Good lens for the price. There are competitors. For example, Nikon 200-500, which costs a little more and the picture is a little nicer, as my colleague noted. There is also a Sigma 150-600 . but I don’t bother comparing lenses, otherwise I won’t have time to shoot. I bought the lens because Tamron gave it to me for testing a couple of times and I was satisfied. I tried the first version with another well-known photographer (which the Market forbids to mention in the review), who made this lens a good advertisement for the landscapes of South Moravia. Good dust protection. Several times I got into sandstorms, the sand crunched on my teeth, my eyes could not see anything. The eyes and teeth have cleared, and under the zoom and focus rings, the sand is still holding together, but it has not yet got to the lenses. I used it in winter in Altai in severe frost and in hellish heat (+50) in Kalmykia. The zoom ring travel is too large. It was inconvenient to shoot swans, I had to twist a lot and did not always have time to set the focal length and focus. For landscapes or shooting foxes, saigas and wolves will do. I didn't try to shoot airplanes. I can’t show full resolution frames, because everything is for sale. See special articles where they test and compare the lens. In the last photo G2 with a hood and foot and G1 without anything.
New Nikon 18-105mm Vibration Reduction 📷 Zoom Lens with Auto Focus for Nikon DSLRs
104 Review
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
Canon EOS SLR Camera Lens EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
124 Review