Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 29
  • 5
    12
  • 4
    8
  • 3
    4
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I am satisfied, the purchase is quite successful.

I bought it only because of a more powerful zoom and a larger matrix. Never regretted. The quality of photos, even despite the pixel density is very decent. Filmed in the evening at ISO 800. Well, what can I say . Quite worthy. There is practically no noise from the matrix. Compared to the same Lumix TZ30, whose ISO800 is no longer quite working from noise, this is quite a decent result. I don’t know who saw soap and noisy dots in the photos, but personally I can say that the photos are very…

Pros
  • Good zoom. Pretty decent picture quality. Manual flash that does not need to be turned on and off through unnecessary menus and unnecessary movements. Wild power flash. A flash is generally a complete reflection of the proverb "small bug, but stinky." It seems small, but it beats so that it grabs even 15 meters.
Cons
  • Compared to the Panasonic Lumix TZ30, there are few modes and complicated controls. The menu, like all Sony cameras, is confusing. It takes getting used to and learning.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

I will never repeat this purchase.

A disgusting camera. For the money you can buy better. Before each frame, you think about how it will come out: either it will be cloudy, or it will distort objects and people, or it will be with insufficient lighting. After the Canon Power Shot 720IS (I was completely satisfied, it worked for about 7 years, and only the plastic shutter that holds the batteries broke) this camera photographs disgustingly. Look for other options! It is possible that all these photographic defects can be…

Pros
  • nice to hold in your hands and only .
Cons
  • flash solid soap in dynamics even in gold mode distorts the picture in static: the heads are oblong, if the hand comes out to the fore, it turns out to be disproportionately healthy. menu takes a long time to study - very confusing

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

Took for 14 thousand. Its price is quite justified. If someone tells you that for such a price there is better, do not argue. Just buy this one and prove them wrong. I use my entire environment, although they themselves do not have a Model that is quite simple, reliable, easy to use, with flexible manual settings. It will do for a person who already has experience with Sony and Panasonic Lumix cameras (they have a huge number of personal settings, which will be very difficult for a beginner to…

Pros
  • 1. very light compact camera 2. Can take clear artistic photos 3. does not blur images 4. not a bad flash (although it can be more powerful) 5. good video shooting. I’ll even say that it’s much better than video cameras cheaper than 15,000. 6. simply fantastic battery.
Cons
  • 1. Specifically, my display has a little ripples, although I don’t really pay attention to it. 2. Noises are visible in the photo when you zoom in. 3. I haven’t fully figured out some of the settings yet (although I’ve been with it for more than six months)

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Not everything is so bad, but there are disadvantages.

I took it for shooting outdoor activities and amateur sports events - I bought it for a large optical zoom in combination with "long" and fast burst shooting and compactness. Shooting through the preset "sport" scene with a 20x zoom does not work at all - it's dark, it lacks lighting even on the street. If you increase the shutter speed - sharpness disappears on fast moving objects. Photos in "normal" conditions are no different from "soap dishes" costing 3 times cheaper. The total…

Pros
  • Build quality, compact
Cons
  • shooting dynamic scenes - solid SOAP!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I definitely recommend buying, I didn't notice any disadvantages.

Sony lens G and Exmor are perfectly combined, at night you can see the stars in the metropolis. Before that there was Lumix 10 I shot much worse, and the front Nikon 2022-2022 onwards. Sony is a little better with good lighting, with bad lighting it has no equal. At night, you can shoot without a flash (the lightest matrix) Some pros: The matrix is ​​very bright, comfortable to hold in your hand, G lens, 8-meter flash, good auto mode, wide range, zoom, colors. Only 3 buttons can be used for…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

An ideal product for any type of consumer.

I bought this device as an expensive toy and as a toy, this device is beyond praise. The pictures are very worthy (for a toy), if the photo is not very good, then you yourself are doing something wrong. You must understand that this is not a professional camera and do not expect miracles, but pictures that are close in quality to professional ones, this device allows you to take, you just need to be able to . and sweat a little . I am very pleased with the device, despite the price, I still…

Pros
  • Matrix (shoots well in the dark), compactness, Superzoom, USB charging (from the cigarette lighter too), design (nice to take in hand), image quality, battery .
Cons
  • Complex and confusing settings and there are a lot of them (this is for me, because I am too lazy to read the instructions), there are few function buttons, the video button is in the wrong place (touched by the thumb), a rather weak flash.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

Yuzayu 2 days. The device behaves with dignity. At least for me, for a teapot, this is ideal. Was in the theatre. From the last row of the balcony, in complete darkness, the pictures of the actors at 30 magnification turned out to be very high quality, as far as one could expect! The video is also on top, comparable to Handicam's video cameras. Good built-in stereo microphones. And the motor . Well, yes, it makes its way a little when zooming. But it doesn't bother me too much. In general, I…

Pros
  • Of course ZUM! Quality video Good auto mode (IMHO)
Cons
  • I don't know until I found it. Unless very expensive bells and whistles (native case, etc.)

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Bad product, not worth the money.

Bought by a friend, focusing on the EISA solution. In this category of cameras, you can find much better models if you need image quality, and not a huge zoom, the same Canon PowerShot S110 with a 1 / 1.7 "matrix (camera weight 198 g). The Cyber-shot DSC-HX50 has 21.1 mega pixels and Who will take photos for advertising banners with a size of 10 x 10 meters with a portable camera?

Pros
  • 30x zoom (who needs it)
Cons
  • The size of the matrix is ​​1/2.3", the weight of the camera is not for this category of cameras, the issue with the flash has not been resolved.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend.

This is my first camera. The requirements that determined the purchase: compactness, shooting quality (video is required) . and price . of course. Found a stock sale. I bought in installments, the total amount was 11,745. I took several pictures and videos . quite . considering that I am not special in photography. In the future, when I figure out the intricacies of the photo, with aperture, iso, shutter speed, etc., I think the photo will become of better quality. I immediately had the…

Pros
  • Build quality. Compact, quick start, shoots both video and photos well (better), I liked the operation of the flash, it suits it quite well , manual control,
Cons
  • Probably heavy . For good control and shooting, you need to hold it with both hands, outdated equipment . Off. The price is too high.