Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Bogdan Panov ᠌ photo
1 Level
245 Review
0 Karma

Review on Smartphone Xiaomi Redmi 10 2022 4/128 GB Global, Dual nano SIM, carbon gray by Bogdan Panov ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is absolutely worthless, don't buy it.

This is how I feel about the S21. I believe it looks great and the way everything is displayed inside the case is quite classy. Stunning, that Phantom Gray. This gadget was a big hit with me. This leads me to my next point. The "premium segment" of the phone market guarantees me "quality!" calls. The experience put me in the shoes of a beta tester from the past! According to market standards, your Smartphones are priced similarly to Apple's iPhone. However, the quality of what you offer is inferior. Certainly, and it has nothing to do with Apple's iOS or Google's Android. Now we're talking about Samsung-branded software and services that your organization creates and maintains. ADVERTISING Samsung's ads are embedded throughout the content. A "screenshot" is included with this review. Clicking the 'Internet Samsung' browser's line will launch a window displaying an ad for 'poisk. Ru' (mail. Ru), which may be closed by closing the window. In addition, there is no way to disable this window in the preferences. It has been brought to my attention that paid Samsung to preload its search app on Android. Google also makes a payment to Apple. Everyone just sticks with whichever search engine they like most. But why do I also see advertisements for "popular search queries" from mail. Ru while I'm using the built-in applications? - I'll say it again: you won't find an option to disable the advertising plate in the preferences. To put it another way: you want me to pay around $1,000 for your device, and then I have to watch commercials within your apps? Will I make another purchase of a Samsung smartphone? In a word: Hell, No! We appreciate everyone's time and interest.

Pros
  • After four days using the device, these are the initial impressions. Regular web browsing, camera testing, and phone calls were the extent of the phone's use. It describes my time spent with this fantastic tool. Unlike the iPhone 12 (although I thought I would get an iPhone 12), I immediately liked it when I saw and felt it in the Store, thus I ended up purchasing the S21 to give Samsung a try:) The phone rests easily in the palm of your hand. Unlike the iPhone XS (XR) and similar devices, you won't have to worry about dropping your device because of the feeling that you're holding slippery glass. Instead of being a slick plastic, "polycarbonate" is more akin to glass. (I don't bother with a case for my phone.) Because of its manageable width, it may be used with a single hand. The length of it. You know that your hand will be intercepted if you try to reach the very top of the screen in this game. Fluent user experience at 120 Hz! Performs admirably on the built-in fingerprint reader. In this case, unlocking using your face is fine. Facial unlocking does not work in dim light. One useful feature is the ability to set it such that "when unlocking by face - immediately open the main screen." In order to return to the home screen on an iPhone, you must swipe. The photo suggests that it does not unlock as quickly as the S10e did at launch, which is fantastic news. The iPhone's Face ID system is superior. High-quality daylight shots. Clear video. Magnificent display. However, the color calibration is so off that you'll have to "pull out your eye," and it works best only with "natural colors." Even though both screens are manufactured by Samsung, I find that the iPhone's is better calibrated for color. such as this!
Cons
  • Just so we're clear, I won't be compiling a "likes and dislikes" list; instead, I'll be limiting myself to discussing just visually apparent flaws. - using the camera (and producing video) in a dimly lit room with a single table lamp As soon as a regular light source enters the frame, the video returns to its natural, fluid state, as if the frame rate had fallen from 30 to 5 or 10 frames per second. Using a Camera in Low Light (Photos) When the "Camera" app is launched and the "Photo" shooting option is chosen, noticeable latency appears on the screen "as if the fps drops from 30 to 5 - 10 fps" in low light conditions. Even in dim light, the iPhone performs flawlessly. just like clockwork:) Turning on the "Camera" app on a smartphone can make the screen bright enough when you're in a dim room where a table lamp is only a couple of meters away. However, minimizing the "Camera" app causes the screen's sufficiently strong brightness in the "Adaptive mode" to change to less bright. (in other words, it's not easy on the eyes!) Please, whoever at Samsung is in charge of making these features work, have a look at how the iPhone handles boosting its brightness. A lot more could be said, but I think these two examples adequately illustrate why, eight months after the release on January 14, 2022, such blatant and, in my opinion, serious issues remain unfixed. consulting experts from "Samsung" via online chat. They said that using the camera and the "Adaptive mode adjustment" to significantly boost the brightness of the image was routine procedure. That's the way things ought to be: