📷 Black Canon EF-M 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 STM Image Stabilization Lens - International Version (No Warranty) Review

Its pros: with its 320 around" lenses like the Tamron 70-300 at a focal length of 480 it spins very nicely. Its cons: The red price for this albeit optically perfect miracle is 15 It's being sold for 23,000.

I would not attribute its "plasticity" to the shortcomings 18-55 is highly doubtful, very good sharpness, in general,

Cheap on the gray market. It's a good complement to the M body for taking photos in bright light and quiet videos with a telephoto lens. As mentioned, it's made of plastic, but it's compact and lightweight.

I bought a Canon EOS M camera three years ago but my fondness for DRLS made me put it off until today when I got my 55-200 lens it has its Changed my mind and I think this EOS M mirrorless should be my first choice for travel due to its functionality and small size.

This is a great lens to get out and touch a little further. It's clean, sharp, well-designed and, like all other EF-M lenses, allows for consistent focusing both manually and automatically (the auto mode doesn't lock up the mechanism, so you can set it manually). I bought EOS. -M Camera System traveled a few years ago and adapted my Canon EF 70-300mm lens for long distance shooting but it just doesn't fit in my camera bag (LARGE/HEAVY) so the 55-200mm was a welcome addition Pocket. It's only…

Limited to F4.5 at the wide angle, and even with image stabilization you know it's nowhere near a low light lens. Comparing it to larger, more expensive lenses isn't entirely fair as it can't match the image quality of say 70-200L and the L can't match this lens in terms of size and comfort. However, it's sharp enough and works adequately with my EOS M3 camera. If you need a longer lens than a standard lens and don't want to mess with an adapter or a large glass, Canon's mirrorless cameras give

On lack of fish and cancer - a tomato. EF / EF-S optics are large for EF-M mirrorless cameras. And this lens is thin and not very long. Everything else in the merits has already been indicated. Has some pros Pretty sharp across the frame. Moreover, at the maximum open aperture. Thanks to its optical quality, with its 320 eq. Mm it "goes around" lenses like the Tamron 70-300 at a focal length of 480 eq. Mm. Small level of chromatic aberrations. A good stabilizer, winning back up to four stops…

I got tired of constantly poke the adapter from EF50 F1.8 to EF-S 55-250 and I decided to get rid of the latter by buying a telephoto lens for my native mount. In 2022, they are still not there, I ordered them on ibei before the November collapse of the. It came out at about 15tr, taking into account the extortionate exchange rate. I was struck by the fact that the lens turned out to be small. Slightly longer than 18-55 with the same diameter. If we compare with EF-S 55-250, then 55-200 is…

This lens was bought in addition to the standard 15-45 mm lens (its capabilities are not enough for shooting distant objects) and fully justified itself. It does a good job of focusing on distant objects, and if necessary, you can help with the manual focus ring. It also proved to be quite good in shooting moving objects in the "Sports" mode in the camera settings. When focusing on a near object, a beautiful blur of the distant background (so-called bokeh) is formed, which is very good for…