Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 185/65 R15 88H summer Review

I really liked this tire from a well-known Korean manufacturer, the excellent price is more attractive than that of Japanese brands, but quite comparable in quality! No noise, works great in rainy weather. I am satisfied with the purchase and recommend this manufacturer, which I have known by the way for more than 10 years!

In general, the rubber is a confident average. Not particularly noisy, the roll is good, the puddles pass nicely, it doesn’t react to the rut (before that there was a matador, so it was dragged back and forth with the same parameters) I won’t say yet about wear and durability. I drove it for about 5tkm

I read reviews, some write soft and quiet, others hard and noisy. Maybe I drove a little more, but it makes a lot of noise. And with some irregularities, blows as if it were made of wood. Stood on Solaris from the cabin. I don’t seem to be pumping (2.2 atm). Maybe it'll be better when it's done.

traveled 40,000 km. 3-4mm more tread. very confidently storm water barriers on these tires. keeps the road at high speed. in heavy rain you can drive 100 km/h safely. no bumps, caught 3 screws, all the rules.

I stood on a car from the factory, skated 10,000 km, it feels great, there is practically no wear today, it doesn’t inspire confidence, but it doesn’t give a reason to be disappointed, I think if it’s worth the money to buy, but I’ll change it for the next season, I want quieter tires

Soft, wear-resistant. Got pros: I skated 60 t. Km on the Hyundai Solaris. I also bought new ones from this company. The rubber is good. Has cons: What was the protector, you will not find this. Looks like everything is getting better.

I read the comments, thanks people. The conclusion is this - a quiet noisy hard soft road does not hold, it is not more reliable, rubbish, the best in terms of price-quality ratio. rubbish, drove 100,000 norms. 10,000 fell apart.

Higher Has pros: Quiet, moderately soft, comfortable, brake confidently on wet osvalte, on the track the car rides easily, straight and quiet. Got cons: Weak sidewall, inaccurate crossing over high rails (at the junction of the rails), tore the sidewall and two cords of the wheel had to be changed

I've been running these tires for 2 weeks. There are no roads in Hong Kong, so the feeling of driving through the pits is worthy. On the wet track is confident. On wet sand with clay it goes confidently. In general, satisfied! There are doubts about the sidewalls, because they are very soft. Time will show. But for now, I appreciate it.

In general, good rollers, but its noise is of course a bad thing. Price quality I guess. Personally, my choice is in the direction of quality, safety and comfort. You can’t save on rubber, it’s better to overpay, so I don’t recommend it! For 3+

185/65/15, rio. The sidewall seems to be solid. Muzzle 2.3, rear 2.2. After warming up, the properties change slightly. Rubber for those who are not interested in driving pleasure and will not interfere with acoustic discomfort.

They stood from the salon to the Hyundai Elantra. I skated the first season not particularly finding fault, but realizing that they are noisy and the steering wheel on the car is not very informative on them. Now changed shoes again on them and immediately want to sell them. Very noisy, even at low speeds, any roughness of the asphalt is transmitted to the body and steering wheel, it terribly infuriates. You can put up with noise when you buy tires for active driving where the noise is…

I bought it based on the reviews how soft and quiet it is. 235/55/17. The rubber is really soft to the point of disgrace. Tiguan has lost all composure and now sways on any bumps. Braking is lousy too. But the main thing, and because of what rubber was bought, is the hope for silence, which failed miserably. In the first month it really seemed that it was quiet, but after putting the wheels on after the winter, I was shocked by the noise. It was no louder on the spikes. In short, do not buy…

Good rubber for the track, wear-resistant. Operation on Opel Antara. I read a lot of reviews, including negative ones. But over 70,000 runs, wear is about 50%. I like. Maybe in other sizes rubber so Sibe. But in my size 225/70 R 16 103 h is great. I did not experience any problems or discomfort. Sidewall with index 103 is normal. Took 7000 per wheel. In this size. A slightly smaller size with an index of 98 cost 5700. You can safely take it for the track. My production is China.

Two years in operation. I drive like an unfinished Schumacher tractor driver. Those. I grind from a traffic light, collecting all the associated pits that I am too lazy to go around. I roll my wheels once or twice a year. The machine is front-wheel drive, weight 1200 kg. On rubber, at the same time, not a single hernia, wear for such a period is minimal. Before that, I only went to Nokian and Toyo. Before taking Kumho, I read reviews on tires with a price tag above average for a long time, read

Bought these wheels over a month ago. They changed their shoes at the service station, sat down, drove off . It felt like the pillows were wrapped on my wheels :) Very soft rubber. Many write that it will not last more than three seasons . maybe so, but what seasons will it be . comfort, silence and softness. During these 1.5 months, I managed to go from Hong Kong to St. Petersburg, to Hong Kong and ride around the Hong Kong Region. In the rain it is stable, the kaleynost is felt quite a bit…

A radial hernia popped up on the old rubber, so I had to change it. I chose tires based on the EU classification for economy. This rubber has economy B, braking on wet pavement C, noise level 69 dB. There is less noise compared to the previous rubber, the grip is good, the 110 rides normally on a winding road. That's just the high demands on the coating, since any hole in the turn leads to drift from the trajectory. My first rubber, which has a strong "rutting", on the first trip I did not…

-1 tyre: A longitudinal crack has formed to the cord of about 5 cm on the inner sidewall for no apparent reason. I found out about this due to the fact that it began to let down through it. This tire is about 75% worn. Not recommended for long trips. With its pros: Quiet, soft in the cabin comfortably. Small bumps go well. The weight is small, the car rides easily. Fuel consumption seems to have gone down. Good results in tests. Got cons: On pit-on-pit roads, there is an effect of inflated…

Hello to those who are looking for an adequate, real review of the same kid as you. The choice before me was not particularly worth it, it was necessary inexpensively and angrily. These did not consider at all, did not even know about them. In the store, during a conversation between me and the manager, a passer-by jumped into the conversation and told me that he had bought such grandfather and grandfather was happy for the second year. I read reviews like you, but of course everyone here…

In general, tires for C grade. Very budget friendly. I got it from the salon, so I probably would not have taken it. Kumho kh17 is even better in my opinion. In general, I would take for this money - toyo, yokohama (just not a drive), well, or a continental - if there is a lot of money) Different pros: There are no special benefits. All indicators are average, except for behavior on wet pavement. Some cons: Soft side. Profile 55 - The car steers disgustingly. Empty steering wheel near zero…