Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 56
  • 5
    41
  • 4
    8
  • 3
    3
  • 2
    1
  • 1
    3

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The perfect purchase for me, exactly what I was looking for!

I bought a cropped camera second to the D700, after the first shots I got the impression that the D700 would be the second camera. All my optics (16-35, 24-70 and 28-300) fit well on it, all front and back focuses converged. The first picture in the store when buying this camera is here http://fotki. . Ru/users/sv1950-4/view/767458/?page=0 With hands at 1/20 sec and an open hole, I suggest watching this shot to everyone who screeches in discussions about 100% shake with shutter speeds longer…

Pros
  • Ergonomics, very soft shutter release, two AutoBBs, the second with red retention, finally the virtual horizon does not disappear after pressing the Fn button, as in the D700. Gorgeous detail. A resized image up to 4256x2832 (like the original D700) is much better in quality than the aforementioned original D700. There is a second frame format for 15 megapixels. Very capacious battery. Excellent autofocus.
Cons
  • I have not found any shortcomings yet, except that it requires expensive top-end optics with a stabilizer. So it will not hurt all the cameras.

Revainrating 1 out of 5

A complete disaster, the product definitely did not pass the quality check!!!

I do not advise anyone and anyone to contact this device, if you are a professional and value your portfolio, this camera will technically ruin the most brilliant shots! Worst Nikon camera ever! I will never stop wanting to reshoot my entire archive from 2022 to 2022 in full frame! But alas - the elbow is close, but you will not bite! Take me back to those years and give me the D600, D800. Or give D7000 After 4 years of filming on the D800 and on various Sony E crops, I realized how did I shoot

Pros
  • Rewritten review after 6 years! 1) The sharpest matrix of all SLR nikon crops on the market, until the release of the D7200. But this sharpness is terrible cheap, rough, tough! 2) With good optics, high sharpness at low ISO 100-200). Only regarding crops! But who needs snotty sharpness without detail? Part quality NO 3) Ergonomics - moderately comfortable grip and optimal weight. Reliability They thought very well of transferring this standard of convenience to the 600s 4) General build quality and traditional Nikon quality plastic 5) Relatively accurate AUTO WB. 6) Long battery life
Cons
  • 1) Monstrous, dirty, noisy, grainy matrix. Noticeably grainier and noisier than the D5200, which has ISO up to 1600 unconditionally working. At 7100 at ISO 400 outdoors on a cloudy day, the picture just falls apart. Disgusting dirty noise in the shadows when underexposed. Noisy in backlight even at ISO 100. When you zoom in, you can see the grain - on a full-frame camera this is not at all, everything is clean. The picture of the camera is rough, very hard, excessively sharp even with the default sharping +5 with poor fine detail. Despite the fact that 24mp gives free rein to cropping, cropped shots look terrible, without noise reduction, even at ISO 100. 2) Poor video quality on any optic, even at 1080i, is noticeably worse than everyone else, even the oldest and cheapest Sony UPCs. It is not possible to control the hole in the video. 3) Fatal spots of shutter oil quickly appear on the matrix (in the SC they slightly scratched the matrix because they stupidly couldn’t wipe off a couple of spots!). The enlightenment of the viewfinder is unstable + it quickly becomes clogged with dust from the inside. 4) The color is irresponsibly felt-tip pen, burnt, acid, tear out the eye. Indescribably terribly conveys greens and reds (vyryglaznaya acid). Absolutely every color on this camera is transmitted incorrectly with a whole bunch of dirty stray shades that do not exist and never really existed. 5) Focus misses with old screwdriver glasses. 80-200mm, which on the D800 hits 2.8 perfectly on target, on the D7100 it focuses as it should every other time. 6) Extremely sensitive to exposure and hand shake errors - all 24 pm crops with a small pixel suffer from this. There is always a risk of getting micro-blur off your hands when shooting in RAB and JPEG L. Even the mirror flapping in S can cause micro-shifting.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Not a bad product, quite normal quality.

and the “but” is this: I don’t know if this claim is to the camera or to the store or to me in general, but after 3 months when I went south, during the next shooting, the display became sharply bright, and then went out and didn’t turn on anymore, and the camera itself filmed. When I arrived at the service center to hand it over under warranty, they carried out diagnostics and said that moisture got inside the display and corrosion started, which caused the display to burn out, this is not a…

Pros
  • Very comfortable to hold, like a glove in the hand. Pictures of excellent quality. Navigation is clear and convenient. Good focus.
Cons
  • Haven't found any cons yet, but.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

The best thing for the money, Im glad I chose this option.

