Review on MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 SUV 255/50 R19 107T winter by Micha Kamierczak ᠌

Name: MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 SUV 255/50 R19 107T winter
Item: MICHELIN X-Ice North 4 SUV 255/50 R19 107T winter
Rating: 3

July 04, 2023

Not everything is so bad, the average purchase in quality.

HAKA 5 came before it. I can't say how old she was, but it was at least two years ago that the spikes migrated out of their natural habitats together. After conducting a stud, I concluded that the issue was resolved. But history shows that he usually just wastes the cash. Not because they are getting old, but because rubber's properties have shifted, spikes are abandoning their promised locations en masse. Putting studs on the rubber helps with one issue, but we can't overlook the fact that regular tires have about as much traction as a piece of plastic.
I was forced to replace it with a whole new model. After six months of research, I made the decision to purchase the legendary BEARS in their original size of 235/60 R18. Shipping, setting up, and following all the norms. I sped off for a quick spin outside of town. Valkost was the first thing I picked up on. Even though FRIL is not pneumatic, it shares the softness of the rubber. So, it tasted like jelly from the fruit nanny, if only there had been more rainbow pancake. Started up in the pre-game after being overclocked to 100. The automobile hardly started, despite his best efforts. The moose test is typically not recommended in this situation. The feelings are novel and intriguing, but I'm not interested in them. Making the switch to RR's Evoque. EVOK vehicle has a very rigid and precisely tuned suspension. She was shod in BLIZZAK Spike-01 BRIDGES. My only gripe was that she was too rigid. Therefore, I concluded that this was the most prudent course of action. Switched to a firm rubber on FRILLA and a softer rubber on EVOK. Not everything was perfect, but EVOKE ultimately made the travel more pleasant, if slower.

This rubber "didn't fit" for me, but it could be because of the way, the object, or the terrain that I was riding. This is my personal, concluding opinion:
A great tire for a peaceful ride at legal speeds.
LR's tire for the auto sector is a pretty mediocre product of that union.
I would not have taken it if I had known all this beforehand. I hope you have safe travels!

Pros

Cargo capacity: LR FR 2 + RR Evoque. Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug's primary ecosystem. The rubber is as pliable as a ball and is soft in all directions (under the tread as well as on the sides). Having less than ideal directional stability, this is a benefit for the city but a drawback for the highway. Only the exceptional traction on packed snow stands out as a positive feature. In addition, the turn-in, acceleration, and braking grip are all great. As for the rest, they perform about as well as other tires in this price range.

Cons

The volume of the noise varies with the rate of the motion. The invention of a silent studded tire is a miracle that has yet to happen. On powdery snow, it rows just like the other tires in its category. It's also passable in the rain and perhaps even superior to others. On dry pavement, it's fine. But the grip let me down when I tried to use it on a glass road. The prior BRIDGE who was up there was superior. On BEERS it already carries 60, but I went through curves on it at speeds that not everyone could accomplish in the summer. And all four wheels are always shining under acceleration. This is disappointing; I was hoping for more from such a renowned rubber. Again, the issue of directional stability arises when traversing inter-row ice or porridge, which necessitates continual catching of a car. The reduced breadth of the treads is another issue. Only 180 mm, although KHAKI, BRIDGE, and PIRELLI all provide 200 mm in this size. Too bad, but at least we'll be eating out less. Maybe. I'm hoping this is its intended function.