Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 81
  • 5
    59
  • 4
    14
  • 3
    7
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I do not cease to rejoice at the purchase, a very good deal!

Legendary camera. A workhorse in the truest sense of the word. The picture quality is excellent, ie. the result is 99% dependent on you, and not on the camera, because it can, if not everything, then almost everything. Autofocus is certainly not like in units, but in most cases it is also enough. Handling is convenient. Reliable, withstood the test of "stressful situations", was in a forced repair (dog bite) and yet continues to work perfectly.

Pros
  • Picture quality
Cons
  • Autofocus could be better

Having purchased this camera about three years ago, I have never regretted it. The new Mark 3 has a better autofocus system, which is important for reporting, and a higher burst speed. These are important benefits. However, comparing these devices in practice, I won’t say that I’m going to the store for a new one. Most depends on the camera operator. Optics is not a small part of the component. And appropriate care - setting up cameras, lenses, strong hands and a bright view of the world around

Pros
  • Today price, full frame, colors, build quality, display. Excellent Raw, stretches well, good light sensitivity, color shades, high-quality display, focus adjustment for lenses, a huge fleet of manufacturer's optics and through other adapters.
Cons
  • Focusing system, burst speed, camera jpeg, medium quality white balance.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Mediocre product, probably won't use.

I have a whole epic connected with the purchase of this device, it was not my destiny to contact him initially. I went to the dream 5D mark 2 from 350D, 400D, 20D, 40D, 5D, and finally it . I buy it in one store, test it at home and see that the focus just inexplicably walks with all my lenses, while on old 5D in the same conditions, it works perfectly. I returned the device to the store and received the money back, then I tried to buy the device remotely through an ad on the Internet on the…

Pros
  • Comfortable in the hand, good quality video, wide dynamic range, little noise.
Cons
  • It just infuriates the manufacturer's swine attitude towards 5D mark2, the focus walks wherever it wants, regardless of the class of optics. 21 megapixels, in my opinion, is also a disadvantage, because there is a second device, the old 5D, and I see that even at 24-70 2.8L, the mark gives half as sharp a picture with all equal settings. Yes, and the weight of files with our volumes is 40 Gb of material from each wedding, although people print photos of a maximum of 20 by 30. For me, it would be better if they made the physical size of the pixel larger, it would be better sharpness, dd, less noise . And another minus - the manufacturer deliberately does not support 60 frames per second video, which is even on the 550D, forcing us to buy a second device, and a crop, if we are professionally engaged in DSLR video.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

Spend more time with it, experiment with shooting modes, at least study the instructions. ps: autofocus in tracking focus mode and burst shooting is more than enough to capture movement, even a photo session of a playful and maneuverable seagull in Tsaritsino can be shot without misses freely )) the picture is juicy even without processing. Its pros: An ideal camera! It doesn’t creak or squeak anywhere, it doesn’t mow, it doesn’t need adjustment in the service, there is a personal ideal setting

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Best thing I have ever used, highly recommended!

How I shot them at 50D before - I’ll never know :) The full-size matrix changes the feeling of the photo by 100%. The picture is more plastic and deep. Yesterday I filmed a wedding - and I'm still trudging. Of course, the 16-bit tiff from it is incredibly huge. Still, you have to take the first five for easier work. I don’t want to return to the crop :). In 2022, after all, it is expensive compared to the United States.

Pros
  • Full frame - high-aperture optics "sketched". fifty dollars 1.4 and 70-200 finally appeared in full glory. Good battery. Holds a charge. Megapixel. When printing, noise and "indistinct" sharpness go away
Cons
  • too small. You still have to take the handle. Megapixel. Huge equals. The screw is clogged at once.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

The best full-frame camera available! Excellent elaboration of details and shadows, any even inexpensive lens draws beautifully, there is practically no noise! 7D! Some pros: Full frame - full disclosure of all the possibilities of optics, there is no noise with sufficient lighting and 4000 ISO, video, life view, lens adjustment, back-front focus, dust and moisture protection, unified control and a battery with 7D (I have both cameras - very convenient) Some cons: A few focus points and…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I like the product, the quality didn't let me down.

