Everything has already been written about him. For such a device, simple optics is a waste of money. Only L's! Even 85 1.8 is rather weak for him. That is, of course, if you want to see what he is capable of. And about the video. I never thought that I would use it :) . But I tried it and now I often indulge in it (just don’t tell anyone, otherwise it’s not solid like that :)) But his video is on top.

I strongly suggest that you read through the instructions, particularly if you are the owner of one of the first Piglets. There have been some intriguing features introduced, such as grids while using Live View, priority in highlights (the best study in highlights is a form of boost in Dynamic Range), and Live View itself. Got pros: Even though the first one is extremely nice, the introduction of a great camera represents a significant step forward in the industry. It is definitely possible to…

This is a wonderful camera, and to this day a worthy representative of full-frame cameras. It makes sense to buy if there is no money for a more expensive solution with a full frame, since the year the model was released was still 2022 and in December 2022 the model was discontinued. Pros below: I put all the high marks, because the device is excellent for the time of release (2022) and remained the best until the release of 5DM3. - full frame - magnesium case - good video, this device has…

For my needs, that's it! It remains to buy a couple more lenses over time, and I will have complete photographic happiness ! Has some pros Finally bought! I tried it on vacation with a 35 mm gorgeous lens - it was enough for my eyes! I shot them in the gardens (+ 70-200 / 2.8) and realized the beauty of the full frame - you can’t practically do without a flash on a crop, but here it’s just a nice thing ! I took the only camera, without comparison - the focus fell on 2 lenses, stupid ones…

Got pros: - Image quality still outperforms crops - Pretty solid solid body - Good value for money in 2022 Has cons: - Not very tenacious and fast autofocus - In terms of sensor sensitivity, it loses to modern full-frame cameras - Out of production

In general, I can say that any camera is just a tool in the hands of a photographer. If you expect that by buying it you will automatically start getting masterpieces and it will change your life, you are going the wrong way. It all depends on the skill and hands of the photographer. No need to blame the jambs and shortcomings of your photos on cameras. Look at books on the history of photography, go to museums, search the net and see how good technical quality people achieved 100 years ago…

I did not shoot the video, because. there is no need for this. I shoot exclusively in RAW (otherwise I don’t see the point in buying such a camera). I fully share the thesis that it is not the camera that shoots, but the photographer. I took more than 10 thousand pictures with this camera, of which about 5-10% (depending on the shooting conditions) were not in focus. Possibly crooked hands. I advise you to pay attention to the limited use of slow shutter speeds when shooting handheld (from 1/80

Great device. Switching to it from 50d took no more than 10 seconds. Very demanding on optics. Therefore, now I use only L glass. Even gave 50 1.4 to a friend

a decent camera, they took it for 113 thousand before the new year, flew around the Earth with it, the mileage is a little less than 6 thousand, excellent quality, feelings, video - very decent the difference in quality with 5D is noticeable, if possible - take it, for such quality - you don’t feel sorry for the money, although there were many doubts about the price

I definitely liked the camera more in color than the Nikon d7000, and in general it is more pleasant both in the hand and in control. Although AF is lame (see shortcomings), it is of little use for shooting moving objects (it will simply not focus if the object is not in the center of the frame). For me personally, point number 1 in the merits covers all the shortcomings, because in the end people look at the photo, and not at what camera it was taken or what kind of autofocus it had. And the…

Full frame, in principle, is probably a virtue. Just do not put this full frame at the forefront, idealizing millimeters is stupid. Although the result - the resulting photographs - is admired for its quality. The main thing is to make the photo itself without marriage, with such a technique it’s still a science :) PS. Finally, I would like to draw attention to: Using this camera without an intermediary software is very stupid. Didzhik in jpege will gobble up all the beauty to the level of…

It broke down on the 3rd day, the frames light up, and no matter what you shoot, it always registers the first frame taken in memory. So I turned it on, took a picture, and then it doesn’t matter what you shoot, it just duplicates the first one and that’s it. They sent it in for repair, it worked for 3 days, then everything returned again. They gave it back, after that it also began to freeze, and in order to bring it back to life, it was necessary to get the battery. Canon refuses to reject…

I can’t say that I chose it from several, but I was thinking about the third nickel, and about 6d. Comparing the picture of mark 2 and mark 3, according to dd and noise, I took mark 2. Since this is the same thing. 6d dropped immediately. For a full-frame camera, a cut-down shutter speed is nonsense. 1/8000 is a necessary standard and is sometimes needed. Plus, the ergonomics of 6d are not good at all. Removed the buttons next to the LCD screen.

I advise you to look through the manual - especially to the owners of the first Piglets - interesting features have been added, such as priority in highlights (the best study in highlights is a kind of increase in Dynamic Range), grids when using Live View, and of Live View itself)) Got pros: A wonderful camera, compared to the first heel, is a breakthrough, although the first one is very good. It is quite possible to work up to iso 6400 (subjectively) - the noise has taken on a completely…

Let me tell you right now, I am not a photographer. I don't have that creative flair. But I know a lot about photography and about technology, too, not by hearsay. The first DSLR was 450 d, it infected me with photography since then I dreamed of something more. Buying the first fix 50 1.8 then the first elka and so on increasing As a result, I can say that I was the owner of most of the lenses of the company, and the most expensive ones. But I didn't get better at it. As a result, I settled…

Different pros: Well, a wonderful camera-detailing, elaboration of details, low noise (it's still a PHOTO camera!) very satisfied!) Got cons: It would be more accurate with the white balance and especially with the color reproduction of red shades (perhaps this is subjective - I use the Samsung PH 100 CRT monitor)

After 40D, it's nice to understand that you are shooting at full frame; like on film. If the 40D did not quite reach the 35mm film frame in terms of picture quality, then the Mark 2 surpasses the film. Fully reveals itself only with fixes, starting from 50 1.8. Zooms simply lack resolution, especially at the edges of the frame. It is advisable to buy a battery pen, because. consumes a lot of energy. All film lenses (EF) on Mark begin to work as they were designed during their development. On…

Of course, the difference in image quality compared to 50K is striking, especially under adverse conditions 5K is beyond praise. To be honest, there are almost no focus misses, why they write a lot about this in the reviews, I can’t say. It’s just that sometimes shooting conditions require a switch to manual focus, automation is sometimes powerless .

If you shoot with this camera in good light, daylight, studio, the quality of the pictures will be high. But if the lighting is complex, for example, twilight, when pulling shadows from RAV, noise already climbs to ISO 200-400! If you shoot at ISO 800, 1600 and higher, there seems to be no noise, but traces of intra-chamber noise reduction are visible to the naked eye, and hence the drop in detail and blurring of the picture. White balance often lies even with manual installation, I generally

Much has been written about the characteristics, but photography is not only dry numbers, is it? So I will share my feelings. For several years I used an extremely good "crop" (50D), tried different lenses and began to grow a little with L-optics. At some point, I began to realize that a more decent carcass was missing. On a budget, the choice was clear. Took - happy as an elephant.