Review on Smartphone Samsung Galaxy J3 (2016) SM-J320F/DS, black by Kiril Darakchiiski ᠌

I had two phones of this model, both without marriage. Can I recommend this model for purchase for the money that is asked for it? Definitely not. The price of this Samsung is a maximum of 5,000, with such performance and a camera. Has pros: Good battery performance (if you do not use 4G) Juicy, amoled matrix. Good build. Nice design Has some cons: No. 1. Performance. The Spreadtrum SC8830 processor can be called frankly wretched, its real performance is at the level of the phone 4s processor of 2022, it hardly pulls out even ordinary applications like yule or vk, it often freezes in them if you give a little gas in the form of loading images into the application, etc. . It is built on a 32-bit architecture, and is only suitable for the lightest games and undemanding programs. Mali 400 is responsible for the video, an ancient vidyuha, which is installed in devices of the lower price segment for 4000 thousand. No. 2. Camera The camera is terrible, both the main and the front, autofocus is only in the characteristics, in fact it is not. The front camera is only suitable for Skype, there can be no question of any selfie here. N3. Headphone sound. Tested with different headphones, different types. Everywhere the sound was somehow pale, poor. The sound quality enhancement functions in the settings do not have any effect. The sound is unbalanced, there is no clear middle, no highs, no lows, just mess. No. 4. Software ates. In 2022, there were rumors that the samsung j3 2022 is on the list of devices that will receive an ate to Android 6, that's it, that's coming soon. A lot of time has passed and, as usual, according to its original traditions, Samsung put a bolt on this model . Well, it remains to say thanks to Samsung for such a reverent and warm attitude towards its customers.