I took 5100 as a replacement. Heaven and earth. I have a Sigma 50mm F / 1.4, I smeared it at 5100 AF, corrected it at 7100, and it hits right on target. The battery is good, enough for ~ 1000 frames + a couple of short videos, you can easily buy a butblock with 2 batteries in the kit, since it costs 3000 in total. There are noises - it's not scary, as it was written above, they are not visible at custom sizes. Color problems? Yes, show me where they are not, this is not even a minus . On the…

Pros
  • I took it for 30, so the advantage is the price) Two slots for SD. Completed 2x32 10class. Built-in AF correction.
Cons
  • There is no protective screen - in the film immediately (as described above). A series from RAW saves for a long time.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent quality, absolutely not expected for such a price.

Especially for those who are dissatisfied with the size of the buffer and the speed of the series: the problem is far-fetched. Of course, if you shoot exclusively running cheetahs, then yes, it will not work for you. The rest can take and rejoice. The speed of the camera controller is 45mb/s for maximum recording. Top sandis, if you take them, are only for show-offs. After 3 years of using the Nikon D3000, there was almost no need to retrain. The possibilities are incomparably wider, the…

Pros
  • - Autofocus is flawless. after the D3000 it’s amazed that it’s no longer necessary to peel in series, all frames are in focus - there is noise, as with any digital camera. but they start to interfere and require significant processing somewhere with iso 1600. draw conclusions - I don’t want to discuss color reproduction, for RAW this concept is by, but still, by default, the D3000 didn’t lie around - service LCD screen with backlight, all the necessary functions on separate buttons (plus you can customize it for yourself) - 24MP is never redundant, there will be no “micro-shaking”, unless you, of course, are a fan of second hand exposures. - the screen is very cool. but this can also be written down as a disadvantage - it drains the battery
Cons
  • - the shutter button is indistinct: a short stroke to focus, a long stroke to the shutter release. can be lubricated inadvertently. - the assembly is doubtful (I have Taiwan). Everything seems to be in order, but the feeling of fragility does not leave. plugs (battery, connectors, flash drive) are rather weak - heavy. yes, plus the tamron 17-50 outweighs . but it's more of a nitpick

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Average purchase, there is something to complain about.

It became possible to change the D7000 to the D7100 (with the second camera, the first NIKON D 810). I have good optics NIKON 24-70 / 2.8, 85-1.4, etc. What immediately caught my eye: -Dynamic range is just awful. Either the sky is heavily embossed, or everything else is dark. The matrix mode simply does not work, I constantly enter exposure compensation, use other measurements, bracketing, etc. Then be sure to pull RAW. About automatic modes! Whoever writes that a DSLR is not for this, but

Pros
  • Ergonomics, autofocus, image quality.
Cons
  • Dynamic Range

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, I definitely recommend it!

Compared to the D90, great progress. A juicy, sharp picture, and if you shoot straight, it cuts to the quick. I'm using a DNG converter, don't want to change photoshop. The autofocus adjustment feature is very useful, 50mm 1.4 stopped missing in principle, and now you can shoot at 1.4. It is better not to shoot at 6400 in the dark - there are too many noble noises, as a result, a clear picture is 1.5 MP instead of 24. However, even at 6400 it unexpectedly well, to a pleasant level, retains…

