Header banner
Revain logoHome Page

Reviews

Global ratings 33
  • 5
    18
  • 4
    10
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    2
  • 1
    2

Type of review

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Quality is top notch, happy with everything.

Concern Mihelin (BFGoodrich, Tigar) produces good tires. I change tires every year. Wear for such a period is minimal, the rubber retains its appearance for sale, it becomes possible to try different options. Tigar's price/quality ratio is excellent. Much more interesting than Korean options: Kumho, Nexen, Roadstone. There is no talk about Chinese brands at all. Most likely, it will take 2-3 years for them to catch up in quality at least to Tigar. I recommend to all.

Pros
  • The wide grooves minimize the chance of "living" in the stones, the pattern provides good grip. Soft, interesting tread pattern.
Cons
  • Currently not found.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice price, good quality.

The rubber model is designed for those who like to drive not fast, it floats in a turn if it is heavily laid at speed. In general, the tires are excellent if you are not a racer, for normal use I recommend 200%.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Excellent product, the best quality.

I use 2 weeks on Mazda 6 GH. 215/50 for 17. After TOYO, just a delight! The feeling is as if I put winter tires back on - a light steering wheel, a track, joints, pebbles, small pits are indifferent. Rails are not critical, speed bumps are friendlier. It's all about softness, but no one mentioned that they are also lighter than the rest, according to my info 4-5 kg ​​! The car just becomes different. I will not go into detail, who knows, he will understand why the wheels and suspension make it…

Pros
  • Soft, light and quite quiet. Nice drawing.
Cons
  • Probably softness is a drawback for integrity and wear. In the store, the installer pumped me 2.3, instead of the prescribed 2.2. He says it needs to be downloaded, he did not argue, it's obvious.

Bought at the beginning of summer 2022. Size 245/45/18. Went on her vacation to Bulgaria and then to Greece and back. The total mileage is more than 6500 km. No complaints about tires. It was balanced in 15-20, despite the fact that the disks have a mileage of more than 100 thousand km. In motion, everything is predictable. I did not notice hydroplaning in the rain, but, however, I slowed down to 100 km / h. I was driving at 180 km/h on the highway. ate as of 11/22/2022: Changed to winter…

Pros
  • Excellent tires in all respects. Moderately quiet, moderately soft, well managed. Inexpensive.
Cons
  • There are no such.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Satisfactory product quality, good price.

Excellent handling, good road holding. Very quiet. But there is a big drawback. Very soft sidewall, for the first time on the curb in the parking lot hooked, immediately torn. I managed to restore it at a tire shop when looking for vulcanization. And the second time I pierced, and did not notice how I lowered, while driving, literally 10 meters. And the sidewall of the tire was torn in 5 places.

Pros
  • -Excellent handling - Low noise
Cons
  • - Very unreliable sidewall. - Fast tread wear (very soft)

Revainrating 4 out of 5

I recommend to buy, the product is of high quality.

I put it on the Jaguar XF 3.0 S / C AWD on 05/02/2022. In terms of behavior, I really liked the rubber and I was very impressed with the handle in corners. Those. in a sharp turn, we can absolutely calmly add gas and not fly away ! For the cost of rubber, this is truly impressive. I was surprised by the wear resistance index (treadwear) 580! Maybe the standards have changed, because. tires were released on the 45th week of 2022. Because the car has good insulation, then I only heard this…

Pros
  • Price. Softness on pits, joints and other road irregularities. Derzhak on dry asphalt.
Cons
  • Noise in the cabin at high speed. (subjective matter) It also pops up at high speed, but does not knock it off course, the main thing is not to shake the steering wheel from side to side;)

Bought a little used in size 225/40/r18. At a speed of 160, I did not feel any vibration and beating, the noise was moderate. On dry pavement in the heat, there are almost no slippages at the start. It enters the turns confidently, but far from the sport of course. Machine 230 hp front-wheel drive. Different pros: Pretty quiet, handling and grip are normal, but far from premium brands. price relative to competitors Cons: soft side and the feeling that the tires are flat, although the pressure…

Revainrating 4 out of 5

The product did not disappoint, the quality pleases.

set a week ago at Optima 225/50/17, very satisfied, bought at 4400, they hold the road well, maybe this is largely due to the width, but everything suits me, I haven’t driven into puddles yet, but I checked the brakes on dry asphalt and felt got better. I put new wheels and new tires, but they hung loads, bless you, the tire fitter said that this rubber is always like this, but in principle everything is fine, it doesn’t hit, it doesn’t pull. I recommend!

Pros
  • good grip good price quite soft, swallows joints on asphalt
Cons
  • A little bit noisy, but maybe it will still roll

Before that was Hankuk. On my first trip to the Bashkir mountains I caught a hernia. And a couple of trips to Tigar were on gravel, sharp stones and pits caught, good condition. There is no hernia. If someone is looking for cheaper but good. That is an excellent choice. Himself tossed about, chose for a long time. I wanted to save money, because I did not plan to change tires. But after repairing the box, it was necessary to do a similarity collapse. But I didn’t know about it, as a result, all

Pros
  • holds up well in the rain primer also passes norms wear is also normal
Cons
  • To be honest, I haven't noticed any cons yet.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A valuable purchase, some advantages!

The price is at the level of Chinese tires (I have nothing against them - I haven’t used them), good reviews. There were questions about their durability, but for my runs I think that this can be neglected. I also could not justify the almost twofold difference in price compared to more famous brands. For me, it’s better to change a set of tires to a fresh one than to ride tired long-playing ones for a long time. As a result, we have round wheels, the car goes 0-180 without a hint of wheel…

Pros
  • Price. Soft, good grip

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Reliable purchase, guaranteed to be a good purchase.

I usually don’t write reviews, but read) I chose tires for a BMW 5k. 245/40/r18. I respect the bridge, but I began to notice that over time, when the rubber was worn, the car began to “scour” on the track. There is no such clear management. Decided to replace the TIGAR UHP. I liked the drawing, 2 times cheaper compared to premium rubber. Ran 1000 miles on the highway. Excellent handling on both dry and wet pavement! Satisfied with the choice. I recommend!

Pros
  • price, figure, manufacturer
Cons
  • No

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Nice product, happy with my purchase and may buy again.

One gets the impression that only dodiks are sitting here, who do not know to how many atmospheres low-profile tires need to be pumped. 225/40 is best to pump 2.5-2.6 atmospheres, otherwise those same beats appear, it breaks very easily, the car floats on the road, etc. all the negative reviews are like one and everyone is whining about softness and poor strength. Rubber is soft and not for racing

Pros
  • Handling compared to the previous brand rubber has increased. Quite soft, asphalt unevenness is less transmitted.
Cons
  • Noisy, almost noisy on the highway.

Revainrating 4 out of 5

Product satisfying the quality of the product, good price.

With its pros: Superbly holds the road, very soft, triangl was not near. Excellent European tires for your budget. Some cons: Everything is fine, the only thing is a very small protective edge of the disc rim even on profile 40. I also used a 50 profile, the side is even smaller.