Review on 🧦 PJ Masks No Show Socks for Boys by Pavel Craig

It seems to me that non-slip grips on the bottom of socks should be the obvious "ALWAYS" for makers of socks this tiny, but they don't have them. They are slippery on parquet floors and are only suitable if the child is not yet walking, only walks on carpet or immediately puts on shoes over the pattern. You are very thin. There is no extra padding on the soles and toes. They are very similar to summer socks, thin, stretchy and short, so more suitable for sneakers than boots. The interior is unlined as I have sometimes seen with woven character socks. There are many loose threads of characters and patterns on the inside of these socks. I'm not sure if they're really worth it for the price. Especially in the X-Small size, which is basically the size of a child's sock. I put them on a 2 year old and they ONLY fit when I actually put them on him and that is before they have been washed or dried. They are probably best suited for children aged 1 year and younger. At the age when this size of children's socks fits, children can hardly recognize or express a desire to wear PJ Masks brand socks, so in some respects it is not necessary to have them. character socks. I think at this age it's better to spend the money on safer,