Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
πŸ”’ enhanced ford door n808689-s417 lock actuator: 10 peel-type rivets for easy compatibility logo

πŸ”’ Enhanced Ford Door N808689-S417 Lock Actuator: 10 Peel-Type Rivets for Easy Compatibility Review

3

Β·

Average

Revainrating 3.5 out of 5Β Β 
RatingΒ 
3.5
βš™οΈ Motors, πŸ› οΈ Replacement Parts

View on AmazonView on Π―M

Media

(2)
img 1 attached to πŸ”’ Enhanced Ford Door N808689-S417 Lock Actuator: 10 Peel-Type Rivets for Easy Compatibility
img 2 attached to πŸ”’ Enhanced Ford Door N808689-S417 Lock Actuator: 10 Peel-Type Rivets for Easy Compatibility

Description of πŸ”’ Enhanced Ford Door N808689-S417 Lock Actuator: 10 Peel-Type Rivets for Easy Compatibility

.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    1
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 2 out of 5

Junk Rivets Ruined My Repair!

Automotive enthusiasts, save your money and steer clear of these cheap, low-quality rivets. My analysis of this product showed that they were poorly constructed and failed to hold up during installation, leading to a botched repair job. Despite their low price, these rivets are not worth the headache and hassle they cause.

Pros
  • Affordable
Cons
  • Poor quality, difficult to install

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Looks like an OEM Ford rivet

I bought these because the lock motor had come loose because the rivet holding it broke after 16 years. Note: they will not fit in a standard rivet gun, they are very large. I messed up my new rivet gun trying to get it to work. I ended up with a bolt and nut. The rivets are very strong and durable.

Pros
  • Excellent overall performance
Cons
  • Doubtful

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect tool for the job

I checked online. I was worried about finding something perfect. This made it easy to tell they were for a Ford, although my Ford wasn't on the list they were a perfect fit. For reference I put them on my 1999 expedition. You will need a large rivet gun, I bought a Dorman 743-100 that will do the job.

Pros
  • Consistent test results
Cons
  • Could have chosen a newer model