It is significantly sharper than its predecessor at ALL settings, and 2.8 is really effective! I'll compare it to the 70-200 2,8 without the stabilizer of the first iteration, which I shot from 2022; before then, there was still the 100-300, the same "live" juicy. It's a little heavy, especially if you carry it around all day, but this is probably not a disadvantage. I bought a Canon 135 f2.0, which is much smaller and lighter, especially if you have a modern camera with a lot of IHL and you…

If anyone is interested, I can send identical images of the target taken with this; nevertheless, I can't bring myself to state that the 24-70II and the 5D-4 and 5D-3, both in use and in retirement, operate without a hitch. To avoid encountering a repeat situation, run with Canon without looking back. The third version was launched with little changes, and the stub was reduced to 3.5. What does that indicate, in your opinion, and what will I say? A significant flaw in the design that was…

In general, everything is fine, sharp, focus, the price in 2022 is not justified, but guys, be patient, maybe the dollar will fall! Its pros: About them, chasing a lens to grab attention, it is very specific, someone says that there is nothing better than filming various events (weddings, etc.) you have to be 15-20 meters away to shoot a full-length person, it' no matter what anyone says, but it will be removed in 5 it is there and you can see it, Has some cons: This is a huge fool, she is VERY

WORLD and sale made me buy this lens. It's still a lot of money to spend on a piece of glass, but it covers so many areas that it's worth it. One of the reasons I bought the 2.8 and not the 4 was for future considerations, the ability to add a 2x converter + crop body would give 600mm+ @ 5.6 with this lens. The converter is available for less than $500, making it a no-brainer if you don't have the budget to afford the more expensive TVs. Unfortunately there aren't any! I've only had the lens…

Many of the reviews here repeat the obvious: it's a popular focal length, it's heavy, it's expensive, and it's sharp. We all know that, right? You can go to Flickr, search for a lens and see tons of examples with a specific lens. I will talk about my experiences with him. I had a non-IS f/2.8 and had to sell it. I like to shoot indoors with shutter speeds slower than 1/100s. The non-IS f/2.8 version was a very sharp lens, but I get sharp shots when using a shutter speed of 1/80s and slower. My…

This is my Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II USM review. The purpose of this legendary lens is to provide a mid-telephoto focal length for a variety of photographic purposes. This lens can be used for a wide variety of photography: weddings, portraits, wildlife, street photography and, my favorite, sports. I'll start with some of the technical aspects of this lens because it deserves such respect. The focal length of the Canon EF 70-200mm F/2.8L IS II USM is an improvement over a standard zoom…