Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
goodyear eagle f1 asymmetric 3 225/55 r17 97y summer logo

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer Review

25

·

Average

Revainrating 4 out of 5  
Rating 
4.0
Automotive, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories, 🏎️ Car Emblems, 🚗 Exterior Car Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(20)
img 1 attached to Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer
img 2 attached to Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer
img 3 attached to Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer
img 4 attached to Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer

Description of Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer

225/55R17 97Y Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3*MOE TL FP ROF Summer tires Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 designed for powerful sedans and sports cars belong to the UHP (Ultra High Performance) tire family. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 has high efficiency, short braking distances and excellent handling on dry and wet roads. Thanks to the use of high-tech solutions in the creation of the tire, Goodyear has achieved high performance, extended service life and energy efficiency. Grip Booster Technology The new Grip Booster compound with a traction compound has brought the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 to a new level of dry and wet traction and braking performance. Its feature is the presence of specially added adhesive resins that improve the grip characteristics of the tread with the road surface. Active Braking Technology The use of the patented Active Braking technology for modeling the area of ​​the contact patch provided a significant reduction in the braking distance. This technology is based on the original structure of the tread blocks that increase the grip area with the road when braking. This increases the contact of the tire with the road, which in turn shortens the braking distance, both on wet and dry roads. Reinforced Construction Technology The new Reinforced Construction carcass provides the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 with improved handling characteristics, high wear resistance, fuel economy and confident handling of high-speed corners. The frame consists of modern ultralight and strong components providing a high degree of strength and effective resistance to deformation under loads at high speeds.

Reviews

Global ratings 25
  • 5
    14
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    3
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Beyond praise! The product definitely deserves your attention.

I took contisportcontact 3 235/45 R17 instead of staff on the trade wind, before that I had experience with pirelli pzero of the same dimension, compared to conti and pirelli, quiet (at any speed) and moderately soft rubber, loses a little in taxiing, small irregularities swallows with a bang, I still can’t say for wear, but it’s declared as wear-resistant, according to my personal feelings, in general, it outperforms both Conti and Pirelli, especially considering the price, I think in terms of

Pros
  • quiet, soft, not expensive
Cons
  • not revealed

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Unsuccessful purchase, I am disappointed.

Immediately for those who want to advise me to change the car - I have a German worth 4 million (and so advise the owners of Bentley) Conti skated on it for three seasons - only one thing did not suit - the water track. I read the reviews and decided to take this miracle for myself, after 1000 km of run I realized that I had to believe the few, but truthful negative reviews . . So (1) (not critical) - noise, this rubber is noisy even on my car. (2) (critical) - the track is not even significant

Pros
  • German production
Cons
  • Unpredictable behavior on a rutting road.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Never buy this product.

Damn finished! I got with the car! Everyone who writes here about handling, etc. , etc. , simply did not drive on normal tires! Do not buy in any case, get tired of driving to tire shops! Not for our roads, very tender! Given its price, it is not clear why it is needed at all . .

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not the best quality, but overall not bad.

After reading the positive reviews here, I decided to save a little and take these tires instead of the usual Kontik / Bridge, size 225/45 R17. Savings went sideways, spent on tire fitting was more than the difference in price. There are no complaints about the handling of the tires, on dry pavement it is perfect, on wet it is quite normal, the tendency to hydroplaning is minimal, the braking distance is short. But why do these tires get such high marks for durability and wear resistance? In…

Pros
  • - price - manageability
Cons
  • - strength - wear resistance

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Full compliance with the manufacturer's assurances, high quality.

235/45 R17 94Y Sedan, rear-wheel drive, 218 hp Pumped first 2.7 bar. It was terribly thrown in a rut, it began to buzz. I blew it to 2.5 and happiness came. Despite not the highest profile, quite soft. Noise appears appears after 40 km / h, but when speeding up, it almost does not increase. It accelerated to 190 km / h - it holds the road perfectly, you can steer with one finger. The soft sidewall is a weak point. The first serious bump and immediately a hernia (Well, this is the price of…

Pros
  • Soft, fairly quiet (but not the quietest). Well holds a wet road and even snowy spring porridge. Holds speed very well
Cons
  • Sidewall is too soft. A month later I caught a hernia and bent the disc

Revainrating 2 out of 5

The purchase was not worth it at all.

Describing my usage experience.With its pros: Every day the impression of tires is changing for the worse. Has cons: Marriage comes across, as well as a weak sidewall

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best product I have ever reviewed, I recommend it to everyone!

