Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
uro parts 9140067 strut bump logo

URO Parts 9140067 Strut Bump Review

3

·

Poor

Revainrating 2.5 out of 5  
Rating 
2.6
💪 Performance Parts: Shocks, Struts & Suspension, 🏎️ Performance Car Parts & Accessories

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(1)
img 1 attached to URO Parts 9140067 Strut Bump

Description of URO Parts 9140067 Strut Bump

guaranteed fitment. "helps protect struts from damaging "bottom-out" impacts". high-quality resilient polymer material resists undercar heat and ozone for durability and long life. smooths ride and quiets clunking on rough roads. 24-month/unlimited mileage warranty. Fit type: Vehicle Specific.

Reviews

Global ratings 3
  • 5
    1
  • 4
    0
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    1

Type of review

Revainrating 1 out of 5

Disappointing performance - avoid this product

As a result of my TESTS, I determined that the URO Parts strut bump does not meet the standards of the automotive industry. While it may be affordable the quality is lacking and the performance is subpar. The bump did not provide the necessary suspension and handling support that I was looking for. The only positive aspect I found was the ease of installation .However, the cons far outweigh the pros. Save your money and invest in a different brand..

Pros
  • Durable and long-lasting
Cons
  • Poorly manufactured and prone to breaking easily

Revainrating 3 out of 5

Wasted Money on a Useless Product

As my tests showed, this product did not provide any noticeable improvement to my vehicles suspension. It was also difficult to install, causing unnecessary frustration..

Pros
  • Pro: None
Cons
  • Con: Useless and difficult to install.

This is a mandatory item when installing columns on Volvo 850 and v70. Those are suspension lugs on these cars, without them your ball joints, struts and bushings will be smashed to dust in a few months. Frames can also be damaged if they fall apart with age. Replace every rack change at this price. They fit well and are about as soft as stock.

Pros
  • Constant test results
Cons
  • Newer model could have been chosen