Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
Agata Warda ᠌ photo
1 Level
166 Review
0 Karma

Review on Samsung Galaxy S20 FE G780G 4G Dual 128GB 8GB RAM Factory Unlocked International Version - Cloud Navy (GSM Only) by Agata Warda ᠌

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

Total. The phone is cool. The best deal for its price. But, if you use your phone a lot, read books, play games, then this phone is not for you. Even if you do not notice the PWM, the damage to the eyes is still going on. I hope that at least the white balance will be repaired. Oh yes, I bought a new phone because of the crooked ates that arrived on the old Samsung, not only for me, the screen rotation hung, desktop elements .

Pros
  • All reviews about overheating, brakes and a weak battery apply only to the S20 FE G780F models on the Exynos 990 processor. If you read the specifications and look at the box, you can buy S20 FE G780G for the same price! (indicated on the box) with a SnapDragon 865 processor and you will have a great phone without any problems. Almost without problems) I chose between iPhone 11 and Sams, Sams won. Design 5 points, thin frames, beautiful colors, feels good in the hand, only the camera sticks out and that means you need a case. Camera 5 points, better than on an apple. It blurs the background better, better night mode, better sharpness, further zoom, there is a tracking dual pixel focus, 32 megapixel front camera, everything shoots in 4k 60fps. Stereo sound 4 points, Sams C10 was bass. The microphone is also better than in the background. Good assembly of the phone, I watched the analysis on YouTube. Super fast smooth operation, but there is a major drawback.
Cons
  • The display, everything is fine on the numbers. High resolution / 120 Hz. But then you pick up your old Samsung Note, A50, S10 (all 4 on hand) and even on the budget A50 with the same brightness values, the display is much brighter, the colors are deeper, the white balance is correct and most importantly the eyes do not get tired. In order: 1) PWM i. E. screen flickering on all new samsungs at a maximum backlight of 250Hz, judging by all the tests. The smaller the backlight, the more flickering and the more harmful to vision. The required safe threshold is over 300 hertz. And for the Chinese Xiaomi, Vanplas, this figure is 400-430 on the same screens bought from Samsung. But Google, Samsung and Apple, as usual, saved on quality, which is wildly infuriating. Indeed, in marketing, Yabloko and Samsung are the elite, but in the end . as a result, my eyes get tired, my head hurts, it is known precisely in comparison. You take another phone and your eyes immediately feel better. 2) The white balance is littered with blue. White balance adjustment is only in the "bright colors" mode, there you need to make it as warm as possible, then remove the blue in the palette by half and then it will be correct. In natural color mode, there is no white balance adjustment. This is problem. 3) The brightness of the backlight is underestimated, maybe to save battery in 120 hertz mode. The joke is that 120 Hz is not stable, but dynamic in order to save money, but it’s even good for the battery, but setting 60 Hz you see that the display is sharpened at 120 and the lubrication is unnatural, it’s not convenient to read the letters. Guys from Samsung, well, how is it !? Why Xiaomi, OnePlus, Realmi put your screens and they show them better? Why do budget smartphones put normal display controllers and they are harmless and do not flicker? Why do I buy a flagship with a worse screen than in the budget?

Similar reviews