Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 34
  • 5
    18
  • 4
    8
  • 3
    5
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

Bought in size 225/50/17 at Zafira S. Produced in Vietnam. First impressions are positive. Rulitsya well, on a track (Hong Kong highway) is confident, the steering wheel does not pull. Noise within acceptable limits - I did not expect miracles, but I was pleasantly surprised. I haven’t ridden in the rain yet, I don’t know how it behaves on water. Let's see. In general, I am satisfied, I can recommend. I will add after a month of exploitation, and more than 1500 km. Tires are great. Wet handling

Pros
  • Stiff sidewall, interesting tread pattern, good rut handling
Cons
  • Didn't find

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, I'm glad I chose this option.

2 seasons on Ford Kuga 2022 1.6 4x4. Kumho ECSTA PS31 235/55 R17 103W (12.0kg bottle), pressure 2.4bar all. At 190 km / h in the summer I liked it after the regular Hankook DynaPro HP. In the city (up to 120 km / h) they allow you to do any trick. Dry asphalt no complaints. In the wet, that would blow the car 1.7t need to try very hard. Large puddles, small puddles - no hydroplaning observed. In the off-season, I drove up to + 1C, worse than in the heat, but for city speeds (up to 100) it is…

Pros
  • Overclocking Controllability. Braking. Disc breaker. There was one puncture with a self-tapping screw, it was repaired with high quality (photo 4), it does not let through.
Cons
  • Stones get stuck in the tread and large ones are audible.

245/45/17 Mercedes E-200, Mercedes V class 225/55/17, there is not much noise but not critical, on different surfaces the noise level practically does not change. Before that, there was nokia blak, so she howled on the granular asphalt. The joints are smooth. Road holding is excellent, in a rut behaves well too. Yam caught enough problems, no, although there is how lucky. Satisfied with this tire.

Pros
  • Excellent tires.
Cons
  • Mercedes E-200 All the same, she wears out faster than others (but nokia blak dies even faster). In the second season it became more noisy. Bought a second time, and put on a Mercedes V class. The front ones are normal, the rear ones are for replacement after one season (rear mileage drive is 20-25 thousand).

Revainrating 1 out of 5

What a horrible quality, wasted money for nothing.

255/35/18, ride for a week Miser pays twice. I decided to take cheaper tires and . I sit and choose another one. The car has turned into a boat, although even that one is better controlled. After 80 km he staggers, talks, falls, feeling that he moved from Mercedes to five. More than 140 is really scary to drive, the feeling that you will fly off the road, in general, you should not save on rubber, take A brands

Pros
  • Price
Cons
  • Controllability

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Pereobul his Toyota Corolla X in early April. I drive 150km every day. Probuks are rare, only on asphalt with small stones. The ABS never worked, even during emergency braking. Rubber up to a temperature of +5 is slightly oaky, like most summer tires. I am very pleased with the choice. Rubber behaves perfectly: it whispers, it clings to the road, it is not afraid of water. My preferences are completely satisfied.

Pros
  • Soft on bumps and potholes low noise No hydroplaning Excellent cornering and speed stability Excellent grip
Cons
  • Constantly wants to get out of the asphalt rut I think durability is average.

Low-profile size 225-40 R18 - before that, Nexen had all 4 wheels full of hernias, so when choosing, I studied market offers for a long time and the main thing was the presence of a reinforced sidewall, and Kumho PS31 at that time turned out to be a new model with such parameters. For all the time it was easily balanced, there were no problems, it was erased evenly, if you keep a good pressure of at least 2.5. Noisy is for sure, both in the city and on the highway, not at all economical, but…

Pros
  • Wear-resistant tire, durable sidewall breakdown. Price. Beautiful design.
Cons
  • Noisy and uneconomical. Heavy.

HONDA Civic 5D. after installing this rubber, the impression seemed to have moved to a "dvenashku". I don't know how people write about "sensitive steering" and all that. Maybe I got something wrong? The car floats in "turns", the steering wheel is wadded, it does not react to small wiggles of the steering wheel. In turn, you need to constantly steer-control. Prior to this, there was COOPER ZENON, compared with not a complete disappointment in handling. But softness-smoothness has increased.…

Pros
  • Price, Soft. low noise
Cons
  • Controllability

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The purchase brought only positive emotions.

