Header banner
Revain logoHome Page
wrist watch casio mrw-200h-1b2 logo

Wrist watch CASIO MRW-200H-1B2 Review

13

·

Very good

Revainrating 4.5 out of 5  
Rating 
4.6
Sports and Outdoors, 🏕️ Outdoor Recreation, 🧥 Outdoor Clothing, 🏕️ Outdoor Recreation

View on AmazonView on ЯM

Media

(3)
img 1 attached to Wrist watch CASIO MRW-200H-1B2
img 2 attached to Wrist watch CASIO MRW-200H-1B2
img 3 attached to Wrist watch CASIO MRW-200H-1B2

Photos by authors

(1)
img 4 attached to Wrist watch CASIO MRW-200H-1B2

Description of Wrist watch CASIO MRW-200H-1B2

The Japanese company Casio was founded in 1946 in Tokyo by engineer Tadao Casio. To this day, it is famous for the production of calculators, audio equipment, cameras, musical instruments, tablets and watches. This model from the Collection series is made in a sporty style. The watch is equipped with a luminous coating and a calendar. The classic bracelet made of polymeric material combines in an original way with the dial, which is protected by acrylic glass. These watches will be the perfect complement to your look and will be unconventionally combined with any clothes.

Reviews

Global ratings 13
  • 5
    9
  • 4
    3
  • 3
    1
  • 2
    0
  • 1
    0

Type of review

I took it for swimming and forays into nature, tired of breaking my eyes in the bright sun about a fitness bracelet, which, moreover, does not always respond to raising a hand. They carry out their task, time is visible in any situation from a half-look.

Pros
  • Lightweight, not bulky, information is read well, not afraid of water. Restrained design, on a girl not of an inch height and physique look organic
Cons
  • The arrow slightly smears past the divisions, but this can be fixed in the workshop

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for this price.

I have been a fan of Orient Mako mechanical watches for a good number of years now (yes, my friends, I am aware that I am a rebel, and that it is preferable to tell time by the sun rather than wearing something that is worse than a Rolex Oyster). My dependable Mako have been sweating more frequently as of late, but no one in my town has offered to fix them. In the end, he lost it, made the decision to go to the "electronics" camp, and continued to purchase these Casios despite his change of…

Pros
  • rigid construction (upon first glance, the watch appears to be significantly more expensive than the price that is listed for it); a dial with a minimum of markings that is legible in the dark; precision in one's running; reasonable asking price; little weight (the watch is barely felt at all when worn on the hand); protection against water.
Cons
  • very thick (really, indecently thick); the phosphor on the hands and the dial is about nothing, just to be and nothing more; there is no luminous risk on the bezel; the bezel does not have a non-unidirectional bezel with a locking mechanism; materials that are, to put it bluntly, of poor quality; ultra-delicate scratchy glass that protrudes from the bezel; a disposable strap made of inexpensive hard plastic; and so on and so forth.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

I was surprised by the quality for the price.

Benefits include: Portable and cozy. The time is easy to read because the arrows and digits contrast sharply. ConsI had to fudge the time by half an hour, and the day of the week wasn't translated. The strap's buckle is made of plastic. The light accumulation devices are almost invisible in the dark.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

One of the best offers, glad I bought it.

For many years now I have been a fan of Orient Mako mechanical watches (yes, friends, I know that I am a rogue, and that it is better to tell time by the sun than wearing something worse than a Rolex Oyster). Lately, my faithful Mako began to sweat, and no one in my village undertook to fix them. In the end, he freaked out, decided to go over to the "electronics" camp, and still bought these Casios. Moreover, initially I had a negative attitude towards Casio: I don’t like quartz, I don’t like…

Pros
  • strict design (the watch looks much more expensive than its price list, though until you pick it up); minimalistic dial, easy to read even in the dark; running accuracy; humane price tag; light weight (the watch is not felt at all on the hand); water protection.
Cons
  • non-unidirectional bezel without locking; frankly cheap materials; ultra-delicate scratchy glass protruding from the bezel; disposable strap made of cheap hard plastic; very thick (really, indecently thick); the phosphor on the hands and the dial is about nothing, just to be and nothing more; not an instant calendar; there is no luminous risk on the bezel.

Got pros: Lightweight, comfortable. The time is clearly visible, thanks to the bright contrast of the arrows and numbers. Got cons: The day of the week is not translated, I had to twist the time for half an hour. Plastic buckle on the strap. Light accumulators are practically not visible in the dark.

Bought to kill in extreme conditions - cycling, tourism, airsoft and more. Justified all expectations. Still, Casio can do not only g-shocks. They floated and fell and almost burned. Has pros: Lungs. Simple. Pretty accurate move. Time reads great. The backlight is weak, but lasts a long time. Good water protection. The low price is not a pity (I took it in Korea for 22 bucks). Its cons: Still a bit thick, but that's a plus for durability. The backlight is not bright, you have to peer at night…

Revainrating 5 out of 5

A great option for this money, one of the best offers.