With the release of 5dm3, the second mark has not lost its relevance and can be on par with 3m in terms of picture quality. Of course, he will yield to him in terms of convenience, AF, ISO, etc. They even removed the shutter lag. But from the pictures from it, one cannot say that this is something fundamentally new. With its pros. Pretty comfortable despite the brick shape. It is easy to keep turning the wheels without fear that it will slip out. If you get used to it, everything is exposed…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

I purchased an EOS 50D in July 2022 for the purpose of beginning the process of transitioning to digital photography. At the time, I was fully aware that the masterpiece does not lie in the camera itself, but rather in the hands that need to be taught how to shoot. Because there was still some money left over, an EF 70-200 f/2.8 ISM ii was purchased instead. Optics is completely devoid of educational opportunities. You must have it.) Inside the recesses of my thoughts was the thought that I…

Pros
  • Everyone is aware of it!
Cons
  • There will never be a day when one of these companies produces the perfect camera. What happens after that? I went out and got one, so how about some joy on the house?

Revainrating 4 out of 5

A good product at a good price, I advise you to try it.

I treat the device with respect - for its time it was just a Cannon! I owned it from 2022 to the beginning of 2022. I realized that it couldn’t continue like this. Big, heavy, hemorrhagic with SF cards, etc. I bought a Sony A7 for almost the same amount that I sold mark2. Glad-satisfied. I am writing this review for those who are thinking of buying something full-frame. This one is not worth buying. If Canon is fundamental, then add a little and take the 6D of the first version. It's smaller…

Pros
  • I am writing this review with an eye to the fact that it is 2022. The device is cool, but its time has passed. 1. inexpensive full frame 2. the ability to shoot high-quality video 3. a sea of ​​​​different optics from the cool L-series to cheap, but good scoop glasses 4. reliable and indestructible constructive and excellent assembly 5. clear and convenient menu 6. in-camera focus adjustment of each lens separately
Cons
  • for 2022: 1. weak autofocus 2. ancient CF memory cards - dancing with card readers, etc. 3. any view only up to 30 frames per second - forget about the beautiful slowdown 4. no wi-fi / GPS 5. working ISO up to 3200 6. shadows do not stretch well. Dynamic range is generally bad for 2022

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Good value for money, I recommend it.

The arrival of the 5dm3 has not rendered the 2nd mark obsolete; in fact, it is capable of producing images with the same level of quality as the 3m. In terms of practicality, aperture priority, and so on, he will, of course, defer to him. Even the shutter latency has been eliminated. On the other hand, one cannot conclude that this is something genuinely new based on the photographs that it contains. despite some drawbacks. Despite its brick-like form, this chair offers a decent amount of…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A very high-quality product, I take it not for the first time.

I switched to it after the seeds . I will say this, the device is not bad in terms of pictures (higher ISO and dd) But the rest is worse . The most disgusting thing about this device is autofocus. Slow and not accurate. The central point is even more or less . shooting in dynamics is simply unbearable. When you set auto ISO, automatics prioritize ISO. At shutter speed 1.30, it sets ISO 200, for example, but not to raise ISO by 1600 and shorten shutter speed. but this is so simple a remark. In…

Pros
  • -High working ISO - Capacious battery -Convenient control - Stretchy Rav compared to crops - Lens autofocus adjustment - Dust and moisture protected
Cons
  • -Autofocus -auto iso - the shutter slams like a clapperboard

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A high-quality product, the price corresponds to the quality.

I want to be clear right from the bat that I am not a photographer. I simply do not possess that kind of creative flair. But my knowledge of photography and technology is not secondhand; I have firsthand experience in both fields. My very first digital single-lens reflex camera was a 450 d, and ever since then, I've wanted to upgrade to a better model. Purchasing the initial FIX 50 1.8, followed by the initial ELKA, and so on, with rising values As a consequence of this, I am able to declare…

Pros
  • camera has some merit)
Cons
  • I cannot even begin to guess. In comparison to 450 d, the noises do not bother me nearly as much, and I do not have any issues with the memory card cover. The sole decline in price and cost occurs with the release of mark 3, however this is a natural process that occurs over time.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Wonderful quality, one hundred percent satisfied!

