- Mouse quality. Works great. Price.
- Not found.
- Communication range, duration of work, response speed.
- Loud buttons, too light pressing.
- Ergonomics, light weight, simplicity of design without unnecessary lights and any other crap. The sensor is just the bomb. Lightspeed technology is also a cool thing, the feeling of freedom of the mouse gives a bang. The legs are also excellent, the glide is just perfect (before that, there was a4tech bloody v8 with metal legs, I also liked everything. But it’s better here). Clear and adequate software.
- Same lightspeed technology. She has one nuance. I have not fully tested it yet, but in the early stages I will describe something. What is this technology? Wireless connection of the mouse to the computer without losing the quality of the transmitted signal. The only condition is the location of the receiver 20-30 cm from the mouse in direct line of sight (fortunately, the extension cable is included). Everything is awesome. But in my case, a router is located next to this receiver (repair in the apartment, while it is standing like that). The computer is connected to it not directly, but via wi-fi 2.4Ghz through the usual Tp-link USB plug. When the load on the network is from 5 MB and above, the connection between the transmitter and the mouse starts to slow down, as I understand it, the channel is interrupted. I can’t really say yet, is the router interrupting like that, or is the connection of the router plug itself. Place the router away from the car while it is not possible. But, I think, if you put it somewhere in the hallway, then the problem will dry up by itself.
- I don't know what to say here. I have not been using frankly cheap and bad manipulators for more than 15 years, so my experience is simple - it works and does not raise questions.
- Not detected
- I liked the ability to quickly change the DPI (4 fixed values configurable through the application) by pressing a button on the mouse. It works for quite a long time on one battery in the mode of mainly office work with a rare game mode.
- The quality of materials is too cheap. The mouse is very light for me, without shifting the center of gravity to the surface. The buttons are quite loud and hard. The wheel is not rubber, but plastic. Lack of receiver protocol backwards compatibility with logitech unifying.
- Very comfortable, autonomy is very good, the most tenacious wheel (which is why I took it) 5 DPI modes
- Very loud click. The sharp corner of the black plate between the wheel and the DPI button.
- + unfortunately there are no alternatives if you want a light, high-quality mouse in a classic case + classic case + light (when using AAA, generally less than 90 grams) + sensor quality (even in economy mode) + the quality of the actual mouse + works for a long time + NOT battery + AA or AAA batteries can be used
- As such, there are no shortcomings. There are some features. - the case creaks if squeezed (does not interfere at all) - no keys on the wheel left / right - could put an inertial wheel - slightly loud click
- Excellent mouse, wireless, accuracy, autonomy, connection quality, works on any surface, light (minus for some), build quality
- price (more expensive than analogues)
- Weight, comfortable shape, battery included
- Not very clear software
- small size Radio channel stability Sensor Reliability Fine tuning via LGS, incl. you can set the high sensor frequency mode to work only in games, and in everyday tasks you can use the mouse in economy mode.
- Slippery - if you take it with dry hands (after washing and wiping, for example), it is simply impossible to hold it. Shape - the sides of the mouse converge downwards, because of this, the grip becomes even less reliable. The side buttons are small, to press, you need to make an effort. In general, they are pressed easily, but because of the small area they simply miss the fingertip, remaining in place. Also, with an incomplete grip, when the fingers lie approximately in the middle of the length of the main keys, the thumb barely reaches the edge of the nearest button. If you put your palm completely, the thumb completely covers the nearest button, not reaching the far one. How Logitech managed to do this is unclear to me. The side buttons had to be moved to the side of the hand by at least a centimeter and made at least twice as wide. The wheel is moderately tight, the cutoffs are more or less clear, its drawback is that the force of holding the button in the pressed position is too great. It's hard to explain, but the G403 had the same pressing force, but the button's membrane, after clicking, was not as eager to return to its original position, so it took less effort to keep the button pressed than to press it. Not so with the G305, the finger quickly gets tired of holding the wheel down.
- Wireless, lightweight and low latency
- Maybe I'm not lucky and double clicks will start, I hope for a guarantee.
- It glides well over the surface, the sensor works clearly, the sensitivity switch button is adjusted to different values through the proprietary utility
- Unpleasant lightness, primitivism of the body shape, loud button clicks, a general feeling of cheapness of manufacture, high price
- Classic shape, excellent sensor, excellent mass, the software allows you to configure absolutely everything.
- First of all, the connection, at a distance of 60 cm from the system unit, the connection "floats", the router and other possible sources of interference are not close. Also, the side keys are not very responsive.