Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Ma En ᠌ photo
Taipei
1 Level
134 Review
243 Karma

Review on Black Canon PowerShot SX150 IS 14.1 MP Digital Camera with 12x Wide-Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 3.0-Inch LCD (OLD MODEL) by Ma En ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The product is the most common, it could be worse.

Before a trip to Turkey, Israel and Palestine in September, I bought a Canon SX 150 IS. A friend of mine had one like this, but 120. I liked it, especially the 150 later model. More megapixels and more zoom. In addition, it is compact, and consumes only 2 batteries or accumulators, and plus a lot of manual settings. In general, it shoots cool, quickly, without complaints. But when I looked at pictures from other cameras, about the same price class, and even in the old version. For example, a Fujifilm, for the same price, is Gromozsky. But the picture quality is much better. At what any. As I didn’t twist the settings on my kenon, everything is the same. It seems very high quality, but a newspaper photo. And Fujika has both depth and bright colors, and most importantly awesome sharpness. In general, if you do not compare, then it seems like it is not noticeable. And if you look at both, then from resentment for a more branded canon, a tear wells up. So in terms of Fujik take, as the rest of the road. My friend has a Kolpiks Nikon L 5 old. This is such an amateur fikulka, costing no more than 3 thousand today. And the quality of the frame does both. Sharpness and colors. For example, he shot in Hong Kong, so all the buildings are clear, and each brick is distinguishable at a great distance. Well, I'm not going to buy such a ficult. Fuji is better. And following on from the above, I thought maybe it was my camera so frail, but there is a good section on photos. Which is called "what they shoot." There fotiki with characteristics and pictures. So, kenons of a type like mine, and even nikons like l 810, with which stores are littered with - are removed so-so. Certainly not bad. But until you look at the pictures, for example, of any Fujika of about the same price class of 5-7 thousand. The difference is heaven and earth. So why are there a bunch of bells and whistles and manual settings, when you don’t twist them, the pictures are only of good quality. And on Fujika - excellent. I'm waiting for someone to buy, I'll add some money and take a fujik.

Pros
  • Appearance, high-quality assembly, compactness, large optical zoom, 2 AA batteries or rechargeable batteries.
Cons
  • Photo