I took in the dimension 225/45 ZR17 94W XL on the Audi A3. Dunlop SPORT MAXX 225/45 R17 91W factory tires wore out after 66,000 km. It's time to change, but the budget in the conditions of high price tags tightened itself, I had to choose at an average price. After scouring reviews and seasonal price reduction + tavern as a gift, I chose this one. In terms of workmanship, made in Vietnam, they are worthy and look solid. Yes, this is not Dunlop, soft sides are alarming. But in terms of softness,

Pros
  • Good. Good directional stability, braking and handling are beyond praise for a tire at a price that is low and quite outperforms competitors, the best in its segment. Comfortable and not noisy. Disk protection. Premium.
Cons
  • Soft side. The rebuild is not so sharp, not a sport. Maneuverability is not the same as on UHP tires. During emergency braking, a whistle is observed, Dunlop has never behaved like this, don’t rely on a short brake like UHP.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product is good, there are only a few minor flaws.

I’ll make a reservation right away that we are talking about the size 235/50 R 17 101 W. Why focus on dimensions and indices? Yes, because the same tire of the same model will have different characteristics depending on the dimension, load index and speed, and the car on which you ride this tire. It's strange that people leaving reviews do not understand this. And stupidly, according to the model, without even indicating the size, reviews are fucked up . about handling . rigidity . comfort and…

Pros
  • Execution . Braking. Turns. Appearance.
Cons
  • Rutting. Controllability. Dubina with index 101.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

The quality is ok on the whole, it has some small flaws.

ate two years later: they begin to hit hard on wear and tear. They float because the grooves are fake and shallow. They give the impression of demi-season or autumn / spring tires. Residents of hot regions, I would not recommend taking. Apparently, due to the softness of the composition and the more flexible sidewall, they are better kept on unstable surfaces - I have never seen sharp breaks, it slowly slips all the time. Not that the feature of this rubber, but not so pleasant, but not…

Pros
  • ate: they don't hold water. Soft. Ideal for slightly pitted roads, junctions on bridges, speed bumps: all of these are passed at a faster pace than the Michelin Primacy for example. It rides well on a wet, dirty, dirt road, you can fry at 150 on the side of the road - it's normal. Kolya is not felt.
Cons
  • Derzhak is worse than Michelin's for sure. The ABS kicks in a bit early on the pavement, in a turn you overload it a little at the entrance - and howls, sliding down. The withdrawals are too big, the reaction to the steering wheel is a little more blurred - it is necessary to work with the steering wheel more roughly. I think that wear resistance will also not be the highest.

Yeti car, tires 225 55 R17. Bought for 23 The operating experience is excellent. As for the resource - the question is open. Tread depth - 9mm. Tires with an elastic character, while not oaky and not noisy. Has pros: Review based on several days of ownership, what I liked (added after a month of ownership): brake and turn well on dry and wet; low noise; elastic, swallow microrelief coating With its cons: New tires require shrinkage on the disc and rebalancing after 500-1000 km. Cad in…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best I ever used, recommend it to everybody.

I have been using it for more than a week, size 225/50 R17, Honda Accord 9 car. The wheels were bought to replace the regular Michelin, which has faithfully skated more than 80 thousand km. After changing the wheels in the cabin silence (Michelin after 50 thousand km became noisy). The wheel is not felt. Tire pressure 2.5. The rubber is very soft. It is not yet clear how it will behave in the heat. Definitely worth their money! You can take it for a comfortable, measured and fast ride both in…

Pros
  • No noise, price.
Cons
  • While they are not.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

Pros below: size 235 50 17 mercedes E 212 for the money good tires 100m better than Pirelli p7 cinturato. handling is good, braking is tenacious, the speed bump passes very gently Cons below: Potassium is not very fond of at temperatures below 3, but it is much worse than Pirelli p7 cinturato pirelli.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The right product for me, there were no problems.

I spent 3 weeks choosing tires. Considering that the tests of the wheel and other domestic magazines are paid for (the famous scandal with Nokian), I decided to turn towards the Germans. I found a very authoritative Autobild test and there these tires showed themselves at the level of the most premium tires both on dry and wet pavement. They were only 10-20 cm behind the leaders in braking from a speed of 80 and 100 km / h. At the same time, the price for a 16 "cylinder turned out to be 3,500…

Pros
  • The price is like that of domestic, and the quality is like that of premium rubber. Also beautiful
Cons
  • Too early to judge