For your money, if you take a worthwhile thing from the listing, especially for portraits and everyday photos, a reportage. In landscape shooting, although the colors are good, the overall picture is rather trivial, correct and boring. Got pros: Build quality, everything is tight and without backlash-elk after all. Lightweight and compact. The quality of the picture, especially for portraits, has its own volume and plasticity, micro-image of optics, contrast. Good sharpness on FF and crop up to 10 megapixels. Some cons: The sharpness is not ideal, again, the micro-pattern of the optics adds its own artifacts to the image - slight roughness, "dirty" shades in dark areas. In landscapes, the picture is rather ordinary, even flat. On a crop of 18 megapixels, there was some kind of soap in general, I don’t know why everyone wants it for a new crop, they want it until they buy it, then they sell it from their hands . The fact is that plastic elements are used in the circuit, how is it elka?! And so, the manufacturer will never make life seem like a paradise, because it is necessary that they lay out money for 24-70 2.8, marketing .
Nikon 50mm f/1.8D Lens: Perfect for Nikon DSLR Cameras!
97 Review
Black Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens - Model 1380C002
78 Review
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens - Compatible with Canon DSLR Cameras (Lens Only)
73 Review
Nikon 35mm f/1.8G Auto Focus Lens for Nikon DSLR Cameras - Black (Model 2183)
125 Review