Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
πŸͺš psi woodworking lccfile diamond credit logo

πŸͺš PSI Woodworking LCCFILE Diamond Credit Review

3

Β·

Excellent

Revainrating 5 out of 5Β Β 
RatingΒ 
5.0
πŸ’„ Finishing Products, πŸͺš Abrasive & Finishing Products

View on AmazonView on Π―M

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to πŸͺš PSI Woodworking LCCFILE Diamond Credit

Description of πŸͺš PSI Woodworking LCCFILE Diamond Credit

Sharpens HSS, carbon steel, and Carbide. Set includes (2) 3-1/4" x 2" 2-sided diamond files: 400x fine & 600x extra fine grits. Sharpen knives, chisels, Router bits, saw blades scissors, or anything else that needs a sharp edge. Ideal for sharpening removable cutting tips on Carbide tipped tools.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    3
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    0
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Ideal for sharpening milling cutters.

These are easy to use and very effective for sharpening cutting tools. They worked very well with my cutters which have become dull over the years. I like the shape - it's easy to work with and I like the two different grits of abrasive.

Pros
  • Set includes (2) 3-1/4" x 2" double ended diamond files: 400 x fine and 600 x extra fine grit
Cons
  • unreliable

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I really like them: Whetstones

The first set of filing cabinets I tried but they work great. Good for honing turning tools between grinding and pretty much anything else. They held up well after I went through the sharpener, still flat and cutting. In my opinion it is worth its price.

Pros
  • Perfect for sharpening replacement cutting tips on carbide tipped tools
Cons
  • Crumpled

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Very good so far. fits hand tools

Easy to use, could have used better instructions. Watch a few online videos and you're done. Bigger would be better, but it's a comfortable size. Grit markings (300/600) on each would be nice but you can use the marker yourself and it comes in separate bags within the packaging.

Pros
  • HSS, carbon steel and carbide sharpener
Cons
  • Could have chosen a newer model