Drove 1,000 km - city and highway, Goodyear tires are very soft, so it's scary. I was driving along the highway in heavy rain - the tires are stable, I didn’t feel rutting (I was driving along the M-2 to Hong Kong), once I hit a puddle - so the tires dispersed the water, there was no aquaplaning, I drove like on rails, 140 km / h. Returned in the evening the temperature dropped to +3 and the speed had to slow down, maybe the tires are purely summer. Tires chose 2 months. I want to add…

Pros
  • Tires Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 SUV 235/65 R17 104W bought on 09/29/2022, on a VOLVO XC-90 diesel car, bought with tire fitting, tires 52/16g, made in Germany, before that there were regular Continental. The difference from Goodyear tires is significant, they ride like on rails, they don’t scour, they don’t roll, there is no aquaplaning, rutting is not noticeable, they brake much better, the braking distance is shorter. When driving a car on these tires, I enjoy driving.
Cons
  • On a dry road there is a rumble from the wheels. It is not recommended to run road tires on grass. I'm afraid for the sidewall, maybe the tires are soft. I want to add information after 3 seasons of operation and about 20,000 km of run: I was afraid that the rubber was soft - it happened 1-3 times a year I go beyond Hong Kong to Kharabali to fish about 3,000 km round trip. At the same time, the car was decently loaded by weight. In short: the cord in the wheels parted and one wheel descends along the inside in 9 places, almost along the entire perimeter. The rest of the wheels refused to balance for tire fitting, maybe it's pointless due to the fact that the cord broke. It is a pity that the wheels lasted so little.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like the product, it fully meets my expectations.

The comment refers to the Passat CC. Before that, there was a Bridgestone Potenza S001 235/45 R17 97Y, which is pretty tough and noisy, but keeps very well on turns, the steering wheel is very informative. But the noise still finished - clearly audible when the car reaches a speed of 60 km / h. On the new GoodYear, a similar noise appears at ~ 90-95 km / h. At 130 km / h in terms of handling and rutting, the difference is not visible - both rubbers hold perfectly. Let's see how much it will…

Pros
  • Soft, quiet, good rolling (reduced fuel consumption), no aquaplaning (so far new), price (6090 in 74kolesa. ru)
Cons
  • Not yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Good quality product, the price is commensurate with the quality.

Replaced Goodyear grip 2. Couldn't ride it. Oak. holds the road well but in the carGul as in the plane. The noise in the car is excellent Mercedes E 350 w 212. The winter one didn’t make so much noise, I couldn’t stand it. I put the needle f 1 245 \ 45 \ 17 Y99. First impression is very good. Much quieter. Just 10 times. But softness affected the management. Not a lot of roll machine has become. not so sharply responsive to the steering wheel. But now I don’t feel cracks and gouges. Let's see…

Pros
  • Very soft and quiet.
Cons
  • The machine does not roll much

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A wonderful product, its nice to use.

Mazda 6 2022 2.5l 192 hp front-wheel drive, changed shoes on 04/22/2022, the latest model, asymmetric 3. Hook, braking, water - everything is super! For those who love speed and handling - your option! On bumps, stiffness is 4 out of 5! But I have a fairly heavy car and stiff suspension compared to crossovers and premium sedans. The set with free installation and annual warranty service cost 35 but I am satisfied and I hope that my review will help someone decide. I chose between continental…

Pros
  • Quiet, tenacious, moderately tough at the same time and strong, beautiful powerful tread, responds well to near zero temperatures, does not require break-in.
Cons
  • Price (but we pay for quality! ).

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I am writing about p18 235/45 excellent tenacious tires and no matter what the weather is like on the street, whether it be rain or dry asphalt, you are completely safe on it. Compared to Conti Premium Contact and Michelin Primis, it will be the most expensive, but also better in corners, better at speed, better when changing lanes. Relatively quiet if it is good asphalt, if not, then alas, everyone will hear. The only thing that is not pleasant is that it is soft - a strong blow to the pit…

Pros
  • Tenacious on bends, excellent on the track in the rain or in dry weather, soft, relatively quiet.
Cons
  • the main disadvantage is the price and its wear and tear. soft. Season 3 won't last.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The average product, you can find a better one.