Pros
  • The color in the picture is excellent, the megapixels are all honest as one, the autofocus shoots exactly where they say, the video just flies away at 60 fps FullHD, the autofocus adjustment is a bold plus. Lots of buttons, great display, fits perfectly in the hand.
Cons
  • What could be done to get 3 percent of the rating up to a hundred: in the video, make FullHD without additional. crop, improve the in-camera jeep (it lathers significantly compared to that of the D90 and with its own rav), improve work with completely manual lenses (for me, the exposure metering works in a narrow range and for some reason the auto ISO falls off). Buffer (nitpicking). These are trifles.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

An excellent camera in every way. Highly recommend to everyone, both beginners and pros. It will be an excellent camera for reporting and macro photography. The camera drawing is magical. I can not explain. but really like it. On the D800, for example, it is kind of dry, neutral or something. On the D7100, it's the other way around - the colors sing and the heart cries :) Macro by the way is very lively on it. The camera loves fixes, oh how it loves. And most importantly - the BB on it is…

Pros
  • - Excellent BB! Nikon! You are good! BB works better than on D800 / E ! Please don't go back to Sony sensors. They are not the best on the market. The sensor from Toshiba on the D7100 is a huge confirmation of this! - Excellent color reproduction and contrast. Photos on fixes just sing, and the photographer's heart cries with joy :) - Excellent autofocus (though with reservations, see comments below). Hits the target almost like on the D800
Cons
  • - Confident not noisy ISO - 1600 ceiling. Then artifacts are already noticeable. But this is on the built-in noise reduction. When using third-party programs for post-processing, you can completely pull out 4000-6400 ISO without much loss. - Autofocus from the "factory" is not very set. Went through several cameras. One way or another, there were problems. I chose one more or less normal carcass and then manually aligned the three adjusting screws under the bottom cover at home. Who needs it - look in search engines for the setting of three AF ​​adjustment screws on Sony and Nikon DSLRs. There is information. The same problem was on the D7000 before. - No in-camera autofocus correction when changing aperture on the lens. (See comments below)

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I didn't expect the quality to be so high.

Landscape, simple, sporty - shoots perfectly, does not require takes. The shutter works flawlessly, it doesn’t lather, unless of course you’re crazy and you approach shooting wisely, don’t twitch and don’t throw yourself at subjects like a lion on meat, although this is sometimes necessary, Well, the pictures are excellent in color, of course, you need to disturb your head a little and pens ! Whoever wants, longs to do not something, but only good, take it, you won't regret it! The device is…

Pros
  • I've been shooting on the D7100 for 6 months now. There was 3100, but it was not enough, then with the settings, then the color rendition did not suit. So basically, according to all the specified parameters, it worked fine, but it lacked a little. I chose for a long time I stopped at the D600 and went, but on the counter only d 7100 was taken apart from the box. I tried to take a couple of pictures and was stunned, this is a car - I was struck by the grip, it clings instantly, and the pictures on the monitor and detailing, there are simply no words. I shot in low light, and such a color rendition, I asked how much for it and grabbed it. I don't regret an ounce. Everything suits me. A week ago I took a fix fifty kopecks, but this is generally something ! And what will happen next . Well done Japanese ! When will ours begin to move their brains?
Cons
  • These were not found. They say that the speed is too small, so it's not AKM - immediately for the entire clip.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Everything is fine, I liked the product, I bought it for a reason.

Before him was the Nikon 5100. So it took a long time to get used to the controls of the d7100. Everyone who writes that the nikon d5100 is for beginners, they have enough of it with their heads - complete nonsense. I fell for these stories and took the d5100. After a month it was already not enough for me, although I had not shot it on a SLR before. The d5100 takes good pictures, but you constantly have to waste time going into the menu and choosing other settings. This makes those I…

Pros
  • It lies comfortably in the hand, the professionalism of the camera is immediately felt. 51 focus points are very tenacious. There are a lot of necessary buttons at hand, which were missing in the d5100 (which is actually why I changed the d5100 to the 7100). An interesting and useful 1.3 crop mode. From Fifty dollars almost portrait 65mm is obtained. Writes stereo sound of good quality, as well as video, in fact. Long battery life.
Cons
  • Noisy Matrix. Still overpriced. Screen d7100 - 1228800 dots, screen d5100 - 921000 dots. Didn't notice much of a difference. This is certainly not a drawback, but the pictures are about 10 Mb. Much, of course.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

