameras today. Without professional bells and whistles, absolutely not needed for amateurs, but still a DSLR that takes very decent pictures. It is quite suitable for beginner photographers, not those who take self-shots and take pictures of checks and food in a cafe, but photographers in the old sense of the word. Very comfortable in the hands. The camera has…

a very good unit. was produced in 3 types with a whale 18-55 from 18-135 and 18-55 + 55-250, took 18-55, and bought 55-250 for it, a tripod, a flash, 2 softbox photos and tripods for them. radio synchronizer for working with software and flashes. softboxes are also equipped with flashes (all yongnuo flashes have not broken in 2 years and work perfectly), the background is white and wet asphalt with racks, and all this cost me 27 thousand, I was surprised that the camera "gobbled up" all this so

I've been using it for two months. My first camera ever, never photographed before. The device sits well in the hands. The whale lens is no good, it’s very dark to shoot indoors, the only thing is that there is autofocus and a stabilizer. Now I photograph mainly with Soviet optics. If you take an adapter for Soviet lenses, take it with a chip, it is very difficult to focus without it, especially with poor eyesight. I am very pleased with the camera. Basically, it's worth the money.

This is my first and only SLR at the moment. For three years of use, only the gum fell off the eye, but here it’s more likely a jamb in my negligence. I bought a camera for about $ 800, it's worth its money. If you take it in your hands for the first time, then everything will be clear even at an intuitive level. The rotary screen for macro photography is just something. Slow focusing speed is treated by disabling autofocus.

the mirror is great. I can say with full confidence that if you try, even on a Kit lens you can make a masterpiece (if, of course, you know about shooting modes other than automatic). I've been using it for two years now and there are no glitches or malfunctions! The battery holds its own, I personally get more photos than the manufacturer stated. It does not play, does not slow down, the appearance and performance have not changed at all. I use it mainly in M ​​mode - and I can’t complain…

Definitely more pluses than minuses. I repeat that if before that you clicked soap dishes or soap dishes of a larger level and size, then the device is just right. I also watched Nikon D7000 . It seemed more incomprehensible and mysterious, and even Nikon D7000 and Kenon 550 have a fixed display. I took it with a whale lens EF-S 18-135 IS - quite . Do not take it with 18-55 - there is nowhere to turn around. If you later become related to this camera, then you can change the lens to a more…

The three-digit canon series is the most balanced in terms of price / quality ratio. There are not enough stars from the sky. Somewhat expensive, equipped with an autofocus module, which is the same age as a mammoth and a rather old matrix from 7d. However, you can put magic lantern and get a lot of usefulness for video and manual focus lenses. In addition to this, you can screw the old (cheap) Soviet glass without any problems and enjoy

Great unit! I do not see much difference in the 650 and 700 models. The matrix is ​​the same. Touch screen? I do not need it for such an overpayment. For a beginner-lover, it is the most. There is a built-in image editor. Effects and other things can be done on the camera itself. Whale lens? Well, apparently I have nothing to compare, because this is my first DSLR. Photos come out great. I always shoot in manual mode. It is very convenient and quick to change shutter speed, iso, aperture, etc.

I bought it for myself in 2022 as a gift, at the time of purchase the price for the carcass was 16000, for the 40 mm 4000 lens and that 2022. Before it, I had a sony ultrazoom and I didn’t have enough of it, but it took very good pictures. I immediately refused the whale lens. The build quality is excellent, not very heavy, the image quality is excellent. The downside is that there is no stabilizer in the carcass, unlike Sony, and it is better to choose lenses with a stabilizer. I had a lot of…

The camera was purchased in September 2022. At first I couldn’t choose between Nikon 5000 and Kanan 600. When I tested Nikon, the pictures were good, but not very bright and were often blurry. But when I took the Canon 600, I immediately decided that I was taking it. The pictures are simple excellent, only the standard lens is not very good. But for a start it will do. Before that, I used the Canon EOS 550d, which is much worse. The 550 has problems with white balance, and the functions are…

Two stars removed only for a settling matrix. By the way, I went through 4 devices, tested everything, almost two hours, I chose it carefully; the difference between the most and "best" is almost 20 times in terms of hot pixels (two carcasses had one broken pixel each, and there are a lot of hot ones). There is enough rate of fire in the reportage. I took with two lenses in the kit 18-55 and 70-300 both the simplest ones, without stubs, for a start they are actually sufficient (if you want good

In general, an excellent camera. Many write that the lens collects dust, so this is easily solved with a protective filter. If you catch bunnies - a hood will help you. Whale 18-55 eventually ceased to suit, there is not enough light, range. The issue was resolved by buying a 50mm 1.8 portrait lens and a 70-300 zoom. But this is over time. For acquaintance with a SLR camera - a worthy model. Tons of possibilities. I have been studying for over a year and have not been disappointed. In the…

It shoots high-quality both in manual mode M and on AV, TV, P. The best BEGINNING-level DSLR, better and more convenient than Nikon's analog D5000. Also ideal for shooting family, children, dogs, cloud flowers, friends, girlfriends. Without an external flash and fast lenses, it takes professional pictures ONLY in bright light (sunny day, spotlights in the studio). Recently, the crop factor has been annoying. Incl. I advise those who are going to do photography to take a full-frame camera. ps

The camera for your start as an amateur photographer But not to be confused with "FBontakte And I'm in the kitchen, and the mulberries are on the beach, and there I'm drinking" if you want it - shoot it on a mobile phone or a soap box. Cheap and cheerful. I will comment on the previous post: ". you can shoot in JPEG ." It is already clear that such a comment is not worth reading, much less taking seriously. If you want to shoot in JPEG - take a soap box and go. Such a camera and the funds…

ph was purchased. summer 11. The first steps with it seemed very difficult, since before that there were only soap dishes that were photographed by pressing one button. as soon as the photo was taken out of the box, I immediately switched to "P", not for an automatic machine, I took such equipment. When the baby was born, we took pictures of him at home (we didn’t use the built-in flash so as not to blind the baby) there were both successful and unsuccessful shots (fuzzy blurry) all these…

I use 5 months. I chose between him and Nikon 5100. I chose Canon because of the more affordable accessories. I bought a 50 mm lens a month after purchase with a whale lens and now I don’t want to put the whale 18-55 back. With a fix, I like the pictures more. Included was a flyer for access to a free online school for photography. Very interesting for newbies like me. I am completely satisfied with the purchase, the quality of the pictures. I recommend!

For the New Year we decided to buy a camera as a gift for my son. Since we are not professionals in photography, we chose the camera on the recommendation of a friend. We use the camera a little. Comfortable to wear and not heavy. Easy to use, anyone can. The colors in the photo are not too bright, close to the original. We took it with us to nature, at first we thought bad shots would turn out in the cold, but everything turned out great. Before that, we used a regular Canon Power A 800 camera

As a beginner in the world of photography, I will say that the device is very good. I have been using it for a total of less than a month, and at first I took it from a friend and was very pleased with the photos, and now I decided to take it for myself. Studying the instructions for the camera, in a couple of days I understood a lot and found how to adjust the shooting parameters, I won’t say more because I’m still learning. I also want to say that you will have to buy a card separately, at…

If we compare cameras in the same price category, then it is better to take a used 5d mk1 than a 600d. It makes no sense to compare ff and crop in 5d, the only thing that depresses is a bad screen in 5d, and there are not many bells and whistles in the camera. I bought a 600-ku with 50 1.8, later I bought myself a + L-ku 70-200 f4 And I didn’t rejoice for a long time until I threw the ravens into lightroom, ISO 400 and Above, in principle, working, but the picture immediately becomes flat…