Review on Smartphone IIIF150 B1 Pro 6/128 GB, Dual nano SIM, black by Adam Walendzik ᠌

Hi all! This device was purchased at the beginning of October this year for 16990 in the company's online store. I made a choice towards secure smartphones after I drowned my previous device. Of the two modifications of this model, I decided to take the more equipped one. The presence of an IR camera and a higher resolution of the main one bribed me, and the difference of 3500 for these additives seemed insignificant. When I took the device in my hands for the first time, I was very pleased with almost everything. Build quality, appearance, display with excellent color reproduction and sensor sensitivity. In general, there was no feeling that the money was wasted. The device really gives the impression of a reliable and protected smartphone, so on the very first weekend, without any fear, I immersed it under water and tried the underwater shooting mode. There were no consequences, he withstands diving. The battery capacity was also impressive: after the first charge, the device worked for 7 days in high activity mode. The night vision camera works perfectly, it takes good quality BW pictures in complete darkness, you can also shoot video. Well, now about the shortcomings. I was immediately embarrassed by the resolution of the main camera - 48 MP does not smell there! In general, I don’t notice the difference between the photo of the main and front camera, although only 8 MP is declared for the front camera. Then problems began with the plug of the charging socket. After the 3rd charge, it became very bad to close, it began to fly out. In the end, after 2.5 months, it stopped closing altogether. How waterproof the phone is without this plug is a big question. But it is obvious that now I will not immerse it specially under water. Also, in the process of two months of use, a huge number of scuffs and scratches appeared on the body (both on metal and plastic parts), which indicates a low quality of the paintwork. Well, another disadvantage for me was the lack of a 3.5 connector, and a simple adapter with type-c does not solve the problem. You need a DAC, but it's more expensive. Of course, in the era of BT headphones, this is not critical.