Got pros: Paid Parental control and its absence on the device. It is possible only through the teher application for 500 per month or 5000 per year. Got cons: Lack of 5500 after its purchase. This is my first and last purchase of a router from this manufacturer.

Power. But with a flaw. A little upset by the inability to connect ipv6, the old dir300 set up and worked out of the box, but here it refuses for a cut, we will smoke reasons.

I bought it for growth, I'm waiting for tariffs of more than 100Mbps to appear in our city. In general, this is a device of the near future. Feel free to add 2-3 on such a luxurious router. Pros: + Support for modern technologies (WiFi6, OneMesh). Although the OneMesh apartment is useless, it is enough to put the router in the center. But for country houses it is the most. True, additional repeaters are expensive for the time being. + Stability, set and forget. + Price: I took it for 5k, at a…

My ZyXEL Giga died . which is already 15 years old . The question arose of what to change. I leafed through several reviews, compared it in the market, read reviews - I decided that I should install a model with WiFi6 (ah) standard. At first I chose several options, but they disappeared for various reasons and the choice remained between the Archer AX73, AX50 and Asus models . 50 disappeared, since it is not friends with Rostelecom (the signal is not of that system :))), Asus significantly more

Bought to fully support new wifi 6 devices at home. And it copes with these at 5. The smart connection mode is especially pleasing, when the devices themselves decide which frequency to use: 2.4 or 5. But I ran into a snag in this. All devices at home of different ages and frequencies wound up normally. But the xerox 3020 printer did not want to start up in such a smart network with support for smart chips, he had to create a separate 2.4 GHz guest network without modern options, and then he…

In general, a good option for an apartment with monolithic interior walls - the WI-FI signal goes through without problems. There were some difficulties with registering the device. The only negative point is that the Internet speed drops daily and periodically from 90 Mbps to about 35 Mbps, I got used to overloading the router from the Teather application. Otherwise, there are no complaints.

I sympathize with everyone who bought this raw product . I myself am one of those. Fortunately, most of it was paid with bonuses upon purchase. And when selling, I lost only a part in bonuses, roughly speaking. In, even in the black remained :) You can consider meticulous, but over the past 2 months, 4 routers have passed through me: Xiaomi AC2100, Huawei AX3 Pro Quad core, Archer AX73, Archer AX55 From the main claims to the AX73: 1. Signal quality is frankly weak. Worse than AX73 only…

I feel sorry for everyone who made the mistake of purchasing this raw stuff. I include myself among those people. Thankfully, the majority of it was paid for with bonuses upon purchase of the item. In addition, the process of selling resulted in my losing only a portion of the bonuses. In, even though it remained in the black:) You could say that I am diligent, but in the previous two months, there have been four routers that have gone through me: Xiaomi AC2100, Huawei AX3 Pro Quad core…

This is a good router if you need to update from something that is really old and it costs between 6-7 thousand dollars (for example, from the first revision Archer C20). If there is already an alternative at home that is sufficient, and there are no AX devices, then it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to have another one. Has pros: Another toy from TP-Link that allows you to play around with gigabit LAN (gigabit on Raspberry Pi 4 is especially pleasing, which is still a little NAS, server…

Think for yourself. Better yet, ask an IT specialist you know from work, he will tell you about one brand of network equipment "very difficult to understand." This is not true. Turn on the savvy for 5 minutes or go through the quick guide and you will have happiness, annual uptimes and million percent customization. What are dumps, a guarantee, etc., you will forget at all. The price is basically the same.

There is a video on Youtube where they describe how to connect them, but apparently the author of the video had some kind of Betta firmware that allowed this to be done. I did not experiment with firmware. It's easier to give up and buy a MESH system that is already configured for these tasks. Got pros: Great router, does the job. I considered its work as in a single MECH system, consisting of two similar routers. According to the description, such a scheme is possible. But in fact, I couldn't…

It took me here to turn off the TV's access to the Internet. So that he does not climb there and does not download ates without my knowledge. I searched for settings, no. Hmm, useful to read the network. It turns out you need to download the application. Hmm, ok downloaded, and here is new news, it turns out that in order to block Internet access to a certain device, I have to SEND THEM MONEY and send PERMANENTLY! What? And this is for 10000?! I won't take this rubbish tp link again in my life.

As a router for those who do not want to bother and just want to get a good network with minimal time and money, the router is excellent. Different pros: Set up out of the box in 5 minutes. The signal strength is excellent. On a computer on a wire, the speed does not cut. On wifi, I did not notice the cutting speed either. Cons: A stupid system of subscriptions to incomprehensible services, for me there should not be subscriptions in the router, but everyone has the right not to use them.

Has pros: performance, port speed, easy setup, for a house of 120 sq. M. catches in all corners on 2 floors Its cons: the firmware is still raw, there is a paid subscription inside the application on the smartphone

If you need a functional router, then I do not advise buying this "miracle". With the beeline, it worked with glitches, then upload 100, download 0, then vice versa after a reboot, switching to a new beeline switch helped, they could not agree with the old one. But again, they changed the switch, as they planned to transfer my house to gigabit, in order to issue the promised speeds in their tariffs

With its pros. A good modem for the money with Wi-Fi 6 support, I don’t see any problems in operation yet Cons: Some jambs of firmware that promise to be fixed in the near future and cost an extended HomeShield subscription the price of the modem itself

In general, for its 6-7k, this is a good router if you need to upgrade from something very old (for example, from the first revision Archer C20). If there is already an adequate option at home, and there are no AX devices - well, it doesn’t make much sense. Has pros: Another toy from TP-Link that allows you to play around with gigabit LAN (gigabit on Raspberry Pi 4 is especially pleasing, which is still a little NAS, server, and smart home hub), and AX support, which pleases PS5. For small…

Traditionally, TP-LINK releases a new device with a very buggy raw firmware that makes it impossible to use the device. I understood this well and bought consciously without any illusions. It all worked out that way. In fact, the device is not very functional. 5GHz and 2.4GHz networks cannot work together - after a while, the Wi-Fi speed degrades 10 times (from 500Mbps to 50Mbps) and becomes unstable. Left only 5GHz. The "Security->Access Control->White list" function is also buggy: after…

described above =) Got pros: I have known tp-link for a long time, there were many products from its release. This model also pleases with its performance, speed and signal level. Before that, I used Xiaomi Mi Router R3P Pro. In comparison with it, the signal of the tp-link + is the same, it is enough for two floors in a brick house, but there is no wild speed drop over the wireless network when connecting a large number of devices (15 or more). Xiaomi had this problem. + TP-link is a more…

I bought it to organize a network in an apartment of 90m2 with reinforced concrete floors. Incoming speed over LAN 700Mbps. By WiFi, the speed through the speed test for reception / return in a room with a router is 690 / 630. The worst result in the farthest room through 2 reinforced concrete walls is 290 / 240. I installed an additional mesh repeater from TP-Link and the speed in the back room increased to 450 / 390. Very strong signal, stable performance and high speed. If you need speeds…