Kumho Ecsta PS31 195/50 R15 82V summer Review

I was looking for a replacement for the worn out Continental (rubber fire). The choice fell on this option because of the price and not bad reviews. Radius 18. 2-3 days after the purchase, I ran into a small hole at low speed and there was no rubber :) the disk made a large side cut incompatible with life: rides with me and for 2 months there are no problems with him. In general, I decided that I will not save more on rubber, although the price is horses for a radius of 18. If you don’t drive…

I am, on the whole, rather content with the tires. Previously, there was something known as Kontitech premium contact. When compared to Kumho, Contitech is like oak. I didn't see any signs of deterioration for maybe three months or four thousand kilometers.

225/45/17. To replace it, I purchased a kumho ecsta ps 71, which I used for two years and fifteen thousand kilometers. I wish I had repeated the 71st now that I know better. While the price differential is negligible, the difference in attitude is enormous. The 71st is superior in every way. It stops faster, turns sharper, and is more comfortable. BMW 120i, same as before. Driving approach: aggressive. Fair enough: the 31's stiffness may make it more resistant to wear, but that's not a…

I’ve been driving these for a long time, a strong board, a beautiful pattern, relatively strong for breakdown and hernia, no aquaplaning. November of the 22nd year came, not critical, but still, it’s already the 5th month of the 23rd year.

Excellent tires. For a long time I chose to replace Goodyear Excellence (size 225x55x17) with bmw f10 s/n. Mileage is currently 6 t. Km. So far, only positive emotions. Pros: Fairly quiet Good hydroplaning resistance Excellent traction on dry asphalt Reinforced sidewall low price With its cons: Sufficiently wide grooves on the rubber collect a lot of stones, which then fly out at speed into the next car . Quite sensitive to rutting, although less than Goodyear

195/55 R15 after winter tires did not expect such a noise, already at 90 it lays ears, alas . Made in Vietnam. The tread pattern - yes, beautiful. About the behavior on wet pavement while I can not say anything. Let's ride, there's already something .

Revealing the pros and cons.Some pros: Beautiful tread, reinforced sidewall, good price Cons below: I haven't found it yet, I'm waiting for the summer season

Recently, the roads were shifted in Hong Kong. Leaving them, I hear only the engine and the slight rustle of the wheels. If the road is ty, but a rumble is added.

It took me three weeks to decide on tires. In light of the fact that the tests of the wheel and other domestic periodicals are sponsored by advertisers (the infamous affair with Nokian), I made the decision to focus my attention on the Germans. I was able to locate a highly credible Autobild test, and in that test, these tires demonstrated performance that was on par with that of the highest quality premium tires, both when driving on dry and wet pavement. When they braked from speeds between…

It would not be accurate to claim that the tires have let me down. The type is in a "Oops" condition in the majority of cases. The reason for this is the noise. These benefits have not yet been properly recognized for what they are. Everything looks to be in "kayfovo" condition, but the "sediment" is still there. Be thoughtful in your purchasing, and best of luck. Various advantages: Ecsta PS31 225/45 ZR17 94W - tires for Skoda Oktavia A7 (1.8) In addition, the alloy wheels 17 KiK contribute to

The benefits include a size 235 50 17 Mercedes E 212 for a reasonable price. excellent tires that are 100m better than the Pirelli p7 cinturato. The handling is satisfactory, the brakes is forceful, and the vehicle glides over the speed bump very gently. Having these drawbacks: At temperatures lower than 3, potassium does not do well, although it is a far worse conductor of heat than the Pirelli p7 cinturato pirelli.

too much give! 215/50/17 To the point 3. Even when traveling at a slow speed, it is difficult to control; it slides around curves, and the angle on the street is only 10-15 degrees. From a car that was able to be precisely controlled, it mutated into a vegetable! This tire tread is not a good choice for people who take their driving very seriously. The speed of 120 kilometers per hour was manageable on these 80 kilometers per hour heels and drags out at the exits from the Ring Road when using…

At the beginning of April, Pereobul purchased his Toyota Corolla X. I drive 150km every day. Probuks are extremely rare and can only be found on asphalt that has small stones. Even when applying the brakes quickly in an emergency, the anti-lock system did not function. In temperatures up to plus five degrees Celsius, rubber takes on an oaky aroma, much like most summer tires. The option selected completely satisfies my expectations. Rubber has impeccable manners; it murmurs, it clings to the…

The directional stability system on a wet highway worked constantly . And the speed was up to 90 km. Although I may be nitpicking. Others were also in no hurry to get into the left lane with a wet track. Compare it with nothing.

Size 195/55 15. Weight is lighter than average, about 8.5kg. Production Vietnam. From the manufacturer's website: "UHP class tire, race tested, with the ECSTA logo"))) race tests were carried out similar to 40 km / h)) The sidewall is too soft, you can forget about the clarity of control when cornering, and of course be more careful in the pits (if it doesn’t work out, then slow down to the pit, but not in the pit) BUT the grip and braking distance is on the level, 4 out of 5! Those. tires for…

I can not say that the tires are disappointed. In general, the state of the type is "Oops". It's because of the noise. These advantages have not yet been fully appreciated. Everything seems to be "kayfovo", but the "sediment" remained. Think when buying, good luck. Pros below: Ecsta PS31 225/45 ZR17 94W - tires for Skoda Oktavia A7 (1.8) The appearance is excellent along with alloy wheels 17 KiK. The controllability of the car has become "sharper" and more "responsive", at speed it confidently…

too soft! 215/50/17 At focus 3. even at low speed it is poorly controlled, it falls in corners, and on the street it is only 10-15 degrees. From a very well-controlled car turned into a vegetable! For those who love active driving, this rubber is not suitable! at the exits from the Ring Road on the old tires, the speed of 120 was comfortable on this 80 already heels and drags out. I regretted taking it! my old Michelin Primacy HP nearly bald handled much better. I don’t understand how you need…

Different pros: Price, low noise, comfortable, soft, after changing winter tires did not notice the difference. Cons below: Not the best handling, But without frankly unpleasant surprises.

Departure for them for more than 6 months (about 12 thousand km). Tires are very soft. I pumped up more pressure than recommended so that it did not pierce the disk (nevertheless, no punctures, etc.). Good tires for a very humane price. Got pros: Excellent grip and braking with a very active ride (for this 5+). Very quiet. They ride in the wet like they drive in the dry. Wear is very small. Has some cons: The wildest fear of a rut. Even on a road that is apparently even (i. E., only the…

There was a task: a new kit is optimal in terms of most indicators of the middle price segment and make the car a little softer without big losses for drivability for general roads (not for the track) - changing Pirelli 225/50 17 to kumho 215/55 17. Satisfied with the result, with no choice wrong. What I got: less noise, more comfort, while the pressure is a little more, but the consumption has become less. Sharp braking at a speed of over 100 is good, I didn’t jump off the trajectory. It's…