Pros
- The design, the long life of the battery, the ergonomics, the ability to find phone functions, and the speaker.
Cons
- Could not find
Pros
- A brief assessment from someone who has recently upgraded from the Samsung Gear Sport and was previously using the Gear S2: There are fewer positive points than there were before: Finally, I was able to stop continually checking on the battery's status; now you may go to sleep without any concerns. The design of the watch is both aesthetically pleasing and quite comfortable to wear. They have a nice appearance even when worn on a slim hand, they sit securely, and there is even a reserve on the strap. The weight of titanium is minimal, while sapphire is resistant to abrasion (unfortunately, I already checked it once, there are no scratches) Regular wireless charging, which, unlike Samsung, can be done with any Qi charger. I tried charging the P30 Pro in the opposite direction, and it was successful. It's true that there are holes in the native cover, but they're rather little. around one percent will be charged per minute. Monitoring shows that pulse and sleep are both normal, and the graphs are legible. As compared with a finger pulse oximeter, the SpO2 somewhat overestimates the value. Because charging is so condensed, even careful people can misplace it. And finally, you just need to bring one outlet and wire for your phone and watch when you go on excursions. Pricing - the prices that other companies charge for titanium and ceramics might vary by three to four times. I use Samsung as a reference point, but apple is impossible for me to accept.
Cons
- Sorry, but this is negative. The majority of the issues involve software in which there is a simple repair. When you are in possession of an unlocked phone and a notification is sent to it, that notification will also be sent to the clock. Why?! I've already got my eyes on the screen; there's no need to shake now. This is not possible on the sm server. Everyone has written about the fact that the clock does not display the icons of all applications. There are no instantaneous interactions with alerts (like "Mark as read"). Yes, if we're talking about sm. There is no feedback available from the notifications on the phone; if you swiped the notice on the clock, you will need to swipe it again on the phone. On sm - looks in all possible places. You received a notification, but you chose not to look at it or raise your hand when you were supposed to do so, right? Until you check it for yourself, you will be unaware that it is dangling from your possession. There will be no hints whatsoever. There was likewise no indicator on SM until the year 2022, but they went ahead and put it anyhow. I am aware that it was not the watch's initial purpose to support the installation of software from a third party; but, is there any way that I can make it so that I do not require this feature? To start, I'll set a calendar in front of you. On sm, I made frequent use of the calendar because it was so convenient there; however, that functionality does not exist here in any way, and I foolishly did not anticipate that it would. And I am unable to install because the addition of four games to the app store is a far higher priority than the development of a calendar or a calculator. When I turn on AOD, the screen turns off when I activate it by raising my hand, which puzzles me because I'm delighted that it is and the dials are functioning normally. Why should I give in to anything? When it comes to the weather, the Samsung has a feature where you can observe the current conditions by swiping the main screen to the right. When you click on this screen, you will get the hourly weather as well as a forecast for the next week. When using the gt2 pro, you can check the current weather by swiping the screen to the right. You press, but nothing happens in response. You need to navigate to the menu, scroll through it, and then you will see everything that is available. This is how you can view the weather forecast. Function on the bottom button - around half of the functions do not require quick access from the button because they may be accessed by swiping from the main screen. That cannot be the case. Unreasonably inconvenient menu, in which only three lines at a time are shown on the screen. If you click anywhere else than the primary button, the system will malfunction every other time.
Pros
- This is a wonderful tracker for your fitness.
Cons
- This fitness tracker comes with a hefty price tag.
Pros
- 1 titanium case 2 sapphire glass three wireless charging options 4 Please keep me for seven to ten days 5 You seem fine, but not fantastic 6 price
Cons
- (1) There are no displays that are easy to read and contain the information that I require; (2) It is not possible to display the clock alone while the screensaver is active. 3 touch display, yet the device does not wake up when you touch it; 4 When recording a route, the primary display (time and rest) should not be shown; 5 altimeter does not operate; The watch is significantly less expensive due to the presence of six sketched dangers along the display's perimeter; 7 you will not be able to add the display stopwatch and timer to your favorites. Just on the bottom button, and only one item; only on the bottom button. 8 incorrectly counts steps; to compensate, I waved my hand while still being stationary and added 100 steps)) 9 causes a dispute between the iPhone and AirPods when chatting; 10 does not automatically display the weather.
Pros
- After the first GT, more of a preference was shown for design, style, and fashionable youth. Charging wirelessly from any Qi charger, not just from the one you own Monitoring of saturation and stress Interaction with the phone is more reliable and suffers fewer instances of connection loss.