Having a Nikon D300s, I took the subject for a couple of months to indulge and work, to see what FF is. The picture is amazing! I used it with 50mm 1.2, 70-200 2.8 II and 24-105 4. Real problems arose with focus only on the TV, but no more than 5 frames out of 100. You can’t shoot sports, dynamic scenes too, but this is not what the camera was created for! She will justify her purchase even now, especially considering the prices. I was delighted, I really did not want to return the device :)

Pros
  • Picture. A wonderful matrix for dd and colors.
Cons
  • Focus. Today, when there is a mark 3 and 1dx with its 61 points, we will say: horror, how can you use it. But in fact, there are no special problems with the central sensor. Yes, it’s inconvenient, but people use it and take great pictures!

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well made the product is, just magical!

Some pros: no words . excellent model. large matrix. color depth. high sensitivity, speed 1/8000, even video. Different cons: not a rotary LCD display. There is no image stabilization in the characteristics, I don’t know if there is one in the device.

the model is good, more precisely at the time of release, just great! The video shoots perfectly in bright conditions, in dark conditions it leaves much to be desired - it makes a lot of noise! the photos are excellent - there is no noise up to 1000 ISO, the most important feature of this camera is its resistance to dust, I really like it! a decent camera in the arsenal of the average photographer! I advise everyone

Pros
  • full frame, comfortable, pleasant, functionally thought out, video is not bad, pictures are excellent, works great with flash, easy to clean, lens alignment is excellent
Cons
  • lazy (not a quick shot), under difficult conditions sometimes likes to think about how to focus

Revainrating 4 out of 5

It is of good quality, but I won't buy it again.

It is very strange that such a serious camera has such jambs with BB. I worked with Canon 30D for several years - there were no such problems with BB Has pros: Gritty. Fits well even in small hands Low noise at high ISO (up to 2022) Pretty tenacious focus The rate of fire will suit anyone, unless he is a paparazzi or a sports photographer Has some cons Seriously lies in the white balance at a color temperature below 3500 K. The presence of an external flash does not help. Takes all shades to

My previous cameras were a film Zenith and two Canon digital SLRs, the 300D and the 30D. I am fairly new to the world of photography. It just so happened that I traveled to the same city at the same period for a number of consecutive years in a succession (Shanghai, September-November). A year ago, it was considered hip to wear a Nikon around one's neck; but, these days, posters featuring Jackie Chan, who promotes the "five" from Canon, can be found just about anywhere. Now Canon is cool there,

Pros
  • For the course of his five-month business trip, he did not once recall the necessity of conducting an outbreak. Even handheld nighttime photographs taken from the ship come out remarkably clear and sharp. The viewing angles have grown much more expansive. You can take pictures with a regular "fifty kopeck" lens just like you would with a wide-angle lens. The sensations are out of this world, but you're going to need some nice glasses. My go-to "automatic" is the 50L/1.2, which isn't cheap but offers a wide range of customization options and is of exceptionally excellent quality.
Cons
  • Heavy for travel. The racist policy of the company (absolutely serviceable matrices are sold only on the local market, but we are sold culling) . It's true that this is something that each and every Japanese company that makes photographic equipment does.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am delighted, the product is really worthy.

As a result, if we consider it only as a fotik, then the model is strong. Makes all competitors released cameras on the same days. And all these fables about noise, HA, ISO pitch, pixels, and the size of the latter on the matrix are nonsense. And when the RO in the editor is about the same for everyone in terms of capabilities. And, for example, Nikon with its photos weighing 70 mb, against mark 2 with a weight of 25 mb, even loses in terms of shadow and light reserves. In other words, with the

Pros
  • The quality of everything in the photo.
Cons
  • Ergonomics not at 5. Video autofocus is missing. Although the video writes well. Of course, if you sharpen it very much, and install another firmware + focus manually, for each take. That final video can be achieved like Hollywood. A similar real video camera with the same picture capabilities will cost from 40,000 USD. There is no rotary display. It's a pity. For example, in the crowd at a concert, you raised him on your heads to shoot the stage and bummer. The screen is not visible.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

In July 2022, I bought an EOS 50D for the initial development of digital photography with the full understanding that the masterpiece lies not in the camera, but in the hands that need to be taught to shoot. Therefore, the EF 70-200 f2.8 ISM ii was bought with the remaining money. There is nothing to learn in optics. You must have it.) My desire to buy this unit lurked somewhere in the depths of my mind. Which, in fact, restrained from buying, making it clear that 85,000 for a matrix + video…

Pros
  • Everyone knows!
Cons
  • None of the manufacturers will ever have an ideal camera. And then what? I bought one and here's happiness for you?