There are no drawbacks for the price. Perfect for wearing in non-greenhouse conditions. And if something fails, it won't hurt so much. Plastic has its advantages: the weight is less, it doesn’t heat up as much in summer, it doesn’t cool as much as metal in winter. Special thanks for the glass, which does not protrude from the case, unlike many more expensive ones, where for some reason it sticks out for half a millimeter and runs the risk of catching and breaking on something. There were and…

Pros
  • - Japanese movement, final assembly China; - Light and small; - Inexpensive; For this price there is: - Bezel. It is convenient to detect small intervals of time; - Luminous arrows and numbers; - Day of the week and date of a sufficiently large size; - Glass does not protrude from the case; - The loop on the strap does not go; - Ledges to protect the crown; - Good water resistance - everything except diving. After sea water, it seems, it is advisable to rinse in ordinary water; - universal laconic design. This series has brighter/quieter design options for every taste; - plastic to the touch is dense and pleasant, of good quality; - Long warranty 2 years; - Easy and convenient battery change system, requiring only a small screwdriver, which is good even with promises that it will have to be done every 3 years.
Cons
  • - The bezel rotates in both directions and does not snap. Those. in theory, it can be accidentally moved and knocked down; - The second hand is thin; - The phosphor is weak. And it glows weakly, even after a good sun and loses quickly. In the attached photo, the picture is better than live, because. modern smartphones can pull pictures in the dark; - Specifically, for this model, the numbers and arrows are such that in certain positions they merge and briefly (precisely briefly) the time is not read instantly; - Plastic glass. But, probably, there are less chances that it will crack, more likely there will be scratches.

Revainrating 5 out of 5

Matches the description completely, very satisfied.

The order came in less than a week, by the SDEK delivery service, the box was slightly damaged, not critical, but the watch was taken as a gift, so you have to blush a little for the crumpled box. The watch itself is excellent, light and compact, the dial is read perfectly, the hands are luminescent, there is water protection wr100. The design is pleasant and sporty. I think the first branded watch will be the very thing!

Pros
  • Cost, appearance, specifications, product weight, battery life
Cons
  • There aren't any, especially for the price of the watch.

Quite for your money. Of course, the Chinese ones were steel and the bezel was correct, with one-way rotation, the Japanese miyota 2115 mechanism, although cheap, was very accurate in my case, the glass was glass, and the first year there were no scratches on it at all . The light on them was better. But for 4.5 to be honest, now it’s a little bit dumb to buy them, and there is no longer a store. And we'll see these - as long as they like them, they perform their functions as they should.

Pros
  • Probably worth their money. Exhibited so far once, they seem to walk quite accurately (on a domestic scale). Inexpensive (in modern times - I bought a Chinese Rolex-like watch on Ali a few years ago for 2600, the last price for them was over 4 thousand) There are no insane numbers of hands and all sorts of blinking stupid screens, the style [distantly, but they tried] is similar to the Rolex Submariner Date: hours and date. Here, however, there are still numbers, but there are only dots and here is another day of the week. Somewhere someone mentioned that plexiglass is easier to polish on occasion, I won’t say here, I haven’t tried it on these yet. I did not check the water resistance, but probably it is more consistent with the declared than the Chinese (although they did not flow either). The bezel rotates, I sometimes use it to mark the time, I don't need "imitations" of the bezel.
Cons
  • The light source goes out very quickly. In principle, if not in complete darkness, then it is almost always readable due to the contrast of the hands and the dial. I didn’t like that there is no day of the week in 2022, I always confuse Fesdey, this is what I have to list to myself. The strap, I don’t know how it is on these, but on the sigma heart rate monitor I have a similar one that eventually decomposed into several parts. Plastic case and glass: glass is very susceptible to scratching. I just ran my finger on the first day, apparently there was a speck of dust - just a small scratch.

Pros below: Strict (masculine) design. Very concise and not fancy. The information is perfectly readable (literally from a half-look at the clock). In the dark, the hands and hour markers glow with a pleasant green glow. Cool! Quite light, almost not felt on the hand. The strap (rubber) is soft, not like plastic. Sits perfectly on the hand, does not rub, does not press. Pleasantly surprised and pleased with the rotating basel. On inexpensive budget watches, it usually does not spin, but is atta

Revainrating 3 out of 5

It's not all bad, an average quality purchase.

A good tool, not a decoration. I recommend it to fans of purely utilitarian use of watches. Be prepared that the watch will quickly acquire scratches and scuffs, but at the same time will endure all adversity. The watch is small, 40 mm, a little puffy for its size due to the rotating bezel (for some reason only the first 15 minutes are marked, and then - figure out + - a minute yourself). Show the day of the week in English and Spanish - why not in 2022 - do not understand. They look very…

Pros
  • Lightweight, waterproof, inexpensive and functional. Comfortable strap
Cons
  • Plastic case and glass, kind of cheap stuff.

So far there are no special comments. I wanted to pick up a black metal bracelet instead of a strap. It turned out that this is a problem. The plastic glass was immediately covered with a protective film for the headlights so that it would not scratch. Has pros: light watch, concise design, time is perfectly readable, as from aircraft instruments, water protection - 100 m, rotating bezel. Has some cons: The strap does not inspire confidence, I'm used to a metal bracelet. The hands and marks on…