Interactive educational toy Giraffes Game center Multicube, 939400, multi-colored Review

The kid appears to enjoy the item. The phone is taken away, and in its place are tunes, a maze, some whirling gears, and some figures. For the betterment of the youngster.

Good toy, the child is happy. The phone is removed, melodies are played, a small maze, gears are spinning and a selection of figures. All for child development.

Different pros: All sides of the cube are understandable to the child, he really likes the phone and the mirror, he constantly looks into it Its cons: The side with the sorter could be made one, the holes for the sorter do not match in colors, the child does not understand why the yellow part needs to be put into the blue hole

My child has been playing with relatives with such a cube since three months, and therefore I decided to buy a mirror for us, our love, we twist, we move, we are still small for the sorter, but in the future there will also be some pluses, not loud but not quiet either. I am very pleased with the purchase, it's a sticker and not a cube

As we bought this cube, not only a 10-month-old baby began to play in it, but also a 4-year-old daughter, sometimes fighting for it. The cube is unkillable, they threw it and hit it on the floor, it doesn’t matter to him, the stiffening ribs save, plus everything is done in good faith. The games are all interesting, especially phones and pianos (we dance to it with the whole family). Take it, you won't regret it, I don't regret it!

I don't understand why everyone is crazy about him. Led by the reviews - bought. There is not a single light bulb on the cube, and the child loves everything flashing . He was upset. The sound quality is terrible, like on toys in the 90s. We live in a modern world, is it really impossible to insert one normal speaker for a $ 30 toy so that the melodies sound beautifully? And so the feeling that in the hands of a balalaika for $ 0.99 from China.

In general, the cube is not bad, but the main drawback is the sorter, apparently a lot of Chinese worked on it to make everything as incomprehensible as possible. The audience for which it is designed, the figures should be the simplest, the colors should match, in this instance The colors of the figures do not match, there are similar figures, the triangle, in my opinion, should have been made also equilateral (it is isosceles), as a result, the two sides of this cube are useless. Of course…