Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 73
  • 5
    63
  • 4
    6
  • 3
    2
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Expectations were not met, average quality.

The review concerns the FX-8320 Vishera, which operates in the default mode - it replaced the Intel processor (C2D E6770 nominal, although it worked quietly at a frequency of 8X400 MHz) after more than six years of operation. In W7 (all 8 cores are evenly loaded), the time for creating a . zip document archive with the 64-bit version of the 7zip archiver was exactly 2 times reduced - from 410 s to 205 s, which corresponds to the nominal Q8400 quad. I would like the % load, when using one…

Pros
  • Efficient multitasking when combined with an SSD drive; moderate price; the ability to use a multi-socket cooler when the plastic elements that provide fastening to Intel sockets crumble from old age.
Cons
  • if there are not many tasks, then the workload of logical processors is low.

I specially assembled a system for games, I put the mother ASUS SABERTOOTH R2.0 video ASUS GTX 670 to the aforementioned stone. What kind of heating and drop in FPS are the guys talking about who wished to remain anonymous ! ?Complete nonsense! Test, judge for yourself:

Pros
  • price and quality
Cons
  • give the schoolboy

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

Pros: I bought a box, I have a HD 5830 video card / I don’t know what they write about lags, I have BV3 everything flies on any cards. Cons below: the cooler needs to be changed, it makes noise, this is the only drawback.

If the budget allows, it is better to take the intel core i5. If it does not allow, then this processor will work itself out at 100%. Get a good motherboard for overclocking. A cooler even in stock is needed for at least 1500. I have a 550w power supply and gtx650ti, everything worked fine. Different pros: + Excellent video rendering +Good at multithreading + High frequencies in stock, easy to chase +Motherboards are cheaper than intel + Works every penny + In games, Intel is worse almost…

Gorgeous stone! I drove in comparison with the i5 4440 3.1Ghz, but that fit only for photoshop and the price was very depressing. As a result, I settled on this stone, in conjunction with the budget AsRock 970 Extreme 4 and the Zalman 10 Optima cooler, it feels great at a frequency of 4Ghz (set by raising the multiplier). In games, he acutely feels the difference in windows-power settings (works well only in the "high performance" mode ! in other modes, noticeable FPS drawdowns) I advise you,

Pros
  • Power (for your money of course)! , potential for overclocking (the architecture is the same as that of more "older" and more expensive counterparts), performance. The heat spreader is soldered, not hot glue like intel's (no need to "scalp" the stone, with extreme cooling methods).
Cons
  • Alas, not without them -Hot guy (high TPD) 125 watts, but with a good case and CO no problem -From the above, as a consequence, high energy consumption. -Performance per core is inferior to the competitor from intel (in the same price category)

FX 6350, an excellent processor for a home PC, a huge cooler and a Zalman radiator allow you to keep it warm, even under load. Despite the cheap thermal paste (alsil3), it has been working flawlessly for 2-3 years already. I did not overclock, although it is not difficult to do this with him.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

I play a little, I work a lot on a PC - this stone suits me perfectly, reviews praise this stone for working with calculations in software and scold it for not very high performance in games. Initially, I took an old good boxed cooler from DeepCool. Naturally, he could not cope with such a stove as Vishera. I bought a Thermalright Macho 120 Rev. A, smeared DeepCool z5 paste, in the AIDA64 stress test at stock frequencies a maximum of 51 degrees. Vishera - those are still stoves, think over…

Pros
  • Powerful stone. Bought another at a price of 5500. Normal overclocking potential.
Cons
  • 125W, requires good cooling.

This processor is heavyweight and is best suited for multi-threaded applications. In all tests, it is closer to i7. I don’t know what kind of tests they do in laboratories, but in all my tests it’s closest to i7, i5 is almost nowhere near, except for some low-threaded tests. My final verdict is this (you can’t blame for some shortcomings, they are all too different and even designed for different consumers with a wallet) You have to be a performance fan, not a brand. Excellent processor, you…

Pros
  • Multi-threaded, high frequency, feeling of ease of operation after the 965 phenomenon. I have an FX-8350
Cons
  • I need a new Win 8 axis, it shows itself better in it.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is really good, I'm glad I bought it.

Its pros: 4.7GHz runs well at just +0.1, reveals the potential of video cards more strongly. It works well with memory, mine ran with it for 2022, and with Phenom it was a maximum of 1840. Has cons: At the same frequency, it is inferior to Fenom2 x4 in the LinX CPU test

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice product, happy with my purchase and may buy again.

Different pros: - Excellent performance, after Phenom II x4 955 heaven and earth. -Cold stone. With Cooler Master Hyper 101 cooler at idle 35 degrees. Cons below: -Price, thanks to the bonuses and managed to buy at the price of the end of last year, around 8k. - Box cooler. -Outdated architecture, after all, 2022. We are waiting for AM4.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

What you need, a cool purchase, I advise you.

Got pros: Carries all modern popular games paired with 1050TI. What else is needed? Some cons: Reviews about the fact that it is not heated are you serious? It really heats up VERY strongly, with top cooling, although all the programs show an adequate temperature

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great value for money, one of the best offers.

It accelerates to 4.7 GHz when the voltage is raised to 1.5V, but at the same time it begins to combine the role with the heater. Stopped at 4 GHz, without raising the voltage. In fact, it turned out 8350 at a price of 8320

I took 50 to 50 for work (render, video remake, music remake, etc.) and for games (panzar and whatever your heart desires from new products), switched from athlone 630. In the comments, some say that they didn’t feel the difference between them, guys, yes, it’s 2 times more powerful per core, so the system starts, God forbid, if you previously waited 20 seconds to start working, now you can immediately start 2 browsers, let’s say, from 10 and more open windows to him according to FIG. without…

Pros
  • multitasking price (at the time of purchase about 7, previously costs 5 or less) frequency you can drive
Cons
  • for some, the heat dissipation is as much as 125 need a good motherboard need a good cooler

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

Even on the eve of 2023, it loads a video card like the RX590 8 GB at 100%, and without straining (25-30% in the dispatcher). All office tasks, including browsers with dozens of tabs, a movie, a drawing or a model in AutoCad or Compass, will not even be noticed, you can collapse all this and start the game - there will be no difference, if only there was RAM. An excellent option for a budget used assembly, where a more or less modern video card will cost 3-5 or more times more than this…

Pros
  • Fully functional even at the end of 2022, Multithreading. Overclocking capabilities, and quite justified.
Cons
  • Hatred and contempt for him on the forums and in the comments, terrible performance in all kinds of synthetic (not having much value in real conditions) tests. On the performance comparison graphs, somewhere at the level of Pentium or even Celeron of those years, in general, it is always somewhere at the bottom. Bad reputation on sites that specialize in reviews and tests of "computer hardware". In resource-intensive games - simulators or apparently not optimized for such "junk" strong brakes. According to rumors - a strange 2x4 modular architecture in order to be the "first people's eight-core", and therefore really weak in the "single thread".

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good one.

Has pros: Put an SSD drive with it and you will be happy. I have a Western Digital WDC WDS240G. Cons below: Alas, it is becoming obsolete, time is running out and the generation of AMD Ryzen processors is already on the horizon! This is an excellent line of processors!

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not my best purchase, you could have found something else.

Some pros: 6 threads, relatively inexpensive (compared to others), auto overclocking up to 3.8GHZ TPD up to 95W Cons below: I got it with a faulty temperature sensor, at idle 7 ° C in a load of 14-23 ° C, if overheated, it can burn out and take the mother with it modularity of cores (1 module for 2 cores)