Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Dimitar Kostakev ᠌ photo
1 Level
238 Review
0 Karma

Review on 🌟 Garmin Venu Sq NFC Smart Watch: Stylish Golden/White Design by Dimitar Kostakev ᠌

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

If you're not a paragliding runner diver but a regular city slicker who enjoys going for walks and participating in the local fitness group, this Garmin model appears to be the most cutting-edge option available. No hipsters or "Real Brutal Men" need apply; the design is straightforward and practical, and it tracks the basics (steps, pulse, and breathing). Correct sleep tracking is being done. From a "not for showing off, but for business" perspective, the Venu Sq is the most successful model in Garmin's lineup. The very first and only contender in my quest to replace my aging Vivosmart HR. You may quickly and conveniently order protective films and gles from AliExpress. P. When using the previous Vivosmart HR with the Sony WF-1000XM3 wireless headphones, there were many more pauses in the audio than with the Venu Sq. I don't know how it's supposed to function on the inside, but the fact remains.

Pros
  • Manufacturers are bucking the current trend toward circular displays "like in a real watch" in favor of the tried-and-true rectangular screen for a number of reasons, including the following: 1. The screen's contrast and brightness are optimized so that its contents can be read without difficulty. Two, it does a respectable job of keeping tabs on your heart rate, steps taken, air in and out, and different stages of sleep. All sudden increases in heart rate are accurately recorded, even during intense crossfit exercises. Ability to choose and choose which primary screen elements to display. When it comes to mobile apps, Garmin's offering is still among the most innovative. Five, you get a free two-year warranty if you buy from an authorized dealer.
Cons
  • One, the clock's light sensor is incongruously placed on the face, to the left of the display. This sensor, thus, is frequently hidden when the watch is worn on the left hand, even though the screen is clearly visible. The watch reports that it is still dark, and the screen brightness either does not increase at all, or climbs very slowly. Blood oxygenation levels are a very, very imprecise indicator of health. At low pressure (for example, during deep sleep), the readings can decrease to 90-92%, although a normal "clothespin" on the finger displays 99%. This is because the diode is not very powerful and it is difficult for it to shine through the skin. As it turns out, a range, rather than a single number, is what matters in the bracelet readings: if oxygenation is between 90% and 100%, then everything is good. It makes no difference how much intent there is. Third, the synchronization took a very long time. Ten hours of information, including a two-hour training session, can be communicated in three to five minutes. It took my old Vivosmart HR 20 seconds to do this. Recognizing exercises based on their curves 4. You can do the bench press and several cable pulls (both horizontal and vertical). Everything else is recognized at random, if at all. There is also a valid and wrong answer for the total number of repetitions. (Would it be so hard to have 100 individuals wear this kind of watch, compile the data, and teach neural networks to recognize?) To my knowledge, however, no bracelet has yet been able to do this normally. For that price, I'd expect wireless charging. Six, a branded app store to say hello from the year 2022. Designed in such a way that its nonexistence would be preferable. In what contexts could you use your model? What criteria can be used to narrow down available apps? How can I learn the app's functionality quickly? They look like they were designed for aesthetics rather than functionality.