Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Aneta Urbaska ᠌ photo
1 Level
148 Review
0 Karma

Review on πŸ“± Unlocked Samsung Galaxy S9 G960U 64GB Smartphone with 4G LTE & 12MP Camera - Midnight Black by Aneta Urbaska ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not a bad product, nothing extraordinary.

In any case, let me just wrap up. A scale from two to three is used. That is, the outcome would have been the same whether the price was 60,000/5 * (2 + 3) / 2 = 30,000 or better less. captured by looking through the lens. The greatest there by far. Nevertheless, in addition to the dialer, I also got a fotik. Except from the need for more volume, the dialer based on the residual principle works perfectly and the signal holds up quite well.

Pros
  • Outstanding blend of attractive traits. There is truth to the rumor that Samsung has mastered the art of producing metal hardware. The gadget has a really ated, trendy camera that can compete with any other phone, and it's aesthetically pleasing and physically (I emphasize the word "physically") ergonomic. As far as my sport is concerned, water protection is not something to be praised, and the screen is no exception.
Cons
  • 1) What is wrong with this Samsung, and why is no one talking about it? Caution: the input keyboard's design is a mess. I had assumed that the budgetary constraints inherent in preparing for the A7 of 2022 were to blame (albeit what a budget for almost 30,000 from the official), but alas, this mega-flagman is just as much of a load of hogwash. That does function to some extent, but if you've ever used an iPhone, HTC, or Huawei, prepare to shatter every finger! See if you can spot the numeral "1" among the other symbols. Contrary to appearances, the firmware dates from 2022. T9 is the "best" in its category since it has more ridiculous replacements and eating areas, it is counter-learning (it will remember mistakes, but won't care about your permanent adjustments), and it will never intentionally arise. Batteries, secondly, are surprisingly sturdy. You have no argument here. This volume seems quite low. New energy-efficient processing technology, I thought. So no . A lot of people have noticed this right away, so I'll just say it: split up! Hardly enough to last a single day. You'll rapidly come to prefer wired chargers because not every charge is consumed, and the native mega-wireless one demands such precise positioning of the phone on it. Third, if energy efficiency doesn't pan out, success could still be had by focusing on performance. But no. Not going to work. We are almost at the very pinnacle of synthetics, but not quite there yet. That is, of course, sufficient for the time being. In other words, this is a model 1 device purchased on the first day it was available to the public. This is, indeed, the ship's most prominent feature. In other words, I'm hoping to secure a profit margin for the next few years. FALSE: Samsung is second only to Intel in the global semiconductor market. Intel, itself, has since surpassed it. Of course, increasing the storage capacity of the phone from 64 to at least 128 gigabytes adds significant cost (+$300-$500 in the open market). Definitely a letdown. Only sixty thousand dollars gets you everything here. Few? A number of seemingly simple things have become industry standards for Mi-Apple-Nocky, but perhaps I'm missing something and am incapable of appreciating Samsung's brilliant concept and "the idiot himself."

Similar reviews