Video baby monitor Kodak CHERISH C225, black Review

Bought last fall and use it almost every day. Mostly during the day, when the baby is sleeping, and I'm in the kitchen. I mainly use the parent screen as an audible alarm - when she starts to wake up, I immediately hear. Video is more convenient to watch on the tablet through the application. The application is simple. On a tablet, you can see better and it is more convenient to move the camera. Connected from the home network in a few minutes, since then it has been working like a clock. I…

Chosen based on function. I liked the application, for the rest the connection hangs between the blocks, I don’t know for whom it works fine, maybe it will still work between one wall, but everything is already hanging through the corridor. The model is new, they looked closely even before the birth of the child for half a year, in general, a waste of money!

The model was chosen on the advice of a consultant in the store, it turned out a little cheaper than 9 sput. At first they looked at the other one, but they outweighed the batteries in both blocks, took Kodak.

At first they wanted to take the C220, but for a number of reasons they took this one. It turned out they did not fail. We have twins, they sleep in different beds, and one camera does not show at the same time. This one has a remote control, I can turn it one way or the other.

This is the second camera. The first failed on the second day. Thanks to the technicians in the warranty department, they stepped into the situation and they returned the money to us literally in three days, and not in a month, as they could. We did not take the same one, we took Kodak.

This nanny is our first, I can not compare. I like that she helps with my daughter and that I no longer run every five minutes through the entire corridor to check how she sleeps there!

Useless piece of plastic! This is not a kodak, but some kind of Chinese manufacturer, because I called the kodak to solve problems, they generally have no idea what kind of devices they are! Do not buy in any case. Just wasted money!

In general, these are not Kodak cameras, but a Chinese brother under a foreign brand. In fact, the most important points, in my opinion: 1) Communication quality. The picture on such a small screen is one of the worst. About like phones with such a small screen. Usually, if they use the same matrix of large screens, everything should be clearly visible on small ones, but here, apparently, they decided to save money, hence the price. 2) In a one-room apartment, you can still somehow adapt, but…

The main selection criterion was, other things being equal, a camera with a battery and the ability to rotate. Criteria met 100%. I am satisfied with the purchase. With its pros: High quality and functional. There is a battery for both the monitor and the camera. Can turn. You can watch and control not only from the monitor, but also from any smartphone from anywhere. Catches a signal through a wall of foam blocks. Got cons: The battery on the camera is discharged in ~ 3 hours of operation.

They received the nanny as a gift, at first they were delighted, but after unpacking they realized that it was impossible to use it. Constant noise in the parent unit, I wanted to check if there would be noise through the application, but the camera could not connect to W-Fi. Terrible screen and overall responsiveness of the parent unit and camera. Management is not convenient.

When choosing a baby monitor, the main criterion for me was the ability to organize the operation of the camera without connecting to a 220V network, since our crib is located far from power outlets. Unfortunately, there are very few models with similar capabilities on the market, and Kodak CHERISH C225 is one of the very few. And in terms of the totality of technical characteristics, it is one of the best, so the choice fell on it naturally. And the old brand, familiar from childhood, did not…

They used it for a year, then they gave it to relatives; their baby was born. I recommend it makes life easier with a small child!

The baby monitor was chosen for several weeks. I read a lot of reviews, my husband asked in stores. We chose Kodak C225, it was recommended by sellers, and it turned out to be a good price / quality ratio. It was important for us to watch remotely from a smartphone and the fact that both units have built-in batteries. I did not find official information on battery life, but then practice showed that it was from 3 to 4 hours. If you fully charge, of course, and do not get carried away with…

I liked it. We inherited the previous one from friends, but broke after six months. Bought a Kodak. The company is well-known, I liked the characteristics. Pros: I was bribed by the fact that you can watch both on the parent unit and through the phone. The application has not yet been installed, I can’t say anything, but everything is visible on the monitor normally. Surprisingly, in the dark too. It catches through three walls, the previous one was already rented in the next room. Batteries in

People, do not buy this piece of Chinese city. If nerves and psyche are more expensive. At first it will work in a small apartment, then it gets worse! You turn on the TV, freezes begin. The description says that it reacts to sound, to movement . END! THAT she still reacts to the included appliances in the house, and that it will not work at the same time! Further, it broke down with us, the screen just turned white. There is no service as such, they just send you!

don't buy this g…but ! Support 0. The video stream does not transmit! Only motion and sound notifications! I did not expect such crap! By the way, read reviews about the program on the App Store

It works disgustingly, the image freezes at a short distance, it is not clear what is happening at that moment in the room, the picture just hangs, but the connection indicator scale is full. At night, it blinks suspiciously, as if someone else is connecting to it

The sites have incorrect information, not 300 meters like other baby monitors, but 200 meters. From here, apparently, the range of action in the premises, really only through the wall, and even then the picture freezes. Night vision photographed separately. Return

Very satisfied with the product. We have been using it for 3 weeks, no flaws have been identified. The plastic material is pleasant, it works almost without glitches.