The most expensive and most stuffed at the moment. Everything about it is good and fast. We don’t skimp, we buy, we rejoice. For those who don’t, we immediately run for high-aperture optics. Today I decided to purchase, no defects in the matrix. official guarantee. Autofocus is good. Bright viewfinder. With a manual fix without puff by hand, very very good. There is a conversation that a good glass and a mediocre body are better, I think that a good body and a good glass are better, and it…

Pros
  • The best device in this segment.
Cons
  • All models in this category have its shortcomings - it is a crop.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I am amazed at how well the product is made, just magically!

I immediately bought a Sigma 17–50, 2.8 for him. Very happy with everything. The size of the matrix often compensates for the small zoom of the lens. The quality of the video can be viewed here: https://vimeo. Com/user3347103/videos Even at night it looks great. Autofocus is very fast. When shooting video, the noise of the autofocus motor is heard, so it is more convenient to shoot video with manual focus. The HDR mode is very cool, especially for interiors. Photo examples: https://www…

Pros
  • Clear assembly. The video footage is great. The size of the matrix allows you to crop heavily. (Image size 6000 x 4000 pixels)
Cons
  • The camera is not for high-speed burst shooting, but I didn’t take it for that at all.

Revainrating 3 out of 5

There are pros and cons, think before buying.

It seems that Nikon cameras are supplied to the 2022 either from the culling of American and European batches, or made according to a simplified technical process . from my experience and my friends, EVERYTHING had to carry cameras after purchase for autofocus adjustment to the Nikon service, and there this phenomenon was considered the norm . the D610 simply lacked a scale of +20.-20 to adjust the front-back focus. And Nikon carcasses and lenses bought in the United Arab Emirates did not…

Pros
  • Good build, solid body. Convenient control, operational, practically does not require climbing in the menu during shooting. Excellent focusing on AF lenses without built-in processor, screwdriver lenses work stably, focusing is fast and reliable.
Cons
  • Autofocus does not work stably on AF-S lenses. Exposure metering, whether matrix or center-weighted, does not work adequately. The ADL mode is present purely nominally, how good it was on the D7000, how bad it is here. It is not possible to take a shot with guarantee, constant exposure glitches. you have to make duplicates. Nikon 50 mm f/1.4G AF-S Nikkor , Nikon 35 mm f/2D AF Nikkor , Nikon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G VR ED AF-S Zoom-Nikkor lenses. Camera firmware 1.03, lens distortion correction latest, 2022

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent functionality and quality

I've had my camera for about a week and I love it. I was looking for a camera that I wouldn't outgrow for years to come and that would satisfy my camera-loving husband, who has serious film photography gear that just isn't practical anymore. I bought a camera with an 18-140 lens. A lens that is an excellent all-round lens with medium zoom and macro capabilities. The camera has great features with special effects that you can add to images such as: B. Color sketches, thumbnails that make distant

Pros
  • Camera and photo
Cons
  • Requires power outlet

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Great camera on camera and photo

This is an improvement over my D3200. The differences in size and weight are significant and can be quite unexpected if you buy the site invisible. The body is the same size and shape as the Nikon D610. However, this camera isn't full-frame like the D610. It's a crop sensor, which means you need to multiply the focal length of your lenses by 1.5. Crop sensor cameras are both good and bad. For long-distance shots, this is great because it gives you "extra range". So your 200mm lens is now…

Pros
  • digital cameras
Cons
  • some errors

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Perfect next step after Canon G12 (Advanced P&S)

Since I have a Canon w/ External Flash Speed-lite 430 II, why switch brands when going to DSLR? User interface. The G12 has minimized the need to dig into the menu with all of its dials and buttons. Canon screwed up when they didn't do this on their APS-C sensor cameras. Want knobs and dials? D7100 or some of the Pentax DSLRs, but the latter is weak in lens choices. (I want a Tamron 150-600 long telephoto. Shame if you have a Pentax camera.) Any DSLR, just with a larger sensor, will have better

Pros
  • Electronics
Cons
  • No Power