Cons
- - The heart rate monitor functions less well, and the evaluations have already covered everything that needs to be said about the inertial measurement. I don't care much, I have endurance cardio. On the other hand, this will be essential for a different kind of training. I went to the rhythm, and the pulse on the clock increased in stages of 100-120-140, etc., with an interval of 5-10 seconds in between each step. - When compared to the earlier iterations, the training mode functions less effectively, there are an increased number of failures in monitoring, and when tracking is enabled, an unacceptable number of pits are displayed. - a shorter life for the battery. As a result of the fact that I adjusted the time on my watch a while ago, I am completely certain of this. In my operating mode, the average amount of charge consumed in the first few hours is 8% of the total day usage. (This includes sleep, the activities of a typical day, and three hours of training with GPS tracking.) During these hours, the average consumption is 13% more than normal, which is almost twice as much. Hence, the number of days between charges is eight, not twelve. It was adjusted such that it would save the most amount of energy possible. I do not make use of any new chips, such as those that allow one to "listen to music from the clock on the blue tooth." The impression that these are overly sensitive to the movement of the hand and frequently "switch on" the screen is one that can only be formed by the individual. - I would be interested in using NFC payment, but unfortunately, neither this device nor the older ones have it. It's too bad, because it's helpful.
Pros
- Quartz glass, titanium case, battery
Cons
- The watch is absolutely not suitable for sports.
Pros
- Quality workmanship, user-friendly interface. Titanium case, sapphire crystal.
Cons
- Haven't found it yet.
Pros
- After the first GT liked more design, stylish fashionable youth. Wireless charging from any Qi-charger, not only from your own Measurement of saturation and stress Interaction with the phone works more stable, loses connection less
Cons
- - The heart rate monitor works worse, about the inertial measurement has already been written in the reviews. I don't care much, I have endurance cardio. But for a different type of training it will be important. It looks like this - I went to the rhythm, and the pulse on the clock grows in steps of 100-120-140, etc. with an interval of 5-10 seconds. - The training mode works worse than in the first ones, there are more failures in monitoring, when you turn on tracking, some unreasonable pits are visible. - Less battery life. In view of the fact that I changed my watch one day, I have absolute confidence in this. The average charge consumption in the first hours in my operating mode is 8% per day. (This is sleep + daily activity + 3 hours of training with GPS tracking). On these hours, the consumption is almost twice as much - 13% per day. Thus, from charge to charge 8 days, not 12. All energy saving settings were turned to maximum savings. I don’t use any new chips like “listen to music from the clock on the blue tooth”. There is a subjective feeling that these are hypersensitive to the turn of the hand and more often "turn on" the screen. - NFC payment, I would like, but it is not here or in the old ones. Too bad, it's useful.
Pros
- Design, quality materials. Sound. Battery capacity. Waterproof. Applications.
Cons
- Not
Pros
- Good design, you can change screensavers, which are a decent amount. Quite a long battery life without recharging, the ability to recharge using a wireless charger. The pulse counts quite accurately, and there are enough functions, at least optimally for me.
Cons
- 1. After 2 weeks of use in the simple wearing mode, they stopped responding to turning on the screen when raising the arm (to see the time, for example), although in the training mode (when the training mode is on), everything is displayed correctly, and when the arm is lowered, the screen goes out after a few seconds . In the "Health" application, the "turn on the screen when raising your hand" checkbox is on. I rebooted both the phone and the clock, nothing helped. I turned on the checkbox in the program, rebooted, turned it off, rebooted both the clock and the phone - the result is zero. As a result, I simply turned on the constant display of time on the screen, tk. if this is not done, then the time can be viewed only by pressing one of the buttons on the clock. 2. When training, for example, on an ellipse, it incorrectly displays the number of steps per minute, and if you hold on to the handles of the simulator while walking, at 130-135 steps per minute, the clock shows either 120 or 98 (this is if you remove your hand from the handle and immediately look). As soon as the hand on which the watch is not holding the handle of the simulator, the number of steps per minute first starts to jump up and down, and then starts to grow and approaches the value indicated on the simulator (with an error of 2-4 steps). I believe that the calculation of calories burned is also related to the number of steps per minute, so the calorie counting lagging behind the "training" one is quite significant at heart rate up to 130 (on the simulator 500, at 100-120 hours), but begins to "catch up" at a pulse of 150-160 . With an average load on the ellipse of 200-205W and an average heart rate of 150-153, for 1350W on the simulator, the watch shows 850-860 calories. 3. When the headphones are working during training (a bunch of phone - wireless headphones), music playback on the watch may accidentally turn on (perhaps it was touched with a wet towel when wiping, and the music started working). As a result, music from one player in the phone plays in the headphones, and another one plays from the clock, possibly from music, and in the headphones I could not hear that the clock was yelling at the floor of the hall.