I regret buying these tires. I was seduced by reviews, people write that they are very quiet, soft. I was specifically looking for a replacement for the regular hankook on kia, they are very oak. We needed the quietest. Yes, they are a little softer, and that's it. The noise is almost the same, even the rumble is of some kind, the rolling is bad, it feels like you are pulling someone, or very heavy. I threw out 27 thousand in vain. Or maybe on our roads all the tires will make noise, I don’t…

Pros
  • regular tires
Cons
  • Noise

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good and high-quality product, but there are disadvantages.

225/45/18 + 255/40/18 runflat If you need a ride like on rails, then this is not her forte. Due to the soft sidewall, an excellent level of comfort is achieved - it is a pleasure to move the rails, so to speak. But when changing lanes to 100+ on a low profile (! ) And on a run flat (! ) the rubber adds a “jelly” effect to the car in the transverse direction, it is especially felt on the track. Feelings are far from comfortable, it seems that the car should already be "caught". At the same…

Pros
  • Comfortable, excellent road holding, excellent braking.
Cons
  • The effect of "jelly" when rebuilding at 100+ (see comment(

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

Goodyears breathe in the back of the head of the premium winners bears, kontiks, Nokian. For the money, a better choice than these winners. I think, having given that kind of money for them, I definitely regretted the purchase, because. Kontiki and Nokian have similar softness of the sidewall and low and weak mileage. If I would choose to buy tires again, I would buy Goodyears again without a doubt, and the model of an efficient grip performance is also possible. And the bears cost money…

Pros
  • Stability, handling on dry and wet pavement, but only at positive air temperatures up to + 5-10 degrees. Despite the softness, I think the mileage will also be good. I passed 13 thousand on tires, even minimal wear is not visible, compared with Nokian Haka Black, then 6 would already be visible on them.
Cons
  • Compared to the stock Michelin Primasi 3 st 225/50/17, the noise level on a rough surface is higher, the controllability when maneuvering at speeds over 160 km / h is worse, the soft sidewall. At a temperature of +5 and below, they tan, warming up is needed to get softness. Tires have passed 13 thousand, even minimal wear is not visually visible, I think the mileage will be normal. If compared with Nokian Haka Black, for example (had operating experience) it would already be 6. Yes, and the sidewall is the same, but there are no comments on handling.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best price for this product, will buy more!

Great road holding in any weather, hydroplaning is not noticed. The driving style is relatively aggressive and despite the fact that the rubber is soft, the wear is still adequate. They drive comfortably and the car is predictable in all conditions.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I'm very happy, it really is worth buying.

Car bmw 528 xdrive f10. My kit is made in Germany, I don’t know how tires from other countries behave. It seemed that they are a little wider than the previous ones, this is due to the side that protects the disc, most likely. Tires are excellent, I recommend them to everyone. 245/45r18 runflat , 275/40r18 runflat With its pros: Handling is excellent, the car holds very well. The track is no longer a problem. Everything is great in the rain. Got cons: Have not found . Maybe only noise for 4 out

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

I took a car on which such tires were installed, the mileage was about 400 km, I drove another 3,000 in a month, including long distances, and was satisfied. Changed to winter tires yesterday. It's too early to talk about wear resistance, I'll tell you next season. As a result, I’ll say that the rubber band costs a lot, of course, but if you are looking for a good grip and handling, this is your option.

Pros
  • Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 245/45 R18 100Y Runflat, used on Alfa Romeo Brera Worst hook. I didn’t have time to check the dynamics with the technique, but it feels like the car is going faster than according to the passport. Excellent handling. On the 18th discs with a rubber height of 45 and a width of 245, there is no trace of roll at all, apparently other reviewers have rolls, not tires, but suspension. In corners comes at a very good speed without drift. Stops just fine in both dry and rainy weather. Rubber is very quiet and at high speed too.
Cons
  • The bumps in the road with a rubber height of 45 are quite strongly felt compared to the winter 55th Velcro TOYO Garit Giz. In front of speed bumps I slow down almost to a complete stop. Unlike other reviews, I note that the track goes so-so.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are a few bugs, basically the norm.

Stood in stock on a new car. At about 4 thousand kilometers, a hernia appeared on the front left wheel. The authorized dealer over the phone refused to replace the tire under warranty. I had to buy a new one. With its pros: Under normal urban operating conditions, I do not see any obvious advantages. Winter tires of another brand of the same size are noticeably more comfortable, softer and quieter. Different cons: The hernia came out after 4 thousand kilometers. Subjectively noisy. Subjectively