Sony 24-70mm f/4 Vario-Tessar T FE OSS: Full Frame Zoom Lens Review and Features Review

I have been using it for over 4 years. One of the most commonly used lenses is a station wagon. First of all, it is compact and small and light. The lens is great for shooting video, especially handheld, due to good stabilization. The autofocus is also very good. He is very fast, as well as tracking. The focus ring, however, is very sensitive and very difficult for them to do everything accurately on video. The picture is a little disappointing, firstly it's F4, and secondly it's not very…

completely metal, sharp, contrasting, The dimensions are not large, it fits completely in the palm of your hand, it is in harmony with the Sony A7 / A7r

I wanted to replace the whale 28-70 But when I tried it, It' Maybe this is a marriage, but I read a lot of similar reviews and disappointments.

The lens, in general, Its peculiarity is that for such a price, and now it’s already about fifty dollars, their own excessive expectations, against the background of the appearance of full-frame sevens and in conjunction with them, did not materialize . ) Another thing, if you don’t get attached to the price, as in the case of travel soapboxes in green or P modes - it is rather capricious to light, requires constant attention, thinking through the shooting conditions, taking into account its…

With a decent picture, it is a zoom, which is very convenient when reporting. Good optics. Convenient option. Different pros: Color. Excellent color rendering. Light colors without any tint imposed by the lens itself. Sharpness at its best. The lens provides excellent detail. In terms of color and sharpness, it can be safely classified as professional optics. Has some cons f4. It seems that F4 can lose to its competitor with an aperture of 2.8 from Tamron. But this is only if the value of the…

I bought it to pair with the A7. I thought between him and the fixes, but still decided in favor of the zoom. The picture of all 3 is boring. But the zoom is very convenient and it has a stabilizer. I'm glad they didn't make 2.8 because in my opinion this is the maximum lens size for reasonable use on the Sony A7. 2.8 would be very great. With its pros. An excellent lens for the money. Its real price is 32-35 thousand. Abroad, you can freely buy (which I did) Analogues from C and N cost the…

They took a7m2 to take off their clothes, even with aperture 4 and good lighting it gives a super contrast and sharp picture, I liked the work of the combination, where the stub on the matrix and the stub in the optics work together. For 7m2 is ideal in my opinion. When focusing, the sound of the motor is almost inaudible.

With a decent picture, it is a zoom, which is very convenient when reporting. Good optics. Convenient option. Its pros: Color. Excellent color rendering. Light colors without any tint imposed by the lens itself. Sharpness at its best. The lens provides excellent detail. In terms of color and sharpness, it can be safely classified as professional optics. Some cons: f4. It seems that F4 can lose to its competitor with an aperture of 2.8 from Tamron. But this is only if the value of the picture is

I read bad reviews, but I wanted a native AF zoom for the Sony A7. Through the adapter, of course, my entire Kenan zoo works, but focusing for 5 seconds is something. Handles are faster. But there are times when you need to quickly and oversized. On Sony A7, you can somehow carry another 17-40 / 4 from Kenon, and 24-105 is already too much. In short, I went and bought my native Sonya lens. On the way home I took a walk in the woods. Well, what can I say? There are no corners of failure (at…

I think that such a large brand as Sony should eliminate the consequences of marriage in their equipment. Even if it is bought abroad. After all, you can send a request to the country where the equipment was purchased, receive a confirmation of the sale-purchase, and then make repairs here, followed by sending prices for spare parts and work from the country where the lens was purchased. Be careful with the purchase of this model, because. after sitting on the forums, I came across similar…

I wanted to replace the whale 28-70 with something better and more worthy. I chose Zeiss 24-70. But when I tried it, I quickly became disillusioned. He was not sharp. It's good that I bought with the possibility of a return. Only in comparison I realized that the whale one is better. Maybe this is a marriage, but I read a lot of similar reviews and disappointments.

Sony a7s camera. I shoot through the subject and through his older brother sal 2470z f / 2.8 using the la-ea4 adapter. Pros of the subject: good balance with the camera, easily helps to avoid shake, especially when working with an electronic shutter; compactness for a kit of this level. Disadvantages of the subject: I would like the picture to be better; "buildup" on autofocus (but this is a question for the CAF of the camera). Now about sal2470. The older brother is better in everything…

I rushed about for a long time what to take, the choice, in principle, is small 2870 or 2470, there is nothing more to choose. Read reviews, asked forums. According to many 2022 reviews, do not take it at all, there is no difference with a whale other than 4. I found a review from one camera with these lenses under equal conditions and it turns out there is a difference, then I tried it and realized that if there is an opportunity, I should take it. I don't have any regrets after the purchase…

I use it with a7s for professional shooting and travel. It is good both in FF and in APSC, which gives additional focal lengths. For video, apsc is the best, so 105mm at the long end covers the needs of the trevolzum. The trunk after a year is like a glove (metal!), There is no dust collector, so the comrades here are lying, they simply haven’t used it yet, but they are already afraid. I am very pleased that it is light and small compared to the SAL2470. The stub allows you to acceptably take…

Measured weight - 465 g lens + 35 g lens hood = 500 g (0.5 kg ! ) With A7R camera - 1 kg (!) The dimensions are a monster - on the Sony A7R, the feeling of compactness disappears completely. Dimensions and weight are appropriate for a DSLR, not for a compact and lightweight mirrorless camera. A healthy and expensive 67mm filter is required, but this is a trifle. At 70mm on an open hole it is soft, but within the normal range. At 24mm on an open hole, the edges are not very good. 40mm…

I'm making a VIDEO! Photos are extremely rare. I have a Sony A7S first generation. The first time 2 years ago I took this lens to Germany. Then I bought myself. Since then, this is the only lens (not counting the Minolta 90s 1.4 manual). In general, sometimes with this lens you get such pictures that you think it's like Blackmagic (I'm exaggerating, of course, but the quality is sometimes amazing). And sometimes just ordinary shots. And there is enough sharpness and contrast and aperture (A7C…