WiFi router TP-LINK Archer AX73, black Review

The router is just top! Seriously, without stupid advertising, this is just an unrealistic router, especially for its price. Before buying, I read a lot of reviews here on . I filtered by negative ones and was surprised that some write about frequent reboots of the router, signal interruption, etc. - guys, you just got a marriage, why write a negative review right away. The manufacturer provides a 4-year warranty for this! Just change it to work. Marriage and among iPhones comes across among…

Before that, I had an Archer 1200 v1 router and, in principle, suited everyone, with the exception of the coverage area and signal strength. In the back room, the signal disappeared, I had to do it through a repeater (but it cuts the speed). I read the review of this router, I was interested in support for wi-fi 6, higher speeds, new encryption protocols (WPA3), the presence of as many as 6 antennas, the appearance again. I looked at the price - 7K, acceptable for me, I saw "gaming" routers for

More WiFi-6 technologies are involved here than, for example, in AX20, so there are nuances when using old clients and new ones at the same time. As I understand it, the old ones most of all dislike switching to some channels - they simply cannot connect to the network for quite some time. It is solved by forcibly setting the channel on which all devices work. Perhaps the DFS mechanism does not get along well with old clients . However, I've been using it for several days, perhaps I haven't…

I especially liked the one mesh technology - signal extenders united into one network with a router. Parental control is top, but some features are available by subscription. Free: Website blocking, Content filter, Bedtime. Paid: Time limit and shutdown time. Subscription 4290r per year. As a hard drive I use - HDD TOSHIBA Canvio Basics 2TB. To play files, I use the VLC player application. 4K movies from the hard drive loads without problems. Unfortunately, the router does not show the free%…

Impressions yes this moment positive. But a huge residue remained from the outdated version 1.0. It is necessary to read the ZOP, whether an outdated version is a reason for a return.

Great router! Good value for money. I advise those who have 3-room apartments and houses. I break through 3 concrete walls - the TV in the kitchen holds an HD picture without any problems when watching Internet TV.

Constant reboots of TP-LINK got tired, as a result I bought a Beelink mini-PC on a 4-core Celeron N5095 2GHz (2.9GHz) and a TP-LINK TL-SG108E switch with VLAN support and made a router on them. As a result, the router turned out to be quite expensive, but a 4K TV is connected to it, you can work and watch YouTube. The Archer AX73 itself is used in AP (Access Point) mode. It should be noted that the router turned out under Windows, at first I wanted to use pfSense, but I decided to try to do it…

Acquired on December 08, 2022. For a year - the flight is normal, it works like a clock (pah-pah-pah). It doesn't get hot. In terms of signal strength: while it works in a single room of 37 m2, at a rate of 200 Mbps anywhere on any device (5 or 6 Wi-Fi), the speed is 200 Mbps at a frequency of 5 MHz. If you leave the apartment, then moving away 10-11 meters along the common corridor (+ a closed door and 2 (and in fact maybe more) concrete walls, a smartphone (with 5 wi-fi) works at a speed of…

In general, the same router as the Archer C9, which has been discontinued for 3 years already, the results are basically the same, except for the quality of coverage of wifi zones, and the Archer AX73 has practically no coverage drop, the area of ​​​​the apartment is 62m2. Based on the pricing policy of C9 and AX73, AX73 is worth its money, C9 at one time cost several times more. After reading a lot of reviews, I made my personal measurements, the provider provides a speed of 600 Mbit / s, AX73

A very handy device. Sets up quickly, doesn't get hot, and works stably on WiFi 6 without problems. The signal is stable, having overcome the wall in bricks + 20 cm of monolithic concrete + 10 cm of gypsum and at a distance of 15 m, the speed dropped by 15% only, and with D-link there the connection did not work at all .

For this price, the WiFi6 option for a one-story private house is just great. For a house, you need to take more with extra. amplifiers or build a Mesh system.

The routers are very cool both in terms of the level of the WIFi signal, even 5 hertz hits a concrete wall, and in terms of speed and ease of use, but they did not survive in a private house, there is an ouzo in the house. I don't know why the photo is here, but let it be for authenticity.

For the money, it's a great router. Its pros: Stylish design, easy setup. Great phone app, can be controlled remotely. Excellent speed performance in the 5G standard. I turned off the Smart Connect option, since my smartphones did not always connect to the 5G network, even if I was directly at the router. I think it's a software problem. I use OneMesh and it works great. The router does not freeze, there are no problems with it. It is in a private house. Finishes far, the speed drops…

Looks nice. The speed when connecting 4 devices does not sag, the apartment does not allow measuring the coverage area - it covers 40 squares by itself through all the walls, before connecting the tariff, I did a speed test, showed almost 200 megabits, after connecting it gives the declared hundredth.

I still can’t understand what kind of cucumber pancake I need to create a Tp-Link ID account if the router cannot be remotely controlled? Do I have few different accounts? For Asus, for example, this is optional, but you can log in from the local network with a local password, but here you can’t. Stupidity is the worst. Only this infuriates, otherwise an excellent router. (At the rate of 500 Mbps)

I'm trying to get this junk back. In the photo there are traces of air bubbles under the film (not fingerprints), they cannot be erased no matter how hard I try.

I took Asus AX82 and 88 as a replacement. Parental control, QoS, DDOS, IPS do not work in Tp-Link without a subscription. Some pros: Stable WI-Fi connection, good signal. The speed is decent, enough for all services. The settings are simple, there is an application through which you can control some of the functions. With its cons. I didn’t like the fact that the company is trying to make money for everything, therefore, some protective functions of the network are only available in a paid…

Let's go! TPLINK or Mercusys are medium/low cost brands with compatible performance for most products. Often the advertising is exaggerated, it is not a lie, but the advertising is enough to make people believe that they have magical products. In general there is a lot of discontent due to the confusion between One-Mesh and Mesh. One-Mesh is a TP-Link technology compatible with some repeaters in the TP-Link One-Mesh family, it is not the standard Mesh that we find in Deco, Cube Mesh…

I recommend Some pros: Modern router with good functionality (everything you need is there) With its cons: In an apartment building, 2.4 is certainly not the best option (the channel is very crowded and, regardless of the power of the router, there is not enough signal level)

Finally, Wi-Fi began to work on all devices. The old TP Link Archer did not pull 6 servers + equipment. And this does not care at all, dragging a bridge of 4 routers. Tele phones. In general, everything. Didn't regret it at all. As soon as the current turned on everything worked. After some easy setup. And with the old one he always fiddled for 2 hours.