Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Boyan Borissov ᠌ photo
1 Level
274 Review
0 Karma

Review on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 225/55 R17 97Y summer by Boyan Borissov ᠌

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

Goodyears breathe in the back of the head of the premium winners bears, kontiks, Nokian. For the money, a better choice than these winners. I think, having given that kind of money for them, I definitely regretted the purchase, because. Kontiki and Nokian have similar softness of the sidewall and low and weak mileage. If I would choose to buy tires again, I would buy Goodyears again without a doubt, and the model of an efficient grip performance is also possible. And the bears cost money, respectively . . although they also have complaints about handling, especially on wet surfaces

Pros
  • Stability, handling on dry and wet pavement, but only at positive air temperatures up to + 5-10 degrees. Despite the softness, I think the mileage will also be good. I passed 13 thousand on tires, even minimal wear is not visible, compared with Nokian Haka Black, then 6 would already be visible on them.
Cons
  • Compared to the stock Michelin Primasi 3 st 225/50/17, the noise level on a rough surface is higher, the controllability when maneuvering at speeds over 160 km / h is worse, the soft sidewall. At a temperature of +5 and below, they tan, warming up is needed to get softness. Tires have passed 13 thousand, even minimal wear is not visually visible, I think the mileage will be normal. If compared with Nokian Haka Black, for example (had operating experience) it would already be 6. Yes, and the sidewall is the same, but there are no comments on handling.