Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Haruto Asahi ᠌ photo
Tokyo
1 Level
118 Review
169 Karma

Review on TP LINK TL WR940N Wireless External Antennas by Haruto Asahi ᠌

Revainrating 1 out of 5

The product is not good, I will not buy any more.

First things first, let's get everything and TP-link in particular in order. I needed a new router to replace my old D-link DIR-320, which has served me well for more than three years and is still functional today; however, the antenna on the DIR-320 cannot be removed, and it does not provide sufficient power for a two-room apartment. About 940 model. The Internet was not distributed at the time of my wedding. Even though he was phoning the wizard, dancing with a tambourine, and enlisting the assistance of the system administrator, he was unable to connect to any of the available networks. The service provider has verified that there are no issues with the router's ability to exchange packets with it. As a consequence of this, I took it back to the shop and instead purchased the 842N, which had received positive feedback from a number of customers. Which resulted in the provider's dynamic settings not being accepted by the system. As a direct consequence of this, I bring it with me to the store and buy it. This is the very first time in all of my experience that both of my routers have turned out to be G. As a result, I will not advise anyone to purchase items from this manufacturer. Who can say how long it will continue to affect you? Not aware of any other options at this time.

Pros
  • Coverage region that is stylish, despite the fact that 842N catches, as it turns out, no worse
Cons
  • Internet access is not shared; it is